Would you buy this scope?

[ReddingArcher]

I felt it move a little bit when I saw the reticle! It looks great I’m excited for this.

 

[bojangles808]

The scope is….




Fantastic with regards to reticle, eyebox, size, turrets, parralax- it is beyond what Ryan or I had hoped for.

3x
View attachment 1008217



18x
View attachment 1008223

Looks good. can you post a 7x or 8x view of the reticle plz?

 

[Formidilosus]

Looks good. can you post a 7x or 8x view of the reticle plz?

With the lighting and the textured wall here it was difficult to get a clear picture of the reticle.

8x

 

[Formidilosus]

There are multiple small design items that can be seen, that correct issues on other scopes:



Short elevation turret? Index finger touching the tube. It’s not tall.




Low profile windage- no problem.



Pinky tinger-

 

[redchinviking]

Looking better by the minute. Can we get an official weight?

 

[Ryan Avery]

The $999 scope that couldn't be made, or so we were told. If these three scopes are what I believe they are, we all win! Form and I set out to create a hunting scope that simply works, and at a price that nearly everyone can afford. If they pass the drop test It will set a new standard. A big thank you to the company that stepped up and said, "Let's do it!"

 

[NDHUNTER24]

Will we find out about who the company is today? A few of us might stroke out. Did you tell them you want a 2-8X36 already?

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

 

[BAKPAKR]

The $999 scope that couldn't be made, or so we were told. If these three scopes are what I believe they are, we all win! Form and I set out to create a hunting scope that simply works, and at a price that nearly everyone can afford. If they pass the drop test It will set a new standard. A big thank you to the company that stepped up and said, "Let's do it!"

View attachment 1008358

@Ryan Avery, the big question, are there mirrors on the ceiling in your room?

 

[Bfish22]

My guess is bushnell. Looks like it could be an lrhs with updated turrets and reticle?

 

[BAKPAKR]

There are multiple small design items that can be seen, that correct issues on other scopes:
View attachment 1008352


Short elevation turret? Index finger touching the tube. It’s not tall.
View attachment 1008353



Low profile windage- no problem.
View attachment 1008354


Pinky tinger-
View attachment 1008355

Since I am a lefty, that low profile windage turret sure is appealing. The turret on the SWFA scopes often digs into my side when the rifle is in the gun bearer. S2H

 

[bbckfh]

With the lighting and the textured wall here it was difficult to get a clear picture of the reticle.

8x
View attachment 1008351

@Formidilosus: I remain unconvinced by your “MIL is clearly better” argument. I might argue that it’s easier to lessen the first time, and that I should teach my children it.

What’s unequivocal is that your reticle is clear and clean and useful! BZ! Well executed. Enough so that I might consider switching over from 40+ years of MOA and inherently understanding my wind holds.

Can’t wait to see it in the flesh.

Can’t wait to see the 2-8x36 (or even 2-10x).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Wprinkle]

Just seeing the reticle and turrets makes my sticker peck out

 

[Axlrod]

@Formidilosus: I remain unconvinced by your “MIL is clearly better” argument. I might argue that it’s easier to lessen the first time, and that I should teach my children it.

What’s unequivocal is that your reticle is clear and clean and useful! BZ! Well executed. Enough so that I might consider switching over from 40+ years of MOA and inherently understanding my wind holds.

Can’t wait to see it in the flesh.

Can’t wait to see the 2-8x36 (or even 2-10x).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

HaHaHa
You might consider switching?
End of the line posser. No scope for you!