Fixed it for you.read "other than that how was the play Mrs.LincolnLeupold?"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fixed it for you.read "other than that how was the play Mrs.LincolnLeupold?"
If we get our way, it will be more like a 2-8x36mm scope done right.
The Leupold 2.5-8x36mm is a fantastic scope from a form factor and use perspective- they just don’t hold zero
I haven't followed super close with the rokstock thread lately, but im guessing the people are complaining about the 120 day lead time. Those people are going to complain no matter what. But i agree that would be frustrating and a pain. I would definitely prepay for the scope but what i initially was thinking was just a simple signup and how many you want. Whoever signed up gets first dibs on the scopes before the sale to the public. With the signup they would have a decent idea of how many to order.Look at the people on the rokstock thread just last week still complaining about stocks they are ordering that are not even late yet.
Pre-buys will just create a headache for them. Getting them on hand and selling out in a day is incredibly simple by comparison.
Ok, that got my attention. Sounds like its a ways off, but as an Eastern point and shoot hunter who would DESPERATELY love to be able to trust a 2.5-8x vx3 at like 11 ounces, and is settling for 19-ish oz 1-6 scopes...I'm listening.If we get our way, it will be more like a 2-8x36mm scope done right.
Totally - did not intend to imply otherwise.The scopes won’t be sold until they are meeting the requirements.
And, no- I do not think that the initial order will be large enough to meet demand. Without talking out of turn- they (S2H) have to pay for the scopes on receipt. I highly doubt they are going to order and hope 500 or 1,000 scopes sell quickly.
I think people just dont want to miss out on the run. Theres demand screw a presale discount. Sell a place in line for $50 non refundable deposit that if the scopes dont work out people sacrifice. If people are really ik with preparing for a product that might not work out then put the risk on them.4-6 months.
Tons of people have expressed the same desire. The issue is “prebuy” at all. The scopes are being made by an outside entity- even if a very good one. S2H has no control over producing or shipping them. Nit only that, they have to be tested when the arrive- what happens if there are issues? People all claim they understand that there may be delays, and their can’t be hard dates, etc, etc, etc- then start whining and pitching fits when real life shows up and those things happen.
Yes. Yes. And yes.Would a good reticle in the 2-10x36 credo check off that box? I forget if that has zero stop. Is Trijicon also stubborn about reticles?
More than one2-8x36 is gonna be a really nice way to top a rokstok lite. Bet it won’t be top heavy at all!
@Ryan Avery @Formidilosus @Shoot2Hunt How well does the 3-18 need to do in order to greenlight this second scope?
Whatever the model, it needs to have minimal administrative and customer service overhead to not cut into an already modest margin. Accepting deposits, tracking on who has made them, fulfilling orders, following up, etc etc all cost time and money. Simple is better.I think people just dont want to miss out on the run. Theres demand screw a presale discount. Sell a place in line for $50 non refundable deposit that if the scopes dont work out people sacrifice. If people are really ik with preparing for a product that might not work out then put the risk on them.
Can someone explain how companies can have decent reticle in other scopes of theirs already hence it’s already designed even but are stubborn about putting it into one of their other scopes? There has to be more that they are clueless, just point to shit like the RS1.2Yes. Yes. And yes.
Pointing to the RS1.2 I think makes the point ... Maven listened to Form and Ryan about the need for a more functional reticle, and we got the SHR-MIL, which borrows a little from the THLR. Great.Can someone explain how companies can have decent reticle in other scopes of theirs already hence it’s already designed even but are stubborn about putting it into one of their other scopes? There has to be more that they are clueless, just point to shit like the RS1.2
and FFPThe 2.5-8x36 vx 3 is easily my favorite hunting scope ever. One that can take a beating for maybe a little bit more weight even would be :chefskiss: