pumatom
FNG
state
Should say Conaly was the most crooked Idaho fish and game directorI stand corrected
But every one I
Does not surprise me
Co
That doesn't surprise me
Cobalt was the most crooked fish and game director in the state
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
state
Should say Conaly was the most crooked Idaho fish and game directorI stand corrected
But every one I
Does not surprise me
Co
That doesn't surprise me
Cobalt was the most crooked fish and game director in the state
Federal Judges do indeed rule on TES (Threatened and Endangered Species), like the grizzly, which are under the US Fish and Wildlife Service purview; however the Feds do not 'dump' reintroduced species onto public lands. These animals are typically reintroduced by State Fish and Game agencies in coordination with the Feds who manage the habitat. If the wolf was reintroduced in CO (& there has been some talk about it over the past several years) it would be done by Colorado Parks and Wildlife. They are the ones that have sent out surveys, questionnaires, etc. in the past, not the Feds. A lot of misunderstanding out there about who manages what. Just trying to clarify that the Feds (BLM and USFS) manage the public lands (i.e., 'habitat'), and they work very closely with State Fish and Game agencies who manage the wildlife. Wildlife is technically State-owned. You don't purchase a hunting or fishing license through a Federal agency. If you hit an animal on a highway you don't call the Feds - you call a State Trooper or Game Officer. When a wolf was mistakenly shot by a coyote hunter near Kremmling a couple of years ago, it was investigated by CO Parks and Wildlife.That being the case, how did a federal judge decide the grizz hunt will be on hold?
R
Why's thatMan...………………….ya'll need a few more rednecks out there! I can't believe people let these things get this bad out of hand no matter what the laws say.
A pack of released wolves wouldn't last 15 minutes here in Kentucky.
I was thinking the same thing. LOLSo long as your Fish and Game dept. asserts that, just keep shooting all the "big coyotes" you can find...
Must be a Kentucky thing. There was a guy from there on another forum that claimed his dog could hunt down and kill a wolf pack. Grizzly bears too. Funny stuff. mtmuleyWhy's that
U going to chance jail time
And U have no idea how vast and isolated the country is out here
Would love to see thatMust be a Kentucky thing. There was a guy from there on another forum that claimed his dog could hunt down and kill a wolf pack. Grizzly bears too. Funny stuff. mtmuley
yea me tooWould love to see that
i'm out there every year...…………...I know exactly how vast and isolated it is.Why's that
U going to chance jail time
And U have no idea how vast and isolated the country is out here
His dog better b a 200 pound pit bullWould love to see that
And he probably will need a few of themHis dog better b a 200 pound pit bull
Federal Judges do indeed rule on TES (Threatened and Endangered Species), like the grizzly, which are under the US Fish and Wildlife Service purview; however the Feds do not 'dump' reintroduced species onto public lands. These animals are typically reintroduced by State Fish and Game agencies in coordination with the Feds who manage the habitat. If the wolf was reintroduced in CO (& there has been some talk about it over the past several years) it would be done by Colorado Parks and Wildlife. They are the ones that have sent out surveys, questionnaires, etc. in the past, not the Feds. A lot of misunderstanding out there about who manages what. Just trying to clarify that the Feds (BLM and USFS) manage the public lands (i.e., 'habitat'), and they work very closely with State Fish and Game agencies who manage the wildlife. Wildlife is technically State-owned. You don't purchase a hunting or fishing license through a Federal agency. If you hit an animal on a highway you don't call the Feds - you call a State Trooper or Game Officer. When a wolf was mistakenly shot by a coyote hunter near Kremmling a couple of years ago, it was investigated by CO Parks and Wildlife.
That’s what I don’t get. why are they going to waste tax dollars on introducing wolves when they are going to end up there anyway the way things are going. Doesn’t make sense...I think they are already in CO. due to natural migration. They are in UT out on the eastern side, and in WY in the same triangle of the three States. DNR in UT denies but I know people who say they have seen them. My son had one run right in front of his truck driving up American Fork Canyon a couple years back. He said " It just looked to big to be a coyote or large dog" If I remember correctly there was a report on the news of finding a single wolf in No Utah. Tracks around the carcus showed another wolf. So it may have been a mating pair.
Gee, never saw this coming...
It's as if they are spreading out because of over population in current areas.
R
A side effect that was known and desired from the beginning.No no they don’t. See Buzz’s studies
Just read a post from Eastman
The liberal politics in Co. R going to bring em in
Wolves will destroy your wildlife populations
Just like they have done to Idaho
Do "anything" to not allow wolves in your state