Chris in TN
WKR
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2025
- Messages
- 1,854
Sort of a question for you guys with 20" barrels already:
Let's say I wanted to be cheap here and I went with a basic 20" Lite version. I already have one (the youth sized Lite Compact) 20" in 6.5cm and with a ~12 ounce can on the front, it's very muzzle-heavy. The length is more than ideal but not terrible per se. The weight makes it awkward to sling-carry and as I'm not a strict backpack hunter, or even close to it, I'm really stuck on making sling-carry the default. I'd feel stupid hauling a backpack 100-300 yards to a deer stand here at home, and when I hunt public land with a daypack, I just am not set up to appreciate a rifle strapped to a pack, or even in one of the various gun-bearing gadgets other than a sling.
If I had a lighter can, say 5-8 ounces, and/or an OTB designed can that shifted the weight further back, this would be an improvement over the balance of a 20" barrel with a regular ~12 ounce can, undoubtedly. But would the difference be enough for a realistic person to say 'ok this is good enough', or would I still want to have the barrel cut to 17"-18"?
Asking because this might make a 20" barrel make more sense for me. I'm mainly trying to avoid the cost of either having a new rifle chopped or having an older rifle rebarreled.
Let's say I wanted to be cheap here and I went with a basic 20" Lite version. I already have one (the youth sized Lite Compact) 20" in 6.5cm and with a ~12 ounce can on the front, it's very muzzle-heavy. The length is more than ideal but not terrible per se. The weight makes it awkward to sling-carry and as I'm not a strict backpack hunter, or even close to it, I'm really stuck on making sling-carry the default. I'd feel stupid hauling a backpack 100-300 yards to a deer stand here at home, and when I hunt public land with a daypack, I just am not set up to appreciate a rifle strapped to a pack, or even in one of the various gun-bearing gadgets other than a sling.
If I had a lighter can, say 5-8 ounces, and/or an OTB designed can that shifted the weight further back, this would be an improvement over the balance of a 20" barrel with a regular ~12 ounce can, undoubtedly. But would the difference be enough for a realistic person to say 'ok this is good enough', or would I still want to have the barrel cut to 17"-18"?
Asking because this might make a 20" barrel make more sense for me. I'm mainly trying to avoid the cost of either having a new rifle chopped or having an older rifle rebarreled.
