It gets way better mileage. Driving 80 I generally hover right around 18MPG in the Ford, with no mods. Those Toyotas just suck for mpg.Keep the 7.3, higher resale value and gets the same mpg as a 15 year newer tundra. That way, you always have the option to tow if needed/wanted. and get rid of the least fuel efficient car for the most efficient.
What does your Tundra get?It gets way better mileage. Driving 80 I generally hover right around 18MPG in the Ford, with no mods. Those Toyotas just suck for mpg.
15. I once thought I got 17 or so, but that was me failing at math.What does your Tundra get?
Toyotas are great, just have to make sure you can always see a gas station.
I have a 2001 CC LB, and all I've done to it the past 15 years is put the bellowed up-pipe kit in when I got it, and then routine maintenance like any other vehicle.......oil/filter, fuel filter, air filter, coolant change when needed. Not a big deal. Just like every other vehicle I've ever owned.I don't get the love for the 7.3, unless of course you find pleasure in wasting time maintaining and fixing diesel engines.....
I had a 99 that I put glow plugs in 2 times in 1.5 years. Mine was probably a pos from the start. But I was always fixing some oil leak. They are great when they're running good. But I've been around enough of them to know I'd never own one again. Unless I need to tow more than 7k lbs regularly I'll stick to gas trucks.I have a 2001 CC LB, and all I've done to it the past 15 years is put the bellowed up-pipe kit in when I got it, and then routine maintenance like any other vehicle.......oil/filter, fuel filter, air filter, coolant change when needed. Not a big deal. Just like every other vehicle I've ever owned.
They're great trucks for hauling, towing, and road trips with the family. The 8 foot bed with topper holds everything I need for my base wall tent hunting camp.
Unless you are going to be doing a lot of towing, you are about breaking even as far as fuel costs go. Gas would be slightly cheaper.15. I once thought I got 17 or so, but that was me failing at math.
I agree with this. Fuel and maintenance costs on the diesel will be higher than a gas motor almost every time. Not to mention the stouter springs on the diesel for a rougher ride. I just don't get a diesel unless you are consistently towing over 7k lbs often.Unless you are going to be doing a lot of towing, you are about breaking even as far as fuel costs go. Gas would be slightly cheaper.
Tough call. Personally I wouldnt deal with a diesel if I dont absolutely need one. The Tundra would ride better on most back roads too.
Is that the 7.3 idi or 7.3 power stroke?Ok, so here is the deal. We have 3 vehicles;
2009 Honda Fit (best hunting vehicle ever)
2012 Toyota Tundra 5.7, 193,000 miles
1997 F-350 with the 7.3L Diesel, 225,000 miles
Both vehicles are in good operating condition, obviously the Toyota has more bells and whistles since it is 15 yrs newer. We are looking at getting a more commuter friendly vehicle and are trying to decide which pickup to get rid of. I have been going over this in my own head and need someone with more mechanical experience. Which one would you keep and why?
For reference, this vehicle will be a dedicated hunting/fishing/rafting machine, nothing else. We would not be doing any heavy towing, only raft trailers and similar. A decent pickup bed camper at some point.
PowerstrokeIs that the 7.3 idi or 7.3 power stroke?
I have one with 115kThat's low miles for the '97 7.3L. They're not making them like that truck anymore. I'd keep that one if you're only keeping one.