- Thread Starter
- #21
I'm not 100% against a Holsun and many of my colleagues are big fans. The biggest issue with the to me is a lack of lifetime warranty. We've run a bunch at work, as have many co-workers. While I've seen they are fairly solid, but I also know that just like the others, they fail. I'm concerned about having to buy another one when it fails after the warranty is over. If they offered the lifetime warranty of the competitors, I'd probably have already bought one.The Holosun 507c is absolutely a better optic than a Trijicon RMR. It has better glass, a bigger window better electronics and cost less while maintaining a high level of durability. The RMR is a legacy product with a bottom load battery, really blue glass tint and a tiny window because the ear shaped frame eats up window size. The RMR is American made and super durable and 5-10 years ago they were the only viable pistol optic so they have a massive presence for that reason. The RMR replacements just came out a month or 2 ago so RMR’s are cheap right now and the new stuff is still unobtainable.
Both Holosun 507c/RMR’s are rapidly being replaced by closed emitter dots like the Holosun EPS and Aimpoint Acro P2. The whole market is shifting that way and I would chose a closed emitter optic on a G20 for weather resistance alone.
There is no reason to run any Burris/Leupold red dot. They offer no advantages over a Holosun. Pick between Aimpoint, Trijicon and Holosun based on price and features.