What does a 150" mulie look like?

[Lil-Rokslider]

So damn true. Until you actually start measuring them, if pretty hard to guess. People just throw numbers around for sure haha. Here’s a 266” bull, inside the rack of a 296” bull. Still not 300” hahaha. The 266” bull was 4 years old and the 296” was 9 years old. Check out just the difference in skull size also. Pretty cool.

View attachment 537267

This is a 270" bull, and I've seen lots of smaller bulls that people called 300".

Great bulls by the way! I'd shoot both of them any day!

 

[fishslap]

Exactly. Lots of 130" mules getting called 150+ these days. Same with 250-260" bulls

Here’s a scored 129” for others to reference against the 150s. I got a scored 150” a few pages back.

 

[Hnthrdr]

Hard to believe the right is 155

Eh it’s a super good buck, but a 3x4 with a really weak front fork makes it kind of believable, I stand by that mule deer scoring doesn’t account for maturity or wow factor than any other animal scoring. There are some really cool bucks that just don’t score well

 

[Hnthrdr]

Haven’t scored him yet, but I would guess he is 150ish range… I may be off though

 

[S.Clancy]

This buck was officially scored, take a guess.

 

[Geewhiz]

I measured this buck at 151 and some change gross.

 

[huntnful]

View attachment 537369
This buck was officially scored, take a guess.

135"?

 

[mikeafeagin22]

Haven’t scored him yet, but I would guess he is 150ish range… I may be off though

I have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about apparently after looking through this thread but if that’s a 150 with all that mass then sign me up for 150s the rest of my life

 

[huntnful]

I have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about apparently after looking through this thread but if that’s a 150 with all that mass then sign me up for 150s the rest of my life

Exactly! Mass on the individual tines themselves adds nothing to the actual score unfortunately. But that's a freaking awesome buck!

 

[S.Clancy]

135"?

162" gross

Just goes to show you can't tell crap from pictures.

 

[huntnful]

162" gross

Just goes to show you can't tell crap from pictures.

Damn I guess!! At quick glance looked like he had maybe 13" G2's and 18" main beams. But now that you say it, his G2's look probably 15". I'm still way off somewhere haha.

 

[Ucsdryder]

View attachment 537352This is a 270" bull, and I've seen lots of smaller bulls that people called 300".

Great bulls by the way! I'd shoot both of them any day!

Well you are 10 feet behind him. Always harder to tell when the nose is 3 feet from the camera and the grip and grin is 13 feet behind. Sweet bull!

 

[Lil-Rokslider]

Well you are 10 feet behind him. Always harder to tell when the nose is 3 feet from the camera and the grip and grin is 13 feet behind. Sweet bull!

Camera wizardry is an art every hunter should master. I started off making trout look bigger than they were for the camera at a young age.

 

[IrkedCitizen]

View attachment 537352This is a 270" bull, and I've seen lots of smaller bulls that people called 300".

Great bulls by the way! I'd shoot both of them any day!

40-41" main beams?

 

[Lil-Rokslider]

40-41" main beams?

One is 41 3/8" and one is 42 3/8"

 

[huntnful]

I just scored these myself, but made a decent effort. Some long armed, some not

118"


158"


164"


171"

 

[huntnful]

Here is also no frills photo of a 9 year old, 326" bull. His body was giant.

 

[WeiserBucks]

Here is also no frills photo of a 9 year old, 326" bull. His body was giant.

View attachment 537470

Your tag application consultant sucks!

 

[huntnful]

Your tag application consultant sucks!

Hahaha he's only helped me draw one half assed decent tag. I'll still keep using him though.

 

[bohntr]

I just scored these myself, but made a decent effort. Some long armed, some not

118"
View attachment 537461

158"
View attachment 537466

164"
View attachment 537467

171"
View attachment 537468

171” three point? What are the measurements?