There is no difference in the selection of a projectile in the terminal performance window for game up there vs down here.Can you please clarify?
Effective terminal wound channels are just that.
Terminal.
There is no difference in the selection of a projectile in the terminal performance window for game up there vs down here.Can you please clarify?
I find it humorous that there is a group feeling this is something new they discovered. 22 bullets, yes, you guys are early adopters, but the speed vs energy debate has been raging since WW2 and before. 4 decades ago Bob Milek writing for Peterson Publishing was saying how he shoots the heck out of elk with his 25-06 and 120gr corloct bullets, which perform about like what’s being talked about here. Three decades before that the 270 and pretty fragile 130 gr bullets were coming apart and killing elk just fine.
I like that you guys like to shoot a lot, but varmint hunters have been doing that since before our grandparents were born. I will never buy the argument that you should be hunting with the rifle you practice with the rest of the year.
Just thinking about all of this makes me want to buy a 300 RUM barrel. Lol
I’m not surprised that you own rifles, etc…. I did too when I joined the site as a midwestern fud and naysayer. Hell, I argued points with Form a couple years ago not knowing how truly ignorant I was.Yeah - I do not appreacite your assumptions and preaching, at all. Sounds like it might surprise you that I own a few rifles, do indeed shoot them, have ballistic calculators, etc. I don't think this takes hand loading to figure out. This is not about blindly listening to the internet and me asking to be told what to do. No worries though - please just consider that not every single person on this site joined recently and has no experience. I think your intent of running some numbers, trying different things on the range and in the field is good for sure - thanks.
I was simply trying to facilitate a discussion I felt like needed its own thread.
You're behind the times. That 22 lr pistol is all you need for elk, moose, and bear 800 yds and in.Needs a Tikka .223 topped with an SWFA
You’re saying the same projectile will have the same effectiveness on a Yukon moose as a smaller animal in the deer family?There is no difference in the selection of a projectile in the terminal performance window for game up there vs down here.
Effective terminal wound channels are just that.
Terminal.
Really.You're behind the times. That 22 lr pistol is all you need for elk, moose, and bear 800 yds and in.
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
Form actually just posted a top-down comparison of an elk vs a deer this week. In cross section, elk are not tremendously deeper side to side than a deer. I think the difference was a couple inches.You’re saying the same projectile will have the same effectiveness on a Yukon moose as a smaller animal in the deer family?
You know, you’re right - you guys aren‘t even arguing for speed in many cases.If I’m reading your post right it seems you think this is a speed vs energy debate?
You're behind the times. That 22 lr pistol is all you need for elk, moose, and bear 800 yds and in.
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
It’s not “speed vs energy“ at all.You know, you’re right - you guys aren‘t even arguing for speed in many cases.
That’s a good description. It’s the Toyota Prius approach.It’s not “speed vs energy“ at all.
“It’s” about terminal wound channels delivered in an effective, efficient, predictable, repeatable and consistent fashion.
Let’s hunt.That’s a good description. It’s the Toyota Prius approach.
I suggested if a 223 is good for 700 yard elk killing, a 22 hornet should be good for 300 yards - omg did everyone have a schit fit. LolBeen killing big critters with the old .22LR for 70 years!
Bella Twin, the .22 Used to Take the 1953 World Record Grizzly, and More
On 10 May, 1953, Bella Twin was hunting small game with her partner, Dave Auger, along an oil exploration cutline south of Slave Lake. She was 63 years old.www.ammoland.com
I suggested if a 223 is good for 700 yard elk killing, a 22 hornet should be good for 300 yards - omg did everyone have a schit fit. Lol
Can you articulate the reasoning given for why the .22 hornet is not a 300 yard elk cartridge, beyond "everyone having a fit?"I suggested if a 223 is good for 700 yard elk killing, a 22 hornet should be good for 300 yards - omg did everyone have a schit fit. Lol
22 long. I had to read the article because I thought it was a short that took out the bear.Been killing big critters with the old .22LR for 70 years!
Bella Twin, the .22 Used to Take the 1953 World Record Grizzly, and More
On 10 May, 1953, Bella Twin was hunting small game with her partner, Dave Auger, along an oil exploration cutline south of Slave Lake. She was 63 years old.www.ammoland.com
I don’t know why it was so upsetting - I thought I was helping bringing up a more suitable cartridge for those short shots like are so common with whitetail hunting.Can you articulate the reasoning given for why the .22 hornet is not a 300 yard elk cartridge, beyond "everyone having a fit?"
I have some recollection of the discussion, and there were some very reasonable arguments presented.
The real question is, what bullet will you choose for that RUM?Just thinking about all of this makes me want to buy a 300 RUM barrel. Lol