So instead of trusting 1000s of scientists and doctors around the world, nearly every news agency, and most of the world's governments you think we should all listen to 1 youtube video by an anti-vax butthurt former employee of Dr. Fauci who was fired and was caught stealing research? Who's paper has been discredited by the scientific community?
Freedom of speech has limits, just like you can't yell fire in a theater because you want to.
To be clear, I do not believe one should take news agencies at their word. I am just dumbfounded by the conspiracy theories popping up and how many people still think this is all a hoax and BS.
I never said it was a hoax and I never said anything about scientists. Matter of fact the majority of what you are saying i said, i hardly said at all. YouTube is by far the best source of information. Maybe you should rethink your position because it sounds like your saying some stuff you havent spent much time looking into. I've been following this stuff for over a decade reading research papers and following the money.
I mean no I'll words towards you at all. If anything encouraging people to seek the truth and stand up for our freedoms being taken away at a rapid pace.
We the people, including humanity around the globe need to come together to stop the tyranny that is taking place from four different angles.
✌
Edit. Those scientists, governments whi pay the scientists and many news outlets you are referring to ate vastly corrupt putting out paid for information. Educate yourself
I'm an exploration geologist / wellsite geologist. On a recent drilling campaign, we were discussing the different potential reservoir intervals with the client. The client had picked the well location, and to say the least it was a very poor location based on very little science, and a completely misconstrued understanding of the local geology. This particular client had rounded up tens of dozens of grandma/grandpa investors to pay for the well. Some of those investors visited the wellsite and were curious to know when they would see a return on their investment.
A line I'll never forget: We asked the client - so, how exactly did you pick this location and decide to drill here? He muttered the fact that everything you need to know about geology can be found on YouTube. He went to YouTube University! Not to our surprise, the well was a dry hole.
Another time, working for a small international company in Asia, our company's American exploration manager got into a spat with one of the local, well-respected senior geologists. This was a publicly traded company at the time, and the local senior geo was hell bent on a particular well location. The issue was that he couldn't scientifically explain why he liked that location so much, just that he 'felt really good' about it, and had done some sort of shamanistic witching exercise out there that had confirmed its potential in his mind. After the translator relayed that to our exploration manager, he furiously batted him down, noting that if a publicly traded company was picking their prospects on witching principles, it would ruin their credibility. It was some interesting drama to watch.We found our well on the top of a mountain by a Y-shaped dogwood Branch. Water not oil, but we got 60gpm. Voodoo man, voodoo!!
I'm an exploration geologist / wellsite geologist. On a recent drilling campaign, we were discussing the different potential reservoir intervals with the client. The client had picked the well location, and to say the least it was a very poor location based on very little science, and a completely misconstrued understanding of the local geology. This particular client had rounded up tens of dozens of grandma/grandpa investors to pay for the well. Some of those investors visited the wellsite and were curious to know when they would see a return on their investment.
A line I'll never forget: We asked the client - so, how exactly did you pick this location and decide to drill here? He muttered the fact that everything you need to know about geology can be found on YouTube. He went to YouTube University! Not to our surprise, the well was a dry hole.
Bolded part...libel and slander, both illegal and punishable by law, just sayin'...
Not that they don't have the freedom to say what they want under the First, just that the First doesn't protect them from saying stupid chit and being held accountable.
Many don't savvy that...
YouTube is by far the best source of information.
I will have to disagree. Youtube(and in some ways the internet as a whole) is a place where experts and idiots both have equal footing. They succeed not based on accuracy of content, but rather based on entertainment value of presentation. A very well-edited, persuasive, video posted by someone with no actual knowledge of the source material will go viral faster than a boring, dry, video containing vetted facts by a professional with a lifetime in the field. There are some that can do both, but how are you to know which is which? Just because I can sell you an opinion, doesn't make my opinion fact. Youtube is where you go for entertainment, not where you go for facts.
I will have to disagree. Youtube(and in some ways the internet as a whole) is a place where experts and idiots both have equal footing.
So instead of trusting 1000s of scientists and doctors around the world, nearly every news agency, and most of the world's governments you think we should all listen to 1 youtube video by an anti-vax butthurt former employee of Dr. Fauci who was fired and was caught stealing research? Who's paper has been discredited by the scientific community?
Freedom of speech has limits, just like you can't yell fire in a theater because you want to.
To be clear, I do not believe one should take news agencies at their word. I am just dumbfounded by the conspiracy theories popping up and how many people still think this is all a hoax and BS.
That's interesting. I got a BS in Geology in the 80s and always wanted to work for an oil company as a geophysicist. I also got an MS in Civil Engineering and that's what I do.Another time, working for a small international company in Asia, our company's American exploration manager got into a spat with one of the local, well-respected senior geologists. This was a publicly traded company at the time, and the local senior geo was hell bent on a particular well location. The issue was that he couldn't scientifically explain why he liked that location so much, just that he 'felt really good' about it, and had done some sort of shamanistic witching exercise out there that had confirmed its potential in his mind. After the translator relayed that to our exploration manager, he furiously batted him down, noting that if a publicly traded company was picking their prospects on witching principles, it would ruin their credibility. It was some interesting drama to watch.