They need to market to that niche again. Rich flashy folk with lifted trucks who go on one guided hunt a year love the recoil and loud bang because its a short experience for them. Their proprietary cartridges are a throwback, it would be awesome if their flagship guns were a line of beautifully blued rifles with premium wavy-grained wood stocks to look the part.ya all would be shocked at the redneck following weatherby has!!!!!!
Wouldn't magazine length be the limiting factor there? I don't think you can squeeze the heavier bullets in there without the ogive being inside the neck.They absolutely could breathe new life into their program if they reintroduced old bellwethers like the .257, .270 and .300 bees but now, with new barrels throated and twisted to take advantage of modern bullets. I could see value in that.
Wouldn't magazine length be the limiting factor there? I don't think you can squeeze the heavier bullets in there without the ogive being inside the neck.
They absolutely could breathe new life into their program if they reintroduced old bellwethers like the .257, .270 and .300 bees but now, with new barrels throated and twisted to take advantage of modern bullets. I could see value in that.
Yeah, I don’t know Weatherbys enough to know their mag lengths off hand, but that that too could need a fix.Wouldn't magazine length be the limiting factor there? I don't think you can squeeze the heavier bullets in there without the ogive being inside the neck.
Agreed, but then it wouldn’t be a Weatherby.The play prior to the rpm would have been to take a note from Hornady and Winchester /baco and reintroduce a line of 264/284 magnums in the 3.34” range. Beltless, medium magnums designed to shoot heavy for caliber high bc bullets out of their existing rifle line. Essentially same capacity of the existing 257-7mm wby case just beltless and non radius shoulders.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agreed, but then it wouldn’t be a Weatherby.
No disagreement.Eh they were willing to ditch that stuff with the rpm line for what it’s worth. It’s what the market was after at the time clearly with the popularity of the creed and prc. Most of the customs on here and other forums were 7 saums. Their mo has always been to build what they wanted then tell you why it was great.
Their most vocal knock was always cost of ammo and lack of brass (overblown, Norma brass was always good) they could have released a medium action magnum and partnered with some premium brass supplier to fill the need
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They offer the 7prc and 300prc in the 307. The 7 is available in both models but the 300 is only on the alpine model due to magazine length.It would be a hit to their ego but if they offered 6.5, 7, and 300 PRC I bet they’d at least keep up with Christensen.
I briefly worked in that store haha.I checked out one of their Mark V’s in a local shop and wasn’t impressed. Fit and finish left a lot to be desired. Especially considering the price. Pretty sure it was their Hunter model but could be wrong. Betting it’s still on the rack.
Recoil pad was fit by a blind guy and barrel hard into one side of the channel. Good grief. Not what I expect from Weatherby.
View attachment 573588View attachment 573589
Haha. Small world.I briefly worked in that store haha.
Sent from my SM-G990U using Tapatalk
I didn’t realize that. Good for them! I hope they sell a pile of those rifles. But I do think they’re leaving money on the table by not throwing the 6.5 PRC in the mix even though it’s direct competitor to their 6.5 RPM.They offer the 7prc and 300prc in the 307. The 7 is available in both models but the 300 is only on the alpine model due to magazine length.
No 6.5prc because they want to sell their 6.5rpm
Yea, I am all ears on that one too!Curious on the 307 comment, why is it a turd? Besides the obvious configuration and being a 700 clone, is it a poorly executed 700 clone?