It’s the pencil profile barrel with the .625 gas block size in 5.56 1/7 twist. I can get specific measurements if that doesn’t answer it.
I measured my bca barrel at about 12.65mmWhat's the diameter of that barrel?
That's incredibly thin for it going all the way back to the tenon part. I would like to know why there's no bolt gun barrel contours as thinI measured my bca barrel at about 12.65mm
The lightest I'm aware of is the Pierce Skeke Ti Rem700 SA. 15.9oz. But it will cost you. Probably close to $2k for the action alone. There are quite a few in the 19-20oz range, including the Kimber 84m and MacBros Element.i am sure someone asked this question, but are there any recommendations for a ultralight standard bolt action upper that would go in these designs. I know it would add a bit more weight bit i would be willing to sacrifice a few oz for something that is my preference.
Is the Howa Mini in that 20 oz range as well? I don't know if I've ever seen an exact weight given for it.The lightest I'm aware of is the Pierce Skeke Ti Rem700 SA. 15.9oz. But it will cost you. Probably close to $2k for the action alone. There are quite a few in the 19-20oz range, including the Kimber 84m and MacBros Element.
This is a copy/paste from post # 2273:Is the Howa Mini in that 20 oz range as well? I don't know if I've ever seen an exact weight given for it.
Is that a 700 action? The biggest problem I can see so far with bolt actions is the lack of lightweight chassis blocks that take a standard a2 tube to add an ultralight stock. The XLR element Mg would be best, but it's very pricey and would still break 20 after adding the stock and grip.
I'll answer the question about the lightest Chassis options in a Rem700 footprint (StupidLightweight will address this I'm sure, but I believe that pic is of his custom skeletonized Kimber 84m).Is that a 700 action? The biggest problem I can see so far with bolt actions is the lack of lightweight chassis blocks that take a standard a2 tube to add an ultralight stock. The XLR element Mg would be best, but it's very pricey and would still break 20 after adding the stock and grip.
I'm trying really hard to figure out how to do an affordable takedown stock for mine.
Other than being light, the affordability of making g a very short/takedown rifle from the AR platforms is the biggest draw for me. If I didn't want my 223 to match my main hunting rifle in form for training and familiarity purposes, I'd 100% go with the solo 300 or bca bolt action
That's the switch-barrel Kimber 84m mentioned a few posts back. It was light as hell, took forever to build, and cost three or 4 times what these ARs do. It was a very sweet rifle though. Total weight with the 16-inch .308 barrel was 3 pounds, 10.6 ounces. I think that was with scope rings, too.Is that a 700 action? The biggest problem I can see so far with bolt actions is the lack of lightweight chassis blocks that take a standard a2 tube to add an ultralight stock.