Truing BC and MV

[Formidilosus]

Spitballing here but I could imagine a ballistic solution that matches at two end points but is fudged in the middle, maybe.

What if your scope above bore/scope rail cant is wrong? You could be getting a solution at 800 that thinks your bullet arc is flatter than it is?

I'm a relative newb but it seems like this could be plausible if your inputs are off.

Not 2 MOA high.

 

[wind gypsy]

I know, I keep thinking exactly what you are saying. I'll probably end up ripping it off and getting an NX8 on it. SMH.

That mid range is what is perplexing to me.

If it shoots tight enough to get good center of group data you can shoot a tall target test @ 100 with your 520 dope dialed in and measure the offset from 100 yd zero to see actual angular adjustment scope is making.

They don’t always track consistently through the adjustment range.

 

[Muley Buck]

If it shoots tight enough to get good center of group data you can shoot a tall target test @ 100 with your 520 dope dialed in and measure the offset from 100 yd zero to see actual angular adjustment scope is making.

They don’t always track consistently through the adjustment range.

Yes, that's true. I might just try that, thank you.