Felix40
WKR
I can’t believe people still carry handguns without one in the chamber. Even born and raised had a video of them practicing the draw, cycle, shoot drill. All I could do was shake my head at the foolishness.
Last edited:
By pointing a loaded rifle at her and pulling the trigger. Yeah I’m pretty sure proper handling of the firearm would have prevented that.Hunter in Texas just had a ND and killed his 11 year old daughter. It happens. Saying that proper training reduces the probability of a ND to zero is asinine. Nothing has a probability of zero.
This study found 300 unique cases in the news in 2 years. And that's only ND's that are reported on in the news. Probably 10x as many that weren't reported on.
300 Negligent Discharges Study: The Shocking Results » Concealed Carry Inc
We studied 300 news stories about negligent discharges. The stats and numbers from these stats break down, where, to whom, and why these shootings happen.www.concealedcarry.com
Well, your well-reasoned and articulate response sure has me convinced! I'm never carrying a gun with ammo in it ever again! Thanks Dos!
If you're not comfortable carrying a handgun in Condition One, you should probably not carry one at all. The whole purpose of carrying in C1 is so that you only need one hand to shoot. Having an injured hand/arm/appendage makes it nearly impossible to rack a round with only one hand if you need it.This is rhetoric, IMO. Certainly there is some gulf of probability between 0 and 1 that one could draw and rack a round before needing to fire a shot. I’m not sure what the percentage is but I’d wager it’s pretty high, certainly more statistically significant than needing to draw at all.
Here's the reality folks. I'll start with a comparison to something that is much more impactful than one bullet being discharged:
"Designing a 'safe' nuclear weapon seems at first a bit of an oxymoron. Yet, one of the most important factors in maintaining an effective deterrent is assuring that weapons will operate when needed, but never when unintended. This must be true for the normal life of a nuclear weapon, from assembly to retirement. But it must also hold across such varied scenarios as aircraft accidents, natural disasters, and human error during production or maintenance. Over such a wide and unpredictable range of possible abnormal environments, it would be impossible to plan for and design against every scenario, yet nuclear weapons must remain safe across these scenarios nonetheless."
One in a Million Given the Accident: Assuring Nuclear Weapon Safety (Book) | OSTI.GOV
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Informationwww.osti.gov
If you read on, a scholarly dude admits that, despite every effort, the risk is never zero. The same is true with carrying a round in the chamber.
Because I have a brain that is always accepting inputs I can constantly evaluate and re-evaluate risk and adjust my approach accordingly. I don't wear my puffy and rain jacket for every minute of a hunt because it's not an all or nothing thing.
Scenarios that it might make sense to carry hot:
- when you're by yourself
- when you're tracking an animal, gutting/cutting, packing
- when you're in thick stuff and you perceive your reaction time available to cross some threshhold
Scenarios that it might make sense to not carry hot:
- when your partner(s) are also carrying a weapon
- when traversing difficult terrain
- when in a boat or airplane
You all should be evaluating risk all the time and adjusting your approach if you think it makes sense.
It was decided however in Mr.Uptain's case.Ha! That debate (hot or not) cetainly won't be decided here. It's been raging for decades and not solved yet! Now I do carry my hunting rifle and bow empty chamber (unless I'm ready to kill something) but if I'm worried about bears or bad guys my holstered handgun is going to be hot.
If you're not comfortable carrying a handgun in Condition One, you should probably not carry one at all.
When a cold breeze mauls me to death in a few seconds I will agree with you.If you’re not comfortable wearing your puffy at all times, you probably shouldn’t carry one at all.
They (LE) are also not trying to conceal them IWB at 3:30-5 oclock.You have a much better chance of an ND or AD dicking around with a pistol putting a round in the chamber when you decide there may be a threat. A quality kydex holster and a pistol made to be carried are very safe. Glock is the #1 handgun for LE worldwide and I promise you they are not carrying on an empty chamber.
They (LE) are also not trying to conceal them IWB at 3:30-5 oclock.
I've only been CC'n for 2.5 months or so. It's a Sig P365xl with no safety. I have not yet got comfortable carrying with a round in the chamber. From what I'm reading, I maybe need to look for another weapon. A DA/SA hammer fired would be Ok with me. But then I suppose you get back to the same argument, having to mess with a hammer and safety in the heat of the moment.
I have carried 1911s in bear country with a chambered round. But, not in a concealed manner. And I have a safety.
Brilliant, Gump!If you’re not comfortable wearing your puffy at all times, you probably shouldn’t carry one at all.