Timber Production Executive Order

To be specific. What you are suggesting and the straw man arguments you make regarding harming fish and hunting is EXACTY the tactics that have driven the last 50 years of industry destruction. and to what end I ask ?
Deer/ elk / fish populations have fallen harder under this management . Tree topping, moonscape making fires have increased exponentially, and entire swaths of rural areas have been left with no way to support themselves save service industries to yuppies who vacation from the cities.

The Unrealistic thing is doing the same thing and expecting different results. I for one am willing to say this has been effed up for 50 years and I’m done , log it , mine it, use it , but make sure we take care of it. In 50 more years we can come to the table and compare.
Those are real common sense issues! We have taken great strides to manage and regulate logging on public lands in the last 50 years. If you really read these EOs and you have any idea how government works, you will understand that those EOs tend to circumvent some or maybe more, of the regulating bodies that have been in place for many years. Some of these reporting agencies have been left with less staff to respond to the EOs. Yes, we need logging, no question about that. But we need to recognize the “science” that allows decision makers to ensure that we properly regulate the industry. No matter what the argument is, we need healthy forests to keep hunting and fishing, it’s that simple.


————————————
Status of research
Within the Northwest Fisheries Science Center’s (NWFSC) Watershed Program, scientists are study-
ing the degree to which freshwater habitats affect abundance and population growth of salmonids in
order to assist in developing rational recovery strategies for listed salmon species. Ongoing research
projects include studying the degree to which stream side buffers of different widths effectively protect
stream ecosystem processes from logging, and examining the effects of different land-use protocols and the presence or absence of juvenile salmonids on food web dynamics in small streams.

In addition, various stream side buffer treatments are being evaluated with respect to the survival and growth of trees and understory vegetation retained in buffer zones. Additional aspects of the research entail monitoring the impacts of fine sediment deposition and bed scouring on chinook salmon redds (i.e., the spawning grounds or nests of the fish), evaluating the relationships between coarse-scale habitat, land-use characteristics, and salmon populations in three large watersheds (the Snohomish River basin in Washington, the Salmon River basin in Idaho, and the Willamette River basin in Oregon), predicting relative salmon abundance in areas lacking fish data, and determining how low numbers of spawning salmon affect nutrient dynamics in streams and the productivity of salmon populations in the Snake River basin.
—————————————
 
Those are real common sense issues! We have taken great strides to manage and regulate logging on public lands in the last 50 years. If you really read these EOs and you have any idea how government works, you will understand that those EOs tend to circumvent some or maybe more, of the regulating bodies that have been in place for many years. Some of these reporting agencies have been left with less staff to respond to the EOs. Yes, we need logging, no question about that. But we need to recognize the “science” that allows decision makers to ensure that we properly regulate the industry. No matter what the argument is, we need healthy forests to keep hunting and fishing, it’s that simple.


—————————————
Science yes. Stopping everything in the courts because there were 2 T's and an I that didn't get crossed and dotted has got to stop.
 
Those are real common sense issues! We have taken great strides to manage and regulate logging on public lands in the last 50 years. If you really read these EOs and you have any idea how government works, you will understand that those EOs tend to circumvent some or maybe more, of the regulating bodies that have been in place for many years. Some of these reporting agencies have been left with less staff to respond to the EOs. Yes, we need logging, no question about that. But we need to recognize the “science” that allows decision makers to ensure that we properly regulate the industry. No matter what the argument is, we need healthy forests to keep hunting and fishing, it’s that simple.


————————————
Status of research
Within the Northwest Fisheries Science Center’s (NWFSC) Watershed Program, scientists are study-
ing the degree to which freshwater habitats affect abundance and population growth of salmonids in
order to assist in developing rational recovery strategies for listed salmon species. Ongoing research
projects include studying the degree to which stream side buffers of different widths effectively protect
stream ecosystem processes from logging, and examining the effects of different land-use protocols and the presence or absence of juvenile salmonids on food web dynamics in small streams.

In addition, various stream side buffer treatments are being evaluated with respect to the survival and growth of trees and understory vegetation retained in buffer zones. Additional aspects of the research entail monitoring the impacts of fine sediment deposition and bed scouring on chinook salmon redds (i.e., the spawning grounds or nests of the fish), evaluating the relationships between coarse-scale habitat, land-use characteristics, and salmon populations in three large watersheds (the Snohomish River basin in Washington, the Salmon River basin in Idaho, and the Willamette River basin in Oregon), predicting relative salmon abundance in areas lacking fish data, and determining how low numbers of spawning salmon affect nutrient dynamics in streams and the productivity of salmon populations in the Snake River basin.
—————————————
Oh wow "common sense" lets dog whistle away !
C'mon do you really think any of these "processes " are doing a lick of good? The velocity of information is entirely to fast these days if something is fishy I'm sure we will catch wind of it. Can you propose anything except keeping the status quo that we all know isn't working ?
I think Steve said it the best when debating a vegan .
" you may care about one deer more , but I care about all the deer more " or close .
you come across caring about one buck , one elk , one stealhead but I care about all of them . All the forest , all the fish , all the cervids , all the people .
 
So where should logging occur? I live in the heart of a logging community and we just had one of the best steelhead runs in decades. I also have an active job where every morning there is a herd of 40-50 elk hanging out feeding on slash.
Where was this best steelhead run in decades? Feel free to send it to me via pm...

Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk
 
Science yes. Stopping everything in the courts because there were 2 T's and an I that didn't get crossed and dotted has got to stop.
Quite a few times the Forest Service has simply ignored the science for whatever reason and they got sued for it. If Congress mandates and funds a management plan, those “laws” need to be followed. And those funds aren’t to be used for any other purpose. Having said that there have been times when court actions have stopped all wood cutting in the affected National Forests which resulted in catastrophic results. The following hurt the people of New Mexico to the point that firewood, which is a primary source of heat here, has become unaffordable. It was a real emergency but the President did nothing….Congress did nothing!

 
I’m all about protecting things that need it, but let’s be honest. If we had all the bs bureaucracy and red tape that’s in place now, a hundred years ago, we’d still be a 3rd world country. Reading by coal oil light and dying of dysentery.
 
I'm in the Ozarks. Log mills are around still. Drove past 2 today. They produce railroad ties, staves for whiskey barrels and charcoal in this region. One owner was trying to get a wood pellet mill going but ran into some roadblock.
The State conservation department is relatively insulated from political manipulation. If that's even possible. Their latest greatest goal in the public forest is harvest and return to open canopy and woodland environment. Even a savannah habitat in certain places. That's what I am hearing needs to be done on our federal land.
Yes? No?
 
The State conservation department is relatively insulated from political manipulation. If that's even possible. Their latest greatest goal in the public forest is harvest and return to open canopy and woodland environment. Even a savannah habitat in certain places. That's what I am hearing needs to be done on our federal land.
Yes? No?
“Ideal” conditions vary dramatically from one forest type to another. Ponderosa pine forests are often managed with the goal of creating a fairly open, “park-like” understory. Spruce-fir forests are usually not thinned to that degree. I’ll let people with more experience out east speak to those conditions.

An interesting issue is that management for fuels reduction and wildfire mitigation doesn’t always look the same as management for timber production.
 
Back
Top