- Banned
- #41
Ndbowhunter
WKR
- Joined
- May 24, 2016
- Messages
- 1,773
Just exactly how thick is the brush where you hunt?
I suggest the idea of a 3” difference in length and a 4 oz difference in weight making your rifle “handier” is more in your head than you’ll realize when holding the finished product.
My guess is you’ll realize more of a difference when you go to sell it and it brings several hundred less than it would have.
Full effort 300 yards an hour would be an average for scrub bashing.
38” is the total rifle length i’m Comfortable with. That’s mid point of my butt to crown of my head..
Any longer and it starts getting hung up even just ducking branches.
But in boats and trucks and stashing in the camper, and running a shorter gun case on trips where trunk space is a premium the shorter barrel comes in handy.
Short barrels with reloder 17 and 26 with high bc Bullets close the gap fairly quickly
Not a believer in ft lbs of energy as a reliable way to predict wounding but by any metric Luke’s load of a 147gr at 2750 with a .685 bc outpaces most traditional 30-06 180gr factory loads with a 24” barrel fairly quickly ie Nosler accubond at 2700fps and a .49bc.
It’ll be nearly 200fps faster at 300 yards and carry the same “energy”
Again a purposeful cherry picked dataset and the 180gr will do somethings the 147 won’t, but wounding potential will be similar out to about 400 and the -06 load losing quickly where the 30 caliber will meet 1800fps at 600 yards and the 147gr meeting 1800fps all the way out to 900 yards.
data came from 4200ft 50degree air temp.
Again intentional skewed dataset but just highlighting a point.