The Shoot2hunt Podcast

I’m in to buy one for sure. Wouldn’t mind if the whole “SHOOT2HUNT” engraving wasn’t so in your face. Is that just on the prototype that you currently have in possession? Or on every scope moving forward?

A more subtle “S2H” would be more appealing IMO.


There are two different threads going on. In the other, this is what I posted- https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/would-you-buy-this-scope.373983/page-90

“As far as branding, realize nobody had seen it until yesterday. No one is stuck on anything- if you think the “Shoot2Hunt is too big, or the wrong place, etc.- just say so. I can understand that the branding thing is important- not for a “look at this scooe” thing; but mainly as a “getting people to understand what S2H is, so they will be willing to listen” when new projects come up.

I would prefer no branding whatsoever, however I kind of like the “S2H” example that was posted earlier- it’s almost exactly what I drew up”.
 
There are two different threads going on. In the other, this is what I posted- https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/would-you-buy-this-scope.373983/page-90

“As far as branding, realize nobody had seen it until yesterday. No one is stuck on anything- if you think the “Shoot2Hunt is too big, or the wrong place, etc.- just say so. I can understand that the branding thing is important- not for a “look at this scooe” thing; but mainly as a “getting people to understand what S2H is, so they will be willing to listen” when new projects come up.

I would prefer no branding whatsoever, however I kind of like the “S2H” example that was posted earlier- it’s almost exactly what I drew up”.
Oh good, I haven’t been over to the other thread recently. Good to see I’m not the only one with the same thoughts. I’m sure it’ll get remedied. Thank you for the redirection.
 
1. The Shoot 2 Hunt branding looks good. It’s important. People can hit it with a black marker if they don’t like it. Note: it’s not the best brand name generally. Too generic, which is a problem generally in UM world. Sometimes too literal with the product names.

2. Using LOW for this is a win. Glad one of the brands with good access is working with you. Doesn’t matter who it is but it does look like Athalon.

3. Need an MOA version. Some of us it’s too deeply engrained, too much gear set up, and can’t switch. And to penetrate the market…
 
You guys are funny: Vortex, Huskemaw, Athlon, NF ...

Remember what matters here is the LOW + Form + S2H combination, not who had the existing relationship with LOW.

[But if it's who I think it is ... there's a very interesting two degrees of separation thing going on ...]
I think you’re too focused on the knurling of the turrets, which look similar to Athlon. I think the scope shape overall looks like a Maven. That would be cool.
 
My vote for the scope name is “S2H RokKing”

Would fit right in with the other jargon inside-joke style bad names at UM. OG SixFive. OG. OGL. Shoot2Hunt. HAHA.

They’re improving naming conventions with Raven, RokStock (which is just an ok name), Reaper, etc.

They seem to be using R a lot. So you’d assume the default scope name is RokScope.

If I were naming the scope, I’d start completely fresh. FirstForm.
 
I don't give a hoot about the name, the color, the partner, or anything else that has been brought up. I want a reliable, repeatable, and clear aiming device that has a strong aiming point and is brought to market at a reasonable price for what it is. You can call it the Durka Durka Wowwy Powwy and it can come hot pink with orange and green polkadots and as long as it takes the drop test and provides me a stable aiming platform, I'll buy a few.

Jay
 
I don't give a hoot about the name, the color, the partner, or anything else that has been brought up. I want a reliable, repeatable, and clear aiming device that has a strong aiming point and is brought to market at a reasonable price for what it is. You can call it the Durka Durka Wowwy Powwy and it can come hot pink with orange and green polkadots and as long as it takes the drop test and provides me a stable aiming platform, I'll buy a few.

Jay
Nailed it
 
You guys are funny: Vortex, Huskemaw, Athlon, NF ...

Remember what matters here is the LOW + Form + S2H combination, not who had the existing relationship with LOW.

[But if it's who I think it is ... there's a very interesting two degrees of separation thing going on ...]
2 degrees… So now I’m thinking Nikon or Pentax.
 
I agree with mr guide. I don't care what it looks like or whose brand it is. At $1000, built like a brick shit house, fits the form I want, does what it's supposed to do... You could brand it with a pink dick along the side and I'd still buy it.
 
How’s about the S2H Factor for a name?
I mean I’ve thought it and read “Form Factor” in here a bunch, yall could also get krazy and call it the “Faktor”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Seeing the turret, the most fitting name is Compact Hunting Optic - Drop Evaluated.

Size and form factor look pretty good, hoping to see it in person at the winter class.
Yes, please name it The Chode, lol.

Case rim slot on turret caps - nice.

Bottom reticle post is a little claustrophobic, but I’ve never used one like that, so I’ll go along. I guess I never hold for elevation anyway…

What’s the black marker on the parallax knob hiding - the illumination button?

Why not call it the RSS?

What’s the prototype weigh? Length?
 
Back
Top