roosiebull
WKR
I think the arguments in this thread represent that most people want this scope, but some will not buy it because they don’t trust that it will hold up to normal use.
If this scope wasn’t very attractive to most of us, nobody would care
I really want the 2.5-10x, it’s literally the perfect scope for me, especially at the price point, but I will not be an early adopter. Almost every scope on the market is a compromise of some sort, including this one… the compromise with the mark 4 to me is uncertainty of reliability.
If I thought this scope would likely hold up long term to normal use, I would be all over it. I have only had one leupold that I didn’t have to rezero fairly often, and it was a fixed 4x and I only had it a couple years, but never had to rezero it…
Never had one really far from zero, but besides the one, none have been confidence inspiring, I just don’t want another one until they prove reliable
I currently need another scope fairly soon, and the mk4 2.5-10 would be absolutely ideal, but I don’t think I can do it. The reason there is so much arguing in this thread is because everyone wants one of these scopes but it feels like a trick
Many claim leupold doesn’t have a reliability issue, and leupold claims that they don’t have a reliability issue, which means they didn’t address that with this series of scopes, and it’s still going to be wildly popular, so why would they do anything different?
Form’s drop tests at least get people thinking and paying attention, and that’s a net benefit for everyone, even if everyone is arguing, at least they’re discussing it
If this scope wasn’t very attractive to most of us, nobody would care
I really want the 2.5-10x, it’s literally the perfect scope for me, especially at the price point, but I will not be an early adopter. Almost every scope on the market is a compromise of some sort, including this one… the compromise with the mark 4 to me is uncertainty of reliability.
If I thought this scope would likely hold up long term to normal use, I would be all over it. I have only had one leupold that I didn’t have to rezero fairly often, and it was a fixed 4x and I only had it a couple years, but never had to rezero it…
Never had one really far from zero, but besides the one, none have been confidence inspiring, I just don’t want another one until they prove reliable
I currently need another scope fairly soon, and the mk4 2.5-10 would be absolutely ideal, but I don’t think I can do it. The reason there is so much arguing in this thread is because everyone wants one of these scopes but it feels like a trick
Many claim leupold doesn’t have a reliability issue, and leupold claims that they don’t have a reliability issue, which means they didn’t address that with this series of scopes, and it’s still going to be wildly popular, so why would they do anything different?
Form’s drop tests at least get people thinking and paying attention, and that’s a net benefit for everyone, even if everyone is arguing, at least they’re discussing it