The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom

I am an agnostic atheist who stands mostly on the null hypothesis and the burden of proof meaning that someone making an assertion bears the burden to demonstrate the truth of that assertion.

So, if you say that God exists, it it down to you to use evidence to prove that assertion.

I want to revisit this and flesh the response out lest people think I'm here solely to troll. I am genuinely curious about how people think and why people think, act, behave and believe as they do, even myself.

About 15 years ago, I started on a process of continuous self reflection and iterative improvement and refinement that has brought me to today and, ultimately this process continues daily. While I've studied religions and I have read various holy texts, I've never found reason to believe any of them. Even so, there's always that part of me that asks "what if you’re wrong" so I try to engage these kinds of discussions to try to learn more about why people believe

"I am an agnostic atheist who stands mostly on the null hypothesis and the burden of proof meaning that someone making an assertion bears the burden to demonstrate the truth of that assertion."

Does not the burden fall upon you then to definitively without a doubt prove that God doesn't not exist based on your own statement?
What physical proof can you provide that shows me the God of the universe, isn't real?
Not options or feels.
 
I was once a blasphemer and a persecutor and an arrogant man, but I have been mercifully treated because I acted out of ignorance in my unbelief.
Indeed, the grace of our Lord has been abundant, along with the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus.
I Timothy 1:13-14
 
"I am an agnostic atheist who stands mostly on the null hypothesis and the burden of proof meaning that someone making an assertion bears the burden to demonstrate the truth of that assertion."

Does not the burden fall upon you then to definitively without a doubt prove that God doesn't not exist based on your own statement?
What physical proof can you provide that shows me the God of the universe, isn't real?
Not options or feels.
It's virtually impossible to prove that something doesn't exist. However, it's almost always possible to prove that something does exist, even if it takes a lot of effort.
 
I am an agnostic atheist who stands mostly on the null hypothesis and the burden of proof meaning that someone making an assertion bears the burden to demonstrate the truth of that assertion.

So, if you say that God exists, it it down to you to use evidence to prove that assertion.

I want to revisit this and flesh the response out lest people think I'm here solely to troll. I am genuinely curious about how people think and why people think, act, behave and believe as they do, even myself.

About 15 years ago, I started on a process of continuous self reflection and iterative improvement and refinement that has brought me to today and, ultimately this process continues daily. While I've studied religions and I have read various holy texts, I've never found reason to believe any of them. Even so, there's always that part of me that asks "what if you’re wrong" so I try to engage these kinds of discussions to try to learn more about why people believe
You will never be able to dig to the center of the earth and find a shiny rock that says God is real.

Just how God will not stick his head through the clouds and say “Here I am”

This takes away from free will. In order for God to give us true free will then he has to create everything in a way that makes sense.

From the perspective of a non believer it makes sense. We have science that explains how things work and why.

From the perspective of a believer it all makes sense how everything is divinely created.

I think the hiccup that most non believers get stuck on is they don’t know the power and knowledge of The all knowing God. He created everything and has an infinitely better knowledge than we do. How can we even begin to comprehend or understand creation.

It goes back to faith. You cannot be saved without faith.
 
It's virtually impossible to prove that something doesn't exist. However, it's almost always possible to prove that something does exist, even if it takes a lot of effort.

It's always easier to prove something when you can hold it in your hand, but the burden of why you have a belief falls on each of us individually, not on someone else to prove it to me. You and you alone have to be compelled to find the truth, not your truth, or the truth that works best for you, the real truth. People can give you information, people can encourage you, but you can never put the burden on them to prove it to you, that burden rests full on your shoulders along with any repercussions, good, or bad.
 
No; this is a common logical fallacy. It's the other way around.

Yes, the worldly, I am not responsible, you are.

I am sorry, that's a trap you and many others have fallen into. No burden falls on me or any other Christian to make you believe, only to inform you.

Jesus have specific instructions on what to do when someone denies him or the proclamation of Christ.
Whoever will not receive you or listen to your words—go outside that house or town and shake the dust from your feet.
Matthew 10:14

While I wish ever person would believe in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, that also is addressed in the scriptures, that not all will believe, and how it will create division.
 
“And Pharaoh’s heart grew hard, and he did not heed them, as the Lord had said.”
‭‭Exodus‬ ‭7‬:‭13‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

This is a perfect example of you have to make the decision.

Pharaoh witnesses all these miraculous and unexplainable events happen before his eyes in a very short time but still decides to harden his heart towards God. This is a warning for us.
 
My point is still to focus on the idea of truth and if faith is a good way to know what is true. Less the difference between a goose and an elk hunter and more an elk hunter sitting on a different knob and looking at the same idea with a new perspective.

Your answer, the one I asked you to review from a different perspective, is kind of nonsense from the perspective of an outsider such as myself.

It can only work if you are already a believer.
I appreciate your candidness and openness to communicate, and as such, I am very happy to give a response. However, today is pretty busy so it will be later today before I can get a good response out to you. I hope you can be patient with me.
 
Yes, the worldly, I am not responsible, you are.

I am sorry, that's a trap you and many others have fallen into. No burden falls on me or any other Christian to make you believe, only to inform you.

Jesus have specific instructions on what to do when someone denies him or the proclamation of Christ.
Whoever will not receive you or listen to your words—go outside that house or town and shake the dust from your feet.
Matthew 10:14

While I wish ever person would believe in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, that also is addressed in the scriptures, that not all will believe, and how it will create division.
I would respectfully clarify that it IS on us to help others along the way. It is not an acceptable argument for us to say "you prove that God doesn't exist"

But like you say, we cannot MAKE anyone believe. If the respondent chooses not to accept and continually reaches for any reason they can to justify their current ways, there is little to nothing we can do about that
 
I would respectfully clarify that it IS on us to help others along the way

But like you say, we cannot MAKE anyone believe. If the respondent chooses not to accept and continually reaches for any reason they can to justify their current ways, there is little to nothing we can do about that

I agree, we need to help them along, but not with a stick.
 
“Faith shows the reality of what we hope for; it is the evidence of things we cannot see.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭11‬:‭1‬ ‭NLT‬‬

It’s completely unrealistic to expect a believer to show you proof beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s why it’s called faith.

It’s okay to question. It’s okay to wrestle with things that don’t make sense. It’s okay to think some people don’t reflect the heart of Jesus.

There’s a reality Jesus was never resurrected and God doesn’t exist. Even Jesus’s disciples fought against doubt, and they witnessed his works firsthand.

Watch “The Chosen”. It’s not the Bible, but it is IMO a good representation of the life of Jesus.
 
I was just thinking about how John the Apostle must have been an absolute unit. 1) He smoked Peter in the run to the tomb of Jesus, 2) he could throw an entire fly line into a stiff breeze, and 3) he was the lone disciple not to have been martyred.

To be fair, he was using a weight forward line with a shooting head.



P
 
Ehh i dont know. if someone is so dead set on God not being real i would challenge them to prove that. i dont think there is anything wrong with asking someone to prove their stance. most people can not prove God isnt real but we certainly can prove He is real.

sometimes challenging someone on their beliefs can make them really dig into that and realize where they are wrong. In reality, if someone says God isnt real its because they dont want to believe in Him. All the signs and facts are there, its up to the person to accept them. challenging their unbelief may cause someone to actually believe.
It is a thought provoking question that can be asked. But I don't seriously expect anyone to be capable of proving that something doesn't exist. It is a logical fallacy as someone stated above.

I simply don't want to overstate our position. It is not a good way to conduct conversation, because it is almost never received well to say "no you need to do it, not me". Nor is that a very charitable way to handle the burden if you ask me.
 
My point is still to focus on the idea of truth and if faith is a good way to know what is true. Less the difference between a goose and an elk hunter and more an elk hunter sitting on a different knob and looking at the same idea with a new perspective.

Your answer, the one I asked you to review from a different perspective, is kind of nonsense from the perspective of an outsider such as myself.

It can only work if you are already a believer.
OK, I have a little more time now to answer the question posed by you, so I will take a stab and see if I can't answer some stuff for you.

Take away faith and use only truth. There are really only two truths we can go by in any discussion about God. Here they are: you are on the earth, and you are not God. As an atheist I think you can agree to those two truths.

Lets break those apart. You are here (on Earth). How did you get here. Simple truth is from your parents. But that can continue all the way back to the beginning of things, ultimately back to the "big bang theory"...all things had a beginning, and the theory is all matter in the universe started a singularity that snapped and is constantly expanding and that is how we are all here. Now to get here, there had to be multiple versions of life forms, RNA turned into DNA and all kinds of very complex mutations with complex proteins all driven by DNA changes (think changes that beget changes). The biochemistry and biological changes that had to happen to get you where you are today are so vastly complex and ,despite the best of science and our understanding, we still have no real idea how it all happened from beginning of life to the end organs and differentiation we have today.

OK second, you are not God. I think that is a pretty self explanatory truth. If any of us were God, I think it would also be self explanatory as well. I think it is safe to say none of us have seen God in the flesh.

So where does that get us? You are here, and you are not God. Back to the beginning.

In the end, we all have a belief system. You, a self described atheist have a belief system that says at some moment all the matter of the universe was "somewhere" and it magically exploded and that is why we are here today. If you have a different theory on this, please let me know, I am making an assumption on the theory of why you are here. based upon many conversations with atheists and scientists about this very topic. The leaps of belief (we can call it "faith" if you want or keep it at belief, but the semantics are exactly the same) you take to get where you are today are enormous. What collected all the matter of the universe all in the same space? What caused the snap and sudden expansion? How did the primordial soup create life? How did life go from unicellular to multicellular to differentiated organs, etc, etc, etc, etc.....the list of stretches beyond our current understanding are very large and despite knowing exactly how life exists, we still can not create life in a perfect modelled system with all the parts. There are so many aspects of your life that require so many leaps of faith, just to explain how you got here today, that to say "lets stick to truth" is an impossibility.

But on the other side, we have a historical record of a man, Jesus of nazareth, who claimed to be the Son of God incarnate. The prophets from thousands of years before Him gave writings (the old testament) which not only predicted His coming, how He would be born, but also how He would serve, how He would die, and then we have historical record of His resurrection and the first hand accounts of His living on earth after He was resurrected and seeing Him ascend to heaven. This is not faith, in as much as any historical record is a faith driven belief, this is historical record, well preserved and well documented over the two millennia since His death.

As part of that structure, the writings that were passed down in the Old Testament give a record of how the Earth was formed, who did the work, and more importantly the WHY. The whole Bible is about the why, with a little how, but mostly the why. Yes this structure requires some leaps of faith, the biggest one being that there is a God who cares about us individually and desires what's best for each of us. But the leaps of faith all tie into a singular WHY that is coherent, and all leads to the finality of Jesus and His purpose and mission on earth...to bring salvation of a fallen world and its people back to a loving all powerful God.

I won't get into the other religions of the world as they are not pertinent to the struggle between truth and faith. But the reality of it remains, in order to believe in the two truths each of us possess, there are stretches of faith in all directions. If we want to be really truthful, the stretches of faith are A LOT longer in your direction than in mine, but you can not realistically say that you don't hold on to some sort of faith structure even if you call it "science". I put science in parentheses there simply because the origination of the universe stuff is not real science, it is all theory with no real way to test, and most of it is the "best educated guess, since we are here, we got here somehow". I believe science can be done really well, but it can also be abused and cause a lot of doubt for people who struggle with truth. I am a physician, as such I have a science education and understand the scientific process a lot more than most. I also feel science will eventually be able to create life in a lab one day, but that will not exclude the possibility of God, since God gave the blueprint on how to create life. Kind of like the joke where scientists finally create life out of dirt, and God comes back saying, "make your own dirt and then come talk". Science and Chrisitanity do not have to be mutually exclusive. They actually fit together quite nicely and science gives the HOW and Christianity gives us the WHY behind the HOW.

I am sure there are parts of this that are not well written, so please feel free to ask questions or drive nails into my post. I am very willing to discuss.
 
I think there is some truth to this statement
There's not a single person on earth that can 100% prove god is real or not. It just comes down to personal beliefs.
However, I do believe there is someone who can definitively prove God is real, and that is God.

I have seen things, witnessed things, and heard things that are simply not able to be anything but God.

Can I convince anyone else this is the case? heck no.


But, for anyone who really wants to know, and asks with a pure heart and a willingness to listen, God will reveal Himself in some manner. I fully 100% believe that.

If someone asks with a cold heart or with a heart of contempt, God will not reveal Himself. also, life has gotten so busy with clutter and noise, many people find it very difficult to hear God even when its a slap in the face. The US culture is not very spiritual at all.
 
You are taking things too literal--and many Christians make that mistake too. There are certain teachings that are dogma, and some that are not.
Belief of a worldwide flood that killed all inhabitants besides Noah's family is not a dogmatic teaching in Christianity
Not a pro but aren’t most of these events part of the basis for all Abrahamic religions? So it’s not just Christians who take it literally?
 
Back
Top