May need a new tread but tell us more about this 22-250. barrel twist, velocity, etc.@Ryan Avery are you sure you are not a Texas boy? Fetish for fast 22’s runs deep here in the south lol. Been running 88’s in a 22-250 for a couple years now.
May need a new tread but tell us more about this 22-250. barrel twist, velocity, etc.@Ryan Avery are you sure you are not a Texas boy? Fetish for fast 22’s runs deep here in the south lol. Been running 88’s in a 22-250 for a couple years now.
80 grain eldx in the works?We’re going to find out. Though I am much more interested in 77gr TMK, 88gr ELD-M and 80gr ELD-X.
Down here in southern Utah folks are shoulder shooting elk with 243 win varmint loads and wondering what went wrong.
Glad I haven't run into these folks yet.People in southern Ut also drink tequila with mountain dew
just sayin
80 grain eldx in the works?
HAHA!@Ryan Avery are you sure you are not a Texas boy? Fetish for fast 22’s runs deep here in the south lol. Been running 88’s in a 22-250 for a couple years now.
And massively effective wound channels.HAHA!
No, but I am a huge Dallas Cowboys fan.
The 6 and 22UM are all about hit rates.
Ngl that sounds delicious
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We sub Fresca for squirt zero...squirt zero,
blanco tequila
a splash of lime juice.
You can thank me later.
This was the goal from the very beginning (at least for me). A high BC .224 bullet at 3,500 to 3,700fps MV. Hit rates and danger space maximized, recoil minimized.
This looks like a very cool project.
Having read the 223 Mega Thread, the 77 TMK’s terminal performance surpasses all other current options, while the 88 ELD-M has superior external ballistic. As I understand, one performs better when it gets there, while the other should have a higher hit rate at greater distance.
Is there a distance threshold where given adequate terminal velocity, superior external ballistics supersede superior terminal performance? What push one or the other to be the projectile of choice in a given application?
ELD-M due the BC for wind. If under 600’ish yards I will generally choose the TMK as wind is easier to judge for me. All that aside, the 88gr ELD-M rates building a rifle around.
Just the clarity on the two bullets I was looking for. I suppose an additional 100K rounds and a few hundred additional harvestings would have enabled me to come to the same conclusion on my own.
That’s just a 20 year head start you handed out.
Seriously, Thanks for taking the time, and showing the willingness to share your experience. I’ve benefitted greatly, and will try to follow pass along to others lessons learned.
Perhaps that is a function of design to enable a shorter COAL, so as to facilitate standard AR mags…???
Just speculation on my part.
That has always been my assumption on the design basis and I've seen other people say it is.
Straight from sierras website
“Another benefit is reliable feeding in magazine fed firearms. The 77 grain Tipped MatchKing (TMK) allows seating to an OAL that permits cartridges to be loaded into M16/AR15 magazines.”