Centre to high shoulder hits. By the Eldx penciling I mean a narrow long wound channel and smallish exit. Still adequate for the purpose. Range circa 300, on cull deer. On the same size animals at similar ranges the Eldm have left a lot more trauma. At 300 yards they are both still holding 2700 fps. Photos bellow.
80 ELDM shoulder exit Circa 300 yds
View attachment 932917
ELDX exit (more towards the lungs than the above pic)
View attachment 932918
ELDX
View attachment 932919
Appreciate that thanks. Those two specific examples look like a 2nd/3rd rib hit versus 4th/5th rib hit…
Regardless, yes. The Xs generally create a more “elongated” wound, usually with still a very wide permanent channel (not “penciling” but also not overly round which most would call “trauma”). Yes the Ms can be and also look quite devastating, but the overall wound results and overall shapes I’ve seen on deer, elk, bear, moose, etc so far in 6mm and .224 particularly, favors the X just a bit from kill to kill (and its splitting hairs a bit if I’m being honest).
On thinned skin deer at high velocity for lots of lung shots with 80X and 103X it does seem to trend a bit “narrower” than a M at face value, but when you clean out and look at the permanent channels they create, and the reliability hit to hit as it gets closer to the off side, they are very impressive from a making things dead standpoint (X wounds being lemon shaped wound where M can tend towards orange shaped wounds) this is of course generalizing a bit.
Again, as I’ve said here numerous times, both Ms and Xs kill quite well, and shoot whatever your guns like… Im not an expert, but in what I’ve seen so far, if I’m shooting animals under that 130ish grain weight (6mm and .224) and want the most reliable results, it’s TMKs, ELDXs, and then ELDMs.