The 22 creedmoor thread

[Nine Banger]

A new barrel is a lot easier than continually messing with one that is picky.

Agreed.

I'll shoot the rest of my 88s plinking and then stick to 77s for the rest of the ride on the PVA.

These barrels age like a dog.

 

[Formidilosus]

Agreed.

I'll shoot the rest of my 88s plinking and then stick to 77s for the rest of the ride on the PVA.

These barrels age like a dog.

Haha

 

[Carl Ross]

Here's 12 77 TMK for the first time in the same gun that shot the 88s yesterday.

The 77s have 39.5gr H4350.

The 77s are carelessly (is carefreelessly a word?) seated at the same depth setting as my hand loaded 88s were set at with no regard for jump in my bootleg 6.5 creedmoor brass that was loaded with a powder drop.

The 88s from yesterday were loaded in nearly perfect Petersen brass and probably all trickled at 39.3gr H4350 based on a few I pulled just for curiousity.

It just has me wondering if a priority to neck turn is really "a thing" at least for hunting purposes.

View attachment 921161

I concur with Form on the underwhelming barrels.

Regarding the neck turning, short of benchrest the only reason I’d consider it is if you have insufficient neck clearance, that can cause issues. I strongly dislike turning, and sold my neck turner planning to never do it again. Then I got a brass-chamber fit that was too tight and had to borrow one.

 

[Bluumoon]

I concur with Form on the underwhelming barrels.

Regarding the neck turning, short of benchrest the only reason I’d consider it is if you have insufficient neck clearance, that can cause issues. I strongly dislike turning, and sold my neck turner planning to never do it again. Then I got a brass-chamber fit that was too tight and had to borrow one.

I spent at least $500-600 trying to get dud to shoot this summer. Lesson (slowly) learned, maybe,

 

[Castle Rock]

Here's 12 77 TMK for the first time in the same gun that shot the 88s yesterday.

The 77s have 39.5gr H4350.

The 77s are carelessly (is carefreelessly a word?) seated at the same depth setting as my hand loaded 88s were set at with no regard for jump in my bootleg 6.5 creedmoor brass that was loaded with a powder drop.

The 88s from yesterday were loaded in nearly perfect Petersen brass and probably all trickled at 39.3gr H4350 based on a few I pulled just for curiousity.

It just has me wondering if a priority to neck turn is really "a thing" at least for hunting purposes.

View attachment 921161

Despite all the hyperbole by a couple of high volume posters here, seating depth plays a huge part in how well bullets shoot.
The 88s generally shoot well either with a slight jamb ( and no, they don’t get stuck) or a big jump, like .050
I have never had a problem getting them to shoot in multiple guns

 

[Nine Banger]

The 88s generally shoot well either with a slight jamb ( and no, they don’t get stuck) or a big jump, like .050
I have never had a problem getting them to shoot in multiple guns

I've been playing the middle of your parameters based on crap I read on the internet. I loaded to 2.680 with lands touching at 2.700.

 

[Nine Banger]

Despite all the hyperbole by a couple of high volume posters here, seating depth plays a huge part in how well bullets shoot.
The 88s generally shoot well either with a slight jamb ( and no, they don’t get stuck) or a big jump, like .050
I have never had a problem getting them to shoot in multiple guns

I've been dubious about seating depth for the last year or so...just logically...it has to matter somewhat at the extreme ends of the range, but all the factory ammo is pumped out with no regard for all the variable reamers (and variable reaming) and I bet reloading is performed by a niche of shooters within a niche.

I should have asked you what you consider jammed before I did this but here's 2 groups:

PVA barrel, 1:7 twist, long chamber...lands measured at 2.700 with 88 ELD

I pulled 10 of my 2.680 loads and reseated them 2.705". I pushed on 10 of my 2.680 loads to put them at 2.650".



I thought y'all would appreciate this:

The amazon guy came while I was inside multitasking while the barrel cooled.

 

[ChrisAU]

Looks like it liked the bigger jump?

 

[Nine Banger]

Looks like it liked the bigger jump?

10 shot data set...says yeah.

I'm going to mash on the rest of my loaded ammo and shoot some deer with them.

Maybe come down .1 on zero...probably not.

 

[The Guide]

I've been dubious about seating depth for the last year or so...just logically...it has to matter somewhat at the extreme ends of the range, but all the factory ammo is pumped out with no regard for all the variable reamers (and variable reaming) and I bet reloading is performed by a niche of shooters within a niche.

I should have asked you what you consider jammed before I did this but here's 2 groups:

PVA barrel, 1:7 twist, long chamber...lands measured at 2.700 with 88 ELD

I pulled 10 of my 2.680 loads and reseated them 2.705". I pushed on 10 of my 2.680 loads to put them at 2.650".

View attachment 921391

I thought y'all would appreciate this:

The amazon guy came while I was inside multitasking while the barrel cooled.

View attachment 921392

Did you get a speed on the longer jump group?

Jay

 

[Nine Banger]

Did you get a speed on the longer jump group?

Jay

I didn't.

What are you thinking?

Faster, slower, same?

I assumed it would be the same but I guess there's technically more pressure.

 

[The Guide]

I didn't.

What are you thinking?

Faster, slower, same?

I assumed it would be the same but I guess there's technically more pressure.

I was just wondering if you saw a change in speed. I'd imagine you'd see higher cartridge pressure but a lower peak pressure due to the increased jump. Sometimes I think you get better accuracy due to lead engagement and bullet engraving. Maybe it is lead angle differences or bullet jacket hardness but that is just my theory as to why a bullet that won't shoot well with a middle jump will do better with a big jump or no jump at all.

Jay