Telepathy - truth or science fiction?

[DapperDan]

I’m on episode 7 and I’m still blown away. It all makes a lot of sense, my brother and I have always had a weird thing where we wear the same shirts to family gatherings etc without coordinating. And we’ve always been great at communicating with little to no words (awesome for a hunting buddy). I always just chalked it up to knowing each other well, but after listening to all the evidence I think there’s got to be some kind of old skills folks just don’t acknowledge or practice at all (call it telepathy or what have you). It’s like if it was common practice to never walk or exercise at all so everyone is sedentary and incapable, then you tell them about people who climb mountains and run marathons, it would sound insane but it’s just a matter of gradual and intentional exercise.

Episode 9 is something else….



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DapperDan]

No, it’s not.



I’m a chemist by training and ex-professor, who now works on the clinical trial side of biopharma for a living. I have spent lots and lots of time with peer reviewed literature.

Ah, so maybe you can answer the question of why childhood vaccines were approved without adequate clinical trials. Some without a placebo.

And maybe you can explain why sv40 was found in the cv19 jab.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DapperDan]

You already knew where this thread was going right? Because telepathy.

That’s not funny. Maybe if you spent time listening to these parents stories you wouldn’t poke fun.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[atmat]

Ah, so maybe you can answer the question of why childhood vaccines were approved without adequate clinical trials. Some without a placebo.

And maybe you can explain why sv40 was found in the cv19 jab.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your questions are answered here.

 

[Marbles]

No, we don’t. In fact, there is insurmountable evidence to suggest otherwise. But if you want to give your child the MMR vaccine (one of which that had no clinical placebo trial and resulted in adverse effects) then that’s your choice. Just remember, those that develop the drug are 100% immune to accountability.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1684344319904448517

Maybe you can tell the same to Nicole, her daughter, and THOUSANDS of other children and their families that have suffered the same outcome.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1902446437087986125

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If MMR caused autism, then it would be seen at a population level. The data is there from multiple countries that collect it on their entire population, and their is not an association. This holds true in multiple studies using various designs. Hell, Canada found autism rates increased as MMR vaccination rates decreased in Quebec. I guess not getting the MMR causes autism, right? (Obviously not, but it certainly doesn't support getting MMR causing it).

Here, a brief summary of the mountain of evidence. Notice the variation in were it comes from. Notice how long that data has been available too. When the question was valid, people explored it, once the answer became painfully obvious, it was time to stop wasting resources on it.

Vaccines and Autism: A Tale of Shifting Hypotheses - PMC

Although child vaccination rates remain high, some parental concern persists that vaccines might cause autism. Three specific hypotheses have been proposed: (1) the combination measles-mumps-rubella vaccine causes autism by damaging the intestinal ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

An n of one temporal association is like blaming the snack you were eating for the flat tire, I mean, the tire did go flat 15.4 seconds after I eat the tofu, proof god hates tofu and those who eat it.

lol. So information posted by physicians isn’t enough. Why don’t you go do your own searching then???


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I also find it incredibly amusing that you appeal to someone being a physician to validate what they say while ignoring thousands more who disagree. You don't trust physicians, unless they tell you what you want to hear. Then, well, we all should trust them.

Thanks for telling me without telling me that you are perfectly fine being logically inconsistent.

 

[JohnJohnson]

So information posted by physicians isn’t enough.

I think the average person would be astounded how ignorant most (especially general practice) physicians are about a lot of stuff.

Random physicians are not researchers and normally have never done any research at all their whole life outside of spending a year pipetting stuff in a lab during their undergrad to pad their med school application. And no, case studies do not count as we saw with the CWD -> CJD case study paper written by physicians last year.

Why don’t you go do your own searching then???

I did. They even gave me a pretentious title that I never use.

Source: I'm a biomedical researcher and have collaborated with medical doctors in some capacity on most of my research.

 

[DapperDan]

Your questions are answered here.

FOIA request proved fda covered up clinical trials for MMR. 42 days and approved for licensure.

There were eight clinical trials that in total had less than 1,000 individuals, out of which only 342 children received the MMR vaccine
The safety review period only tracked 'adverse events' for 42 days after injection
More than half or a significant percent of all participants in each of the eight trials developed gastrointestinal symptoms and upper respiratory infections
All adverse events were generically described as 'other viruses' and not considered in safety profile of licensure

Big pharma caught lying over MMR efficacy.

Big Pharma admits it lied over MMR vaccine - The Conservative Woman

Big Pharma admits it lied over MMR vaccine

www.conservativewoman.co.uk

Peer review journal stating sv40 was found in cv19 jabs.

BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

Background: BNT162b2 RNA-based COVID-19 injections are specified to transfect human cells to efficiently produce spike proteins for an immune response.

publichealthpolicyjournal.com

Sv40 causes turbo cancers…. In fact it was being used in the early 1960’s for cancer research that was morphed into a bioweapon. Think gain of function research. Dont believe me? Research Dr Jack Kruse. He’s a neuroscientist that did his residency where this occurred. Or better yet, Judyth Vary Baker. She’s still alive. She was a scientist doing the experiments in New Orleans. And she was just on the Danny Jones podcast. And she kept A LOT of receipts.

What do we have here??? Google says it’s not used in vaccines and has a “potential” role of causing cancer. Nah, Google wouldn’t lie and suppress the truth would they???? Again, ask Nicole Shanahan, the Google cofounder’s ex wife. She admitted it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DapperDan]

I think the average person would be astounded how ignorant most (especially general practice) physicians are about a lot of stuff.

Random physicians are not researchers and normally have never done any research at all their whole life outside of spending a year pipetting stuff in a lab during their undergrad to pad their med school application. And no, case studies do not count as we saw with the CWD -> CJD case study paper written by physicians last year.

I did. They even gave me a pretentious title that I never use.

Source: I'm a biomedical researcher and have collaborated with medical doctors in some capacity on most of my research.

Then you would understand that a peer reviewed study can be easily manipulated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DapperDan]

Substack with a plethora of info.

Nepetalactone Newsletter | Anandamide | Substack

Decentralized Medicine. Click to read Nepetalactone Newsletter, by Anandamide, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.

anandamide.substack.com

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DapperDan]

View attachment 859346

Wow…. That’s very crude.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[fwafwow]

Wow…. That’s very crude.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah. I had second thoughts about it. Will delete.

 

[DapperDan]

Yeah. I had second thoughts about it. Will delete.

I appreciate it. Thanks for deleting it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Idaboy]

Yes, definitely seen telepathy....I believe the first time was in 1977, by Obie-Wan....multiple Jedi since have pulled off.

 

[elkhunter505]

Your questions are answered here.

I was so excited to see this article and I can tell you I’m even more excited at where the link took me . Well played, master class

 

[Gobbler36]

Agree. Even long standing peer reviewed, accepted, etc... "science" is occasionally shot down with new research findings. Is science therefore not to be trusted? Nope, it's the best thing we've got until it's not. To be clear I am in no way a science denier, I've just been around it long enough to see the above in action. Most of it and most researchers are good but there is some that is pure bunk. I hear about it and see it somewhat regularly.

I personally feel that “science” is only as good as the bias of those who is interpreting the data. How many times did we hear trust the science in Covid? The science they were pushing was complete BS.
People can believe that but can’t think that they would do this with other health topics as well?
I made a choice for my family on vaccines based on my own logic, research and my wife and Is personal expirience. I’ve made my peace with those decisions that I don’t care what some researcher tells me their findings and all their peer reviewed BS.

Im sure the food pyramid was peer reviewed at one time.

 

[DapperDan]

I’m on episode 7 and I’m still blown away. It all makes a lot of sense, my brother and I have always had a weird thing where we wear the same shirts to family gatherings etc without coordinating. And we’ve always been great at communicating with little to no words (awesome for a hunting buddy). I always just chalked it up to knowing each other well, but after listening to all the evidence I think there’s got to be some kind of old skills folks just don’t acknowledge or practice at all (call it telepathy or what have you). It’s like if it was common practice to never walk or exercise at all so everyone is sedentary and incapable, then you tell them about people who climb mountains and run marathons, it would sound insane but it’s just a matter of gradual and intentional exercise.

When you finish the podcasts you should give this a listen. But don’t listen until you finish. lol

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Marbles]

FOIA request proved fda covered up clinical trials for MMR. 42 days and approved for licensure.

There were eight clinical trials that in total had less than 1,000 individuals, out of which only 342 children received the MMR vaccine
The safety review period only tracked 'adverse events' for 42 days after injection
More than half or a significant percent of all participants in each of the eight trials developed gastrointestinal symptoms and upper respiratory infections
All adverse events were generically described as 'other viruses' and not considered in safety profile of licensure

This claim overlooks so much it is effectively a lie. For example, the measles component of MMR underwent a RCT that completed in 1966, it was placebo controled, and enrolled 4,758 patients. Other components had similar testing.

Beyond that, we have mountains of post approval studies covering hundreds of thousands that find no such side effect rates. something like over 48 RCTs covering thousands of patients.

Big pharma caught lying over MMR efficacy.

Big Pharma admits it lied over MMR vaccine - The Conservative Woman

Big Pharma admits it lied over MMR vaccine

www.conservativewoman.co.uk

Lawsuit that Marek prevailed in. Beyond that, the suit only alleged lack of efficacy at the end off shelf life. AKA, this article intentionally miss represents the facts, also know as lying. Funny, lying to call others liars, in a twisted way, it makes sense.

Physicians for informed consent thinks it is safer to get infected and claims measles only kills 1 in 90,000. I guess the current measles outbreak has infected 180,000 people given two have died from it. That or they are lying, I vote for the latter as the former doesn't add up.

Edited for spelling/typos

 

[Speaks]

FOIA request proved fda covered up clinical trials for MMR. 42 days and approved for licensure.

There were eight clinical trials that in total had less than 1,000 individuals, out of which only 342 children received the MMR vaccine
The safety review period only tracked 'adverse events' for 42 days after injection
More than half or a significant percent of all participants in each of the eight trials developed gastrointestinal symptoms and upper respiratory infections
All adverse events were generically described as 'other viruses' and not considered in safety profile of licensure

Big pharma caught lying over MMR efficacy.

So I am generally skeptical of big pharma and their relationship to government. The way our vaccine system is set up is also a bit of a moral hazard between testing requirements being less stringent than other drugs, lack of liability, the absurd amount of $ that comes from getting a vaccine scheduled, and royalties paid to NIH employees.

There are examples where we have been mislead for profit, some may involve dangerous and/or ineffective products sometimes its just tipping the cost/benefit scale a little bit.

You also have to be very careful of sources showing issues, may of them have even less rigor than our drug evaluation process and their own incentives to show issues. Many dont understand the underlying testing process, or even basic statistics. Some jump to absurd conclusions that are easy to spot and some are harder to evaluate, most only present evidence that favors their conclusions.

Also we have to remember that ALL drug have risks and will have some % of recipients who have a very negative reaction. Likewise nearly all diseases even very mild ones will have some % of people who have very negative reactions to them. Cost benefit analysis does not rely on achieving zero risk. There are also individual cost benefit equations that need to be weighed against societal. For example if everyone else is vaccinated against everything it might make sense for an individual to be vaccinated against nothing, they avoid risk of vaccines but also avoid risk of disease through everyone else being vaccinated, but when a sizeable portion of people go that route it might turn out worse for more people. Smallpox at one point in time likely fit that.

Others like Covid should have likely been targeted to much smaller groups, and some like HPV might just be an overall bad idea. Some others like Hep C might make a lot of sense but for older children and not babies. Others are useful, I am glad I have had my tetnis shots and was thankful for rabies shots when I got bit by a bat last year.

Then there is the question of how many we get and how close together and at what age which significantly complicates things especially when you throw in the question impact on food allergies and such. Its complicated.

I am very sympathetic to your skepticism of our system but it would be good to also develop a heathy skepticism of some of your other sources.

I have very little in the way of strong well informed opinions on most vaccines and have no reason to go down that rabbit hole of becoming well informed as I dont have children currently getting vaccinated and as a healthy middle aged adult there is really nothing I need outside of the occasional tetnis shot. As I get a bit older I will likely spend some time evaluating the shingles shot and some others. I have never had any interest in flu shots, and certainly do not in covid shots.

I do think generally speaking that both drug approval and liability should likely look the same for vaccines as it does for other drugs and that there should not be royalties paid to regulators though would be open to hear arguments on why I am wrong.

I do wish that we could have some prominent vaccine experts publicly debate some prominent skeptics. Both sides tend to argue against straw man versions of the other side and not address the best points which leads everyone to dig in their heals on absolutist positions that on both sides of the argument seem rather dumb.

 

[Mike Islander]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you don’t want to listen to the podcast, here is a video podcast with the lady who did the podcast series. It shows some video of the children as well. She admits that she was very skeptical as was her crew.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Literally experimental design for 101 (actually remedial 100 level) demonstrates how ridiculously poor and uncontrolled her techniques are. Pure queueing on the part of the hokus pokus Dr. Let's list a few bullets of her negligent techniques. Then maybe take a minute to learn why you were fooled by something so obviously unscientific. Dunning-Kruger. Look that up. Then go to YouTube and watch the Balogna Detection Kit video.

ChatGPT 4o

Top 10 Most Obvious Problems with the "Harvard Telepathic Autistic Kids" Tapes:

No Official Harvard Study: There is no verified study from Harvard University supporting these claims.

Anonymous Sources: The children and researchers involved are rarely named or confirmed.

No Peer Review: The tapes were never published in any scientific journal for review.

Lack of Physical Evidence: No recordings, transcripts, or data are publicly available.

Extraordinary Claims: Telepathy contradicts everything known about brain science.

No Reproducibility: No one else has been able to repeat the results.

Misuse of Scientific Terms: Terms like “quantum” and “frequencies” are thrown around without clear meaning.

Emotional Appeal: Stories often focus on dramatic or heartwarming elements instead of evidence.

Tied to Pseudoscience Movements: Often linked to fringe theories and anti-mainstream science narratives.

Viral Hoax Patterns: Shares features with other internet hoaxes—mystery, secrecy, and supposed cover-ups.

Scientific Community Summary (Simple Language):
Scientists say there's no good proof that telepathy is real, and the Harvard tapes have no verified research behind them. The claims don’t follow the rules of science, like testing things and showing your work. So, most scientists believe these tapes are either made-up or misunderstood stories.

The claims about telepathic abilities in nonverbal autistic children are primarily associated with "The Telepathy Tapes," a podcast series created by documentary director Ky Dickens. This series presents accounts suggesting that some nonverbal autistic individuals can communicate telepathically. The podcast's website offers videos purportedly demonstrating these abilities; however, access to these videos is restricted behind a paywall.

While these videos are available online, it's important to note that they have not been subjected to rigorous scientific validation. Critics argue that the observed communications can be explained by known psychological phenomena, such as the ideomotor effect, where facilitators may unconsciously guide the responses of the individuals. This skepticism is rooted in the lack of empirical evidence supporting telepathy and the potential for bias in the methods used to demonstrate these claims.

Given the current scientific understanding, the broader scientific community remains unconvinced by these claims due to the absence of reproducible evidence and methodological concerns surrounding the demonstrations.

 

[Idaboy]

Jedi.....never underestimate