SWFA 3-9 vs Maven RS1.2 2.5-15 vs SWFA 3-15 with Mil reticle/FFP

Which rifle scope would you choose

  • SWFA 3-9x

    Votes: 24 77.4%
  • SWFA 3-15x

    Votes: 7 22.6%

  • Total voters
    31

JFK

WKR
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
848
If you are ok with a sfp scope the nightforce shv 3-10 is a solid choice. I have one and and a swfa 3-9, and prefer the shv. Shoot mine out to 600 regularly.
 

pods8 (Rugged Stitching)

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
4,847
Location
Thornton, CO
It's pretty tough getting a 1.2 right now too.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
A couple weeks since last restock is different than a couple years. :p I feel good about the assumption maven will get some more of the 1.2 within months. I am starting to wonder if SWFA will ever get more 3x9, hopefully I am wrong. And/or someone fills the void in that market.
 

RWT

WKR
Joined
Jul 4, 2022
Messages
366
The RS 1 has been tested and I just shipped mine to Ryan today. Should be in his hands next week.


Let’s hope it holds up to @Form.

I would really like to try the Maven 2.5x10 1” model and compare it to the Tri Credo 3x9. Looks to be a good set-forget option I can provide to all my no dialing, hunting buddies.

Regarding the original question. I have all 3 of the scopes mentioned. The Maven smokes the SWFA’s in every category but weight IMO. As soon as the RS1.2’s are back in stock I’ll be parting ways with all but one SWFA. The SWFA will always have a spot in my safe,however, they are an unfortunate victim of poor business practices. No warranty support is killing their brand.
 

Grundy53

WKR
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
1,091
Location
Washington State
A couple weeks since last restock is different than a couple years. I feel good about the assumption maven will get some more of the 1.2 within months. I am starting to wonder if SWFA will ever get more 3x9, hopefully I am wrong. And/or someone fills the void in that market.
I completely agree. I just wish they could keep them in stock. Every time they get them in stock its like trying to get an Idaho tag.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
 

Grundy53

WKR
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
1,091
Location
Washington State
The RS 1 has been tested and I just shipped mine to Ryan today. Should be in his hands next week.


Let’s hope it holds up to @Form.

I would really like to try the Maven 2.5x10 1” model and compare it to the Tri Credo 3x9. Looks to be a good set-forget option I can provide to all my no dialing, hunting buddies.

Regarding the original question. I have all 3 of the scopes mentioned. The Maven smokes the SWFA’s in every category but weight IMO. As soon as the RS1.2’s are back in stock I’ll be parting ways with all but one SWFA. The SWFA will always have a spot in my safe,however, they are an unfortunate victim of poor business practices. No warranty support is killing their brand.
It would be great if they offered it in mils.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
 

5811

WKR
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
638
I’m not an expert or prolific shooter. I do have all 3 of those (the Maven is new to me and hasn’t been mounted). As others have said, I think you can’t go wrong with any of them. I’m very optimistic about the new Maven. But I currently don’t think I will let go of the 3-9 or 3-15. (Or the 6x.)
So all that talk about selling a 3-9 was a big tease?!?
 

fwafwow

WKR
Joined
Apr 8, 2018
Messages
5,652
So all that talk about selling a 3-9 was a big tease?!?
Ha! I’m still thinking, but then I wonder why sell the fixed powers - they are so inexpensive and no harm in keeping them. And while the 3-9 was more expensive, as soon as I sell it, I will probably regret it.
 

ericmcd

WKR
Joined
Dec 22, 2020
Messages
425
Ha! I’m still thinking, but then I wonder why sell the fixed powers - they are so inexpensive and no harm in keeping them. And while the 3-9 was more expensive, as soon as I sell it, I will probably regret it.
Well if you decide to sell the 3-9 I'd swap you for my fixed 6x or 3-15 plus the difference in price! Haha
 
Top