Swarovski ATC vs. ATS vs. Kowa 553…Updated 4/26/23!

Trial153

WKR
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
8,187
Location
NY
I just sold my 553. I was going to wait till my spring bear hunts were over however in the three side by side uses, less than three hours total I know….. it was clear what one was more user friendly for me considering eye placement and usable field of view. Image quality i thought was a was a wash most times. However when I was situated just right the 553 had slight edge. Considering I was on chair on the top of my truck cap with both mounted on sturdier then needed tripods. I will give up that slight edge for more usable eye placement space. Especially getting comfortable on a side hill or on uneven terrain without a good seat
 

Steve O

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
2,911
Location
Michigan
As expected a very good write up! I know when I compared my 95 ATX, 65 ATX, and ATC it was a very easy decision to send the 65mm objective down the road.
 

Fun Guy

FNG
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
18
Matt, thank you very much for the review. I do have a question about the photos of all three scopes at 40X. It appears the center tree is a good bit larger in the 553 image compared to the other two. Thoughts?

Thank you.
 

twall13

WKR
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
2,574
Location
Utah
Great write up. I can't say I'm super surprised at the results. I love my little Kowa for what it is, but the eye relief and field of view are certainly big shortcomings. If you only get the spotter out to verify, the Kowa works great. If you rely on your spotter to grid a hillside, the Kowa 553 probably isn't the scope for you. I also didn't realize what a challenge it is to digiscope with it until I got my Kowa 883. It does make sense, given the small field of view.

If the ATC and the 553 were closer on price I think the decision would be a no brainier for most guys. Given the price difference, I think you have to look at your specific use case and make a decision whether it's worth the extra money to you.

Either way, I'm glad we finally have a few options for lightweight scopes with good glass.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
 
OP
Matt Cashell

Matt Cashell

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
4,508
Location
Western MT
Matt, thank you very much for the review. I do have a question about the photos of all three scopes at 40X. It appears the center tree is a good bit larger in the 553 image compared to the other two. Thoughts?

Thank you.

That is an optical illusion because the tree takes up a greater portion of the smaller field of view in the 553.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
640
Just makes you wonder if these reviewers are even looking through the same product...

 
Joined
Jul 20, 2019
Messages
2,242
Why did the Kowa at 40x look closer than the ATC at 40x? It looks like the Kowa was maybe 45x instead of 40x?
 
OP
Matt Cashell

Matt Cashell

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
4,508
Location
Western MT
It is called the Ebbinghaus illusion:

c185e1fc590fec3b8ee4ce8c64882584.jpg
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
545
Really appreciate the follow up review on the ATC. There isn’t a ton of info on these still and so it’s great to have more data. I was originally going to go with the STC since it seems more efficient for packing but the ATC seems much easier to use. Anyone have thoughts on which model makes more sense?
 

Steve O

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
2,911
Location
Michigan
Just makes you wonder if these reviewers are even looking through the same product...


Yeah, to put it politely, that review was flawed…
 
Top