No, I would not. I might “buy” the statement if your authority had some basis for being respected in the “suppressor industry” and had published results done to a “scientific standard.”
As it is, your appeal to authority rings hollow.
But, for the sake of argument, let’s take the best case scenario. Let’s assume that this person was part of the SAAMI board (maybe a minority opinion in the final draft). Or perhaps some person who *should have been* part of the SAAMI board, but was excluded. What is stopping that person from publishing a “here’s why the new SAAMI standard is flawed and here are X number of ways it could be better” article?
Or, for that matter, what is stopping anyone from publishing standards they intend to use? And formulating tests that account for environmental differences.
Again, I am responding to you, but this isn’t directed at you in particular.