Just to confirm, you think the first baffle looks that rough from being struck by the bullet?Looks like you found it. Now, it’s not the suppressor. It’s the attaching mechanism.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just to confirm, you think the first baffle looks that rough from being struck by the bullet?Looks like you found it. Now, it’s not the suppressor. It’s the attaching mechanism.
Just to confirm, you think the first baffle looks that rough from being struck by the bullet?
I had originally went with the hellfire system because I planned to swap suppressors between guns, but then I decided to just buy two suppressors. Should I just go back to the TBAC attachment (if I can find one)?
When they came out with the quick-detach systems they knew they had stacking problems. The suppressor manufacturers increased the size of the hole in the suppressor to try an negate the tolerance stacking problem. I like direct screw on suppressors, not as sexy as the TBAC ect but always quieter, and never a baffle strike if tight.
In your case, you already are committed to some type of an adapter, so use whatever will work best for you. What does the suppressor manufacturer recommend
The quick answer is The size of the hole in the baffles is increased to account for the tolerance stacking of adapters.Direct thread is quieter than other attaching systems? Can you explain that to me
The quick answer is The size of the hole in the baffles is increased to account for the tolerance stacking of adapters.
The quick answer is The size of the hole in the baffles is increased to account for the tolerance stacking of adapters.
Telling me I'm wrong does not make me wrong. So now prove me wrong.The vast majority of recent can designs have a hub that makes it modular for whatever attachment method someone wants to use so fair to say there is no difference in baffle hole diameter between most recent designs regardless of attachment method. That said, i could see most DT models having a little more volume inside the blast baffle than those with an adapter brake or flash hider that extends into the can so maybe a hair more suppression due to that?
Telling me I'm wrong does not make me wrong. So not prove me wrong.
So you’re saying they make 2 different baffle stacks?I don't care about the design of the suppressor or the adapter. Suppressors today have a larger hole in the baffles to allow for lousy designed adapters. Any one that knows anything about suppressors knows the bigger the hole is the less efficient the suppressor is. Suppressors today are like fishing lures, they have a lot of CNC cut designs on the outside of the tube which catches the eye of the buyer and does nothing in the way of suppressing the sound. My original statement stands. "The quick answer is The size of the hole in the baffles is increased to account for the tolerance stacking of adapters."
How would direct thread be quieter then?I didn't say anything like that. I know better.