Suppressed Group Sizes (Need Help)

[BrentH]

Looks like you found it. Now, it’s not the suppressor. It’s the attaching mechanism.

Just to confirm, you think the first baffle looks that rough from being struck by the bullet?

 

[Q_Sertorius]

Just to confirm, you think the first baffle looks that rough from being struck by the bullet?

That’s what it looks like to me. I think the adapter you are using needs to be replaced. If you complain to whichever company you got it from, they might replace it without charge. That’s what Banish did for me.


____________________
“Keep on keepin’ on…”

 

[Dan Carey]

Its hard to tell from the photo, could be. Most of the time the strikes will be half way down the tube and worse at the end cap, thats what I think i'm seeing with yours.

 

[BrentH]

I had originally went with the hellfire system because I planned to swap suppressors between guns, but then I decided to just buy two suppressors. Should I just go back to the TBAC attachment (if I can find one)?

 

[Q_Sertorius]

I had originally went with the hellfire system because I planned to swap suppressors between guns, but then I decided to just buy two suppressors. Should I just go back to the TBAC attachment (if I can find one)?

I think so. The simpler the system the better.


____________________
“Keep on keepin’ on…”

 

[Dan Carey]

When they came out with the quick-detach systems they knew they had stacking problems. The suppressor manufacturers increased the size of the hole in the suppressor to try an negate the tolerance stacking problem. I like direct screw on suppressors, not as sexy as the TBAC ect but always quieter, and never a baffle strike if tight.
In your case, you already are committed to some type of an adapter, so use whatever will work best for you. What does the suppressor manufacturer recommend

 

[justin davis]

Must be the attachment system. I’ve always used the TBAC CB mounts. They seem to work well and no issues for me

When they came out with the quick-detach systems they knew they had stacking problems. The suppressor manufacturers increased the size of the hole in the suppressor to try an negate the tolerance stacking problem. I like direct screw on suppressors, not as sexy as the TBAC ect but always quieter, and never a baffle strike if tight.
In your case, you already are committed to some type of an adapter, so use whatever will work best for you. What does the suppressor manufacturer recommend

Direct thread is quieter than other attaching systems? Can you explain that to me

 

[BrentH]

Am I correct that I do not need to “time” the CB brake if I don’t plan to shoot it without the suppressor attached? i.e. the suppressor doesn’t care what position the brake ports are located.

 

[Dan Carey]

Thats correct, timing only has an effect on the dirt around you. Unless the manufacturer has a blast chamber that need a certain directional gas flow.

 

[Dan Carey]

Direct thread is quieter than other attaching systems? Can you explain that to me

The quick answer is The size of the hole in the baffles is increased to account for the tolerance stacking of adapters.

 

[justin davis]

The quick answer is The size of the hole in the baffles is increased to account for the tolerance stacking of adapters.

Ok So Thunderbeast when they do a “direct thread can.” From what I understand they glue in a cb mount. And then that threads onto the barrel directly. So it’s the exact same as using a cb mount that is attached to a barrel already?

 

[E.Shell]

I have a ThunderBeast Magnus that came with some sort of QD adapter. It was not glued in, I easily removed the QD device and installed a direct thread HUB adapter.