Stupid poll: Which rifle?

Which rifle?

  • 6.5 PRC

  • 300 WSM


Results are only viewable after voting.

SwiftShot

WKR
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Messages
477
The only difference really between many match and hunting bullets is some process for increased core retention on the hunting bullet. I blasted a cow ag point blank range and that increased retention did not hold up well. Cow died instantly and bullet worked fine. It would have been the same result with a match bullet. At range they perform pretty close.

Would I hunt grizzly with a match, hell no because I might need to go from the skull to the vitals. Shooting an animal broadside really comes down to hitting where you aim.

On to the question, 300 WSM is awesome so is the 6.5 PRC. At range if you are using 140 plus in the PRC and 180s in the WSM. The PRC will catch it.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
5
Shoot each rifle from normal hunting positions at 3-500yrds. Those targets will tell you the best option.

The 300 WSM is not more terminally effective than the 6.5 PRC. It's more recoil to do the same thing. I hunted with a lightweight, unbraked 300 WSM for the last 3 years. Killed deer, elk, and bear from 200-1170 yards and it works great, but I never saw a wound channel distinguishably larger than what my previous 6.5 CMs made. Both were shooting heavy for caliber ELD M. That led me back to a lighter recoiling caliber that will do everything the 300 WSM does, but I get to watch my hits.
Shoot the one you shoot best in the field. 1 lb of rifle weight isn't that big of a deal.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
I would respectfully say the bullet speed and drop are similar between the 2 calibers, but disagree that terminal performance is indeed different unless you are shooting a 147 grain bullet out of the WSM, which no one is. So the "terminal" velocity is similar but the terminal energy in foot pounds is very different. With the 300 wsm delivering more energy at every range than the PRC. Not saying that the 6.5 PRC is bad, the hunter just needs to know the effective range of their rifle and bullet combo. The old standby of 2000 foot pounds for an Elk and 1500 foot pounds for a deer should be a statistic we think about when considering trying to kill anything bigger than a steel plate at longer yardage. The industry has developed better calibers for better rifles with amazing scopes. If you take the time to figure out how many MOAs to adjust in elevation, please also consider the energy of the bullet at that range and its lethality.
 
OP
ScreamingPotato
Joined
Jun 15, 2017
Messages
2,401
Location
San Antonio
I would respectfully say the bullet speed and drop are similar between the 2 calibers, but disagree that terminal performance is indeed different unless you are shooting a 147 grain bullet out of the WSM, which no one is. So the "terminal" velocity is similar but the terminal energy in foot pounds is very different. With the 300 wsm delivering more energy at every range than the PRC. Not saying that the 6.5 PRC is bad, the hunter just needs to know the effective range of their rifle and bullet combo. The old standby of 2000 foot pounds for an Elk and 1500 foot pounds for a deer should be a statistic we think about when considering trying to kill anything bigger than a steel plate at longer yardage. The industry has developed better calibers for better rifles with amazing scopes. If you take the time to figure out how many MOAs to adjust in elevation, please also consider the energy of the bullet at that range and its lethality.
According to my calculations plugging info into Strelok the PRC is showing 1980 ft lbs at 300 yards and WSM is showing 1940 ft lbs at 800 yards.
2k for Elk and 1.5k for deer, guessing a very general guideline for Elk Cow may be roughly in between eh?
I'm sure almost anything works in the lungs but I've always planned for the worst not relied on everything being optimal because that's not always the case.
 

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,048
I would respectfully say the bullet speed and drop are similar between the 2 calibers, but disagree that terminal performance is indeed different unless you are shooting a 147 grain bullet out of the WSM, which no one is. So the "terminal" velocity is similar but the terminal energy in foot pounds is very different. With the 300 wsm delivering more energy at every range than the PRC. Not saying that the 6.5 PRC is bad, the hunter just needs to know the effective range of their rifle and bullet combo. The old standby of 2000 foot pounds for an Elk and 1500 foot pounds for a deer should be a statistic we think about when considering trying to kill anything bigger than a steel plate at longer yardage. The industry has developed better calibers for better rifles with amazing scopes. If you take the time to figure out how many MOAs to adjust in elevation, please also consider the energy of the bullet at that range and its lethality.
Yawn. Energy schmenergy. Bullets dont kills with energy. Just shoot the gun you shoot best in field positions. Anything else is nonsense. The bullet going where it needs to go and disrupting vital tissue is what matters, not match vs not or some silly arbitrary energy figure.
 
Last edited:

SDHNTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
7,048
According to my calculations plugging info into Strelok the PRC is showing 1980 ft lbs at 300 yards and WSM is showing 1940 ft lbs at 800 yards.
2k for Elk and 1.5k for deer, guessing a very general guideline for Elk Cow may be roughly in between eh?
I'm sure almost anything works in the lungs but I've always planned for the worst not relied on everything being optimal because that's not always the case.
Don’t waste your time calculating silly stuff, especially energy.

Go take a box or two of ammo out with each gun. Put a 8-10” plate up at whatever your max anticipated distance is. One target for each gun. Fire the same amount of rounds out of each gun. Prone, sitting/kneeling off sticks, backpack, tripod/bipod, whatever your pleasure. Then go count the hits. The one with the most hits is the one you take.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
5
I would respectfully say the bullet speed and drop are similar between the 2 calibers, but disagree that terminal performance is indeed different unless you are shooting a 147 grain bullet out of the WSM, which no one is. So the "terminal" velocity is similar but the terminal energy in foot pounds is very different. With the 300 wsm delivering more energy at every range than the PRC. Not saying that the 6.5 PRC is bad, the hunter just needs to know the effective range of their rifle and bullet combo. The old standby of 2000 foot pounds for an Elk and 1500 foot pounds for a deer should be a statistic we think about when considering trying to kill anything bigger than a steel plate at longer yardage. The industry has developed better calibers for better rifles with amazing scopes. If you take the time to figure out how many MOAs to adjust in elevation, please also consider the energy of the bullet at that range and it's lethality.

Energy needed is nothing but a bunch of regurgitated fuddlore who ha.

The wound cavity created by your bullet at impact velocity is what you should be thinking about.
Fuddlore?? Ya, ok. Isaac Newton was just a chump. Peace.
 

Colby

WKR
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
307
Location
Sandy Oregon
According to my calculations plugging info into Strelok the PRC is showing 1980 ft lbs at 300 yards and WSM is showing 1940 ft lbs at 800 yards.
2k for Elk and 1.5k for deer, guessing a very general guideline for Elk Cow may be roughly in between eh?
I'm sure almost anything works in the lungs but I've always planned for the worst not relied on everything being optimal because that's not always the case.
If you have an open mind and are interested in learning more about terminal ballistics I suggest the 223 thread as a good place for start, not to keep beating the 223 drum but there is a lot of info there that is very helpful.
I grew up reading petersons hunting and guns & ammo with all the ft lb requirement for different critters and went with it for a long time. Have owned and killed a good bit of critters with big magnums.
The real key in my opinion is that a guy legitimately has to have an open mind, just because one cartridge has more ft lbs of energy than another does not mean it will make a bigger wound. The projectile determines the wound.
Pick an optimized projectile for a cartridge that you can really manage recoil with, i.e. you’re still looking through the scope when the bullet gets to the target and run with it. I would bet the heavier prc will give you a better chance of doing this than the wsm. 233/6cm/6.5cm would be even easier to manage.
This is not stuff that I cooked up on my own, I have been fortunate to have been helped along by some very knowledgeable people from this site.
There really is a wealth of knowledge available here if a guy wants to soak it up.
At the end of the day not my monkey not my circus but you seem like you’re wanting to ask legitimate questions that there are good answers for.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
1,806
Location
Front Range, Colorado
It takes very little energy to destroy enough tissue to kill and elk. Under 100 lb ft actually.
Don't bring up Newton if you don't want to go down the technical road and present data.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
 
Top