You opinion/conjecture, one of many was that the P365 is a far better carry weapon than the P320. There is a lot of ‘it depends’ on that statement. But you pass it off as fact. Typical from what I’ve seen.
Typical from what or who?
To qualify that statement-
The P365 has a better mechanical trigger system than the P320 which totally eliminates the drop firing problem- regardless of whether it’s a current issue, it’s also less complicated making repairs and armorers work easier; it’s smaller trigger group allows a much wider size and shape variety in grip modules, it’s thinner profile is easier to conceal for all people than a P320, and if the grip is too small for those with abnormally large hands there are much larger grips available.
In general they have as good or better mechanical precision than P320’s though P320’s are quite good when new; and the P365 does not suffer from the relatively common lockup issue that causes degradation in precision (group size) after 5,000-8,000 rounds that the P320’s tend to exibit.
I’m not sure what basis someone could make that the P320 is “better” than a P365 for carry? Maybe ubiquity and availability of very light triggers?
What’s acceptable to me? I’ve already stated, I’ve got a one of a few Gen 3’s with zero FTF/F in over 10k rounds…freedom remans even. I owned a p365 the week it hit the shelves and I’ve had 5 failure in that time with far far fewer rounds.
Saying you haven’t had a malfunction in 10k rounds isn’t saying what is acceptable to you. But, if we go by your statement above, then 10,000 MRBS is the acceptable limit for you?
So what are you going to do if the pistol malfunctions twice in the next 5,000 rounds? That’ll drop it below the 10k MRBS standard. Will you then say 5,000 MRBS is ok?
I’m sure I’m in the minority though…Because you say so. Torture test striker fired pistols then, let’s see how reliable the sig p series is compared to the G17/19.
You used large agency/govern contracts as a proof that Glock is better. I have pointed out that not only is that a fallacy (appeal to authority) but, it also doesn’t work as Sig has absolutely dominated the large agency and government contracts for new pistols not only in the US the last 3-5 years, but across the western world.
You’ve already admitted that the G17/19 platform is probably the most proven reliable striker fire in existence…not sure why you insist on carrying this on. Nothing I’ve stated is factually inaccurate, and I freely admit when something is opinion can fact supported by the data. You should try it.
Because your position has been based on fallacies and incorrect assumptions. As an example you stated-
Or better yet, buy a G19 and have a pistol that doesn’t go bang when it hits the ground.
Never heard of glocks firing without the trigger being pressed, can’t say the same the sig brand. even with the 365 not having the recall the 320 did, it’s got plenty of known issues. you willing to trust that a broken firing pin (known issue) isn’t going to put one in your leg?
And several more incorrect statements- that’s what I was addressing. The Sig P320 currently on the market is no more prone to firing when dropped than a Glock. Never mind that even the early ones had to be setup a specific way for them fire when “dropped”, and it’s a way that no manufacturer at that time tested for. And as I said before-the 90’s were rife with stories of Glocks “just going off” including the lawsuits. But people don’t remember or weren’t alive then. It’s was BS then, and it’s BS now. It’s people trying not to get fired for having a negligent discharge in nearly all cases, and for blaming the gun when an incorrect model holster was used in a couple others.
Notice I didn’t say anything to others that said they weren’t comfortable with it, etc. I quoted you as you were making definitive statements about safety and reliability that are not reality.
