Sierra Heavy TMK 6MM Testing

Yep, looks about there.

Yeah, then it’s not low enough case fill to be concerned about IMO. I’ve never had issue with angled shooting or erratic velocities or anything. But then again I don’t seat the bullet up the case neck, I want the whole neck grabbing the bullet.

I say rock on, I’ve gone through at least three jugs of H4350 in 243/6CM in the 41-41.5 range.
 
Pretty pleased with the 107’s. Went and checked my ballistics and my drop chart is right on using sierras BC with my actual velocity.

Shot a 3”ish seven shot group at 500 and then backed up to 730 and shot three shots right at 2” holding 3/4 mil for wind, last two were 3/4” apart.

Final load:
41.5gr H4350
Peterson Brass
CCI BR2
Coal 2.918”
.022 off lands
2760fps

1:8, Tikka 16” barrel

IMG_7499.jpeg

IMG_7497.jpeg
 
Pretty pleased with the 107’s. Went and checked my ballistics and my drop chart is right on using sierras BC with my actual velocity.

Shot a 3”ish seven shot group at 500 and then backed up to 730 and shot three shots right at 2” holding 3/4 mil for wind, last two were 3/4” apart.

Final load:
41.5gr H4350
Peterson Brass
CCI BR2
Coal 2.918”
.022 off lands
2760fps

1:8, Tikka 16” barrel

View attachment 1036600

View attachment 1036661
At 2.918” those gotta be barely in the case don’t they? I have some loaded for tomorrow. 2.785” was right about where the boat tail hits the neck/shoulder junction.
 
At 2.918” those gotta be barely in the case don’t they? I have some loaded for tomorrow. 2.785” was right about where the boat tail hits the neck/shoulder junction.
I’m using M+ (6.5cm mags) they wouldn’t fit in the factory .243 M mag, the 108ELDM was right at mag length and it’s a shorter bullet.
 
At 2.918” those gotta be barely in the case don’t they? I have some loaded for tomorrow. 2.785” was right about where the boat tail hits the neck/shoulder junction.
This one is loaded to 2.880" for a Tikka 243. You can see that the boat tail starts really close to that junction. At 2.918" his are just over 1/32" further out.....not much.
IMG_2814.JPG
 
Not sure if this belongs in the other TMK thread or this one, but i got to shoot the 107’s today.

Tikka action
18” benchmark barrel spun by soldier mountain arms
Tbac Magnus suppressor
Xlr chassis

Hopefully the notes in the picture make sense. Ran a ladder with H4350 and N560 to see if I’d hit pressure and to check velocity. Never loaded 560 in this case before so wanted to try it. Decent speed but accuracy was not near as good as H4350 so i won’t pursue it any more.

It’s obvious these bullets want to shoot. Even jumping 150 thou in my chamber. 0.7” for the 7 shot ladder across 3 grains of powder and then a 3 shot group with 1 charge that was sub 0.3”. Never hit obvious pressure but i imagine it was close at 42.0.

Saved 10 at 40.5 to shoot at distance. Plate was 600 yards and wind was gusting 15-30 MPH so ignore the horizontal. About 4” of vertical roughly. BC from Sierra website just below water line.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2694.jpeg
    IMG_2694.jpeg
    362.5 KB · Views: 66
  • IMG_2688.jpeg
    IMG_2688.jpeg
    511.6 KB · Views: 66
Similar to others, I found the new 107 TMK to shoot well with multiple loads/powders. Way better results compared to the 95TMK with the same powders. I still haven’t found a great load for the 95TMK yet…

I’m going to hold off on sharing charge weights as I had a few blown primers (which was a big surprise and a new issue for me). For the record, all of these powder charges were below book max if there was book data available. If there wasn’t book data, then I used slightly lower charges than others have reported with comparable bullets (107 SMK, 108 ELDM). I’ll be loading some more up with lower charges and then hope to work my way back up.

All 107’s were loaded to 2.860” in an M+ mag as I couldn’t chamber them at 2.880”. I do wonder if I should load shorter next time, as I’m thinking a lack of jump on a few rounds that ended up slightly longer than planned could have been the reason for the occasional blown primers that happened with multiple powders at safe charge weights.

Tikka 243, cut to 16.5”
Once fired norma brass
CCI 200 LR primers

Powders tried:
H4350
H1000
IMR4831
WIN760

IMG_2188.jpeg

IMG_2193.jpeg
 
All 107’s were loaded to 2.860” in an M+ mag as I couldn’t chamber them at 2.880”. I do wonder if I should load shorter next time, as I’m thinking a lack of jump on a few rounds that ended up slightly longer than planned could have been the reason for the occasional blown primers that happened with multiple powders at safe charge weights.
So you don’t know the COAL measurement where the bullet touches the lands? I would start by finding that measurement and/or the ogive measurement with a comparator…and then start load development.
 
Back
Top