I'm just about to squeeze the trigger on selling my Swaro 10x42 NL Pures ... to keep my Leica Noctivid 10x42s.
Anyone have any last minute reasons why I should reconsider???
Below are my reasons for keeping the Noctivids over the Pures. It's not an in-depth review, just what I've noticed using both. I've had each pair out scouting and harvesting several animals, so this is just what I've noticed from having each binoculars for 2 hunting seasons.
Pros for the Pures
-Field of view is noticeably larger (it might even be too much FOV, for my eyes I can't even scan to the edge of the FOV when they're on a tripod and eyecups all the way down)
-Feel lighter in the hand and on the chest
Pros for the Noctivids
-To me, the image & color contrast is sharper.
-Glare control is much better than the Pures. In the morning/evenings when the sun is right on the horizon the Pures have pretty bad glare compared to the Noctivids ... this is the main reason I prefer the Noctivids
...
Anyone have any last minute reasons why I should reconsider???
Below are my reasons for keeping the Noctivids over the Pures. It's not an in-depth review, just what I've noticed using both. I've had each pair out scouting and harvesting several animals, so this is just what I've noticed from having each binoculars for 2 hunting seasons.
Pros for the Pures
-Field of view is noticeably larger (it might even be too much FOV, for my eyes I can't even scan to the edge of the FOV when they're on a tripod and eyecups all the way down)
-Feel lighter in the hand and on the chest
Pros for the Noctivids
-To me, the image & color contrast is sharper.
-Glare control is much better than the Pures. In the morning/evenings when the sun is right on the horizon the Pures have pretty bad glare compared to the Noctivids ... this is the main reason I prefer the Noctivids
...