Where in this thread was that questioned?
Which was asked in response to
I asked because beyond paying taxes within and to that state what else entitles you to benefits of residency of said state and why?
Why don’t you just make your point because I must be too fucktarded to follow what you are asking or the point you are trying to make.
I don't understand why people struggle with the ideas within the Declaration of Independence on which this nation was founded. Rights originate from our Creator to the Individual, period the end. The rights of the state whether that be the federal government or government of WY are derived from the Individuals from which they govern per the Federal and State Constitutions. You see the rights of the state are explicitly limited to what was explicitly given to it within a Constitution. Otherwise the Rights of the Individual takes precedence over the state. It's understandable that most don't understand this because this is the very thing that made America a radical new concept in the governance of man, not the self governance BS that public education pedals.
I'm honestly not making any point here. I genuinely asked my question in earnest. When we're making such a big deal of residency the question seemed like it should be answered first.
Fair enough allow me to semi stealth edit.
So by this logic, someone doesn't need to have any regard for residency, seasons, game limits....?!?!
Are you asking what residency of a state is? I seriously do not understand the question you are so earnestly asking.
Exactly what part of that lead you to this conclusion? I certainly didn't mean for it to.
Kind of yes. I'm asking specific questions in that regard, because I explicitly am not asking how some state legally defines it. Does that make sense?
How could one define what a resident of a state is without defining it based on what a state says it is?
Correct. Other than in carrying out the powers explicitly given to it by the Individual per the Constitution. Because the mob is the greatest threat to the Rights of the Individual we must construct governments (the 2nd greatest threat to the Rights of the Individual) to protect the Rights of the Individual such that a functioning society can be created from the mob. In order to have governance finite Rights must be surrendered so that the state can be given the powers necessary to carry out its critical functions. The state is given these powers per a Constitution. This is the summary of the genesis of a Constitutionally Limited Republic.
It's a pity I don't hate any member of the Idaho Bar enough to refer you to them.
The only thing you are conceding is credibility.
When I hear some one is stirring up the drama, I instantly think it's you.
As a hard rule allowing the state a monopoly on defining what is and isn't is a sure recipe for tyranny.
