Seeking Best Idaho Fish and Game Attorney

[CorbLand]

Facts don’t care about your feelings.

 

[ThorM465]

Let me get this straight. Owns a house in Challis that is getting remodeled, while he's living in his Utah house, and he thought it qualified him to be an Idaho resident.
Sketchy stuff like that is exactly why they go after people like you.

Sketchy? Imagine taxing a man on his property and not allowing him to access the benefits his taxes pay for. Wait a minute...

 

[The Guide]

Sketchy? Imagine taxing a man on his property and not allowing him to access the benefits his taxes pay for. Wait a minute...

Lots of people have 2nd homes in other states where they don't reside and don't get resident benefits. You don't have to own property to get resident benefits, just have to be a RESIDENT.

Jay

 

[The Guide]

Sketchy? Imagine taxing a man on his property and not allowing him to access the benefits his taxes pay for. Wait a minute...

Even if you own property in Wyoming, you can't hunt the wilderness unless you're a resident...

Jay

 

[Steve300xcw]

OP sounds like a california transplant

 

[ThorM465]

Not as much as you can...

I have several friends who don't meet residency requirements for a hunting license in any state

Seems like a clear indicator that the rules in some states are broken.

 

[Wyo_hntr]

Seems like a clear indicator that the rules in some states are broken.

You can access it all you want. You just refuse to understand that.

 

[Axlrod]

AND NO I DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO READ THROUGH MY WHOLE POST TO LOOK FOR LITTLE TYPOS AND RUN ON SENTENCES SO UNDOUBTEDLY THE FOLKS WHO LEAVE BULLYING REMARKS ABOUT ME HOMESCHOOLING MY KIDS AND HOW I SHOULDN'T DUE TO SOME STUPID ENGLISH RUEBRICK REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE KEYBOARD WARRIORS CAN JUST LET KARMA TAKE ITS COURSE.

Well I didn't read most of your post, but all caps is just wrong! If you are going to homeschool your kids, you most certainly should have a better handle on english than whoever homeschooled you!
PS: There is no such word as ruebrick (I had to Google it)

 

[ThorM465]

Lots of people have 2nd homes in other states where they don't reside and don't get resident benefits. You don't have to own property to get resident benefits, just have to be a RESIDENT.

Jay

Someone can own nothing, have no investment in the future of state, and provide no value to that society and enjoy its benefits. However, a man who owns property and has an investment in the future of that society is entitled to nothing. Excellent system.

Even if you own property in Wyoming, you can't hunt the wilderness unless you're a resident...

Jay

Oh d**n you caught me with that one. I take back everything I said that had absolutely zero to do with access to federal land.

I'm surrounded in a sea of F***tards who should have been sw****wed.

 

[CorbLand]

Sketchy? Imagine taxing a man on his property and not allowing him to access the benefits his taxes pay for. Wait a minute...

Someone correct me, but I don’t think any of property taxes goes to fund Fish and Game.

 

[ThorM465]

Someone correct me, but I don’t think any of property taxes goes to fund Fish and Game.

Let's assume that's true. Then why is residency a requirement and exactly what about being a resident entitles you to special privileges? Honest question.

 

[KurtR]

 

[CorbLand]

Let's assume that's true. Then why is residency a requirement and exactly what about being a resident entitles you to special privileges? Honest question.

Because animals are held in trust by a state for the residents of said state?

You also don’t have to do much assuming. I am 99% sure that no property tax funds go to fund Fish and Game.

 

[Wyo_hntr]

Because animals are held in trust by a state for the residents of said state?

You are making too much sense. He resists that vehemently.

 

[DAOutfitters208]

sooo if you could save $12000 and only got $150 ticket, that would be a better deal right? Wait wrong thread never mind.

I’m thinking $12000 buys many years non resident Idaho tags.

 

[The Guide]

Someone can own nothing, have no investment in the future of state, and provide no value to that society and enjoy its benefits. However, a man who owns property and has an investment in the future of that society is entitled to nothing. Excellent system.


Oh d**n you caught me with that one. I take back everything I said that had absolutely zero to do with access to federal land.

I'm surrounded in a sea of F***tards who should have been sw****wed.

We do not live in a feudal society with privileges only given to those who own land. The state owns the animal population and gives their residents privilege based on state law. The state ALLOWS nonresidents privileges based upon policy. Nobody has protected rights in any state they aren't a resident of. It isn't hard for an intelligent person to understand the concept. Your intelligence level may very.

Jay

 

[ThorM465]

Because animals are held in trust by a state for the residents of said state?

You also don’t have to do much assuming. I am 99% sure that no property tax funds go to fund Fish and Game.

You are making too much sense. He resists that vehemently.

So residency is a requirement "because animals are held in trust by a state..." I feel like Matt Walsh must have when shooting what is a woman.

When I said let's assume that's true I was literally conceding that point to you in an attempt to politely move forward in a productive conversation. I don't understand the vitriol. I mean I could guess, but let's just say I'm giving the benefit of the doubt.

 

[ThorM465]

We do not live in a feudal society with privileges only given to those who own land. The state owns the animal population and gives their residents privilege based on state law. The state ALLOWS nonresidents privileges based upon policy. Nobody has protected rights in any state they aren't a resident of. It isn't hard for an intelligent person to understand the concept. Your intelligence level may very.

Jay

What is or who is the State?

 

[CorbLand]

So residency is a requirement "because animals are held in trust by a state..." I feel like Matt Walsh must have when shooting what is a woman.

When I said let's assume that's true I was literally conceding that point to you in an attempt to politely move forward in a productive conversation. I don't understand the vitriol. I mean I could guess, but let's just say I'm giving the benefit of the doubt.

Yes, animals are held in trust by a state. This is not up to subjectivity. That is a fact.
Yes, one must be a resident of a state to get resident tags and/or licenses.
The State is generally the government of that state and the government is made up of elected or appointed residents of that state.


Really not that hard of a concept here and I am running out of crayons.

 

[Jason Snyder]

Resident status within a state can also vary by what the resident privilege is for. It’s harder to be a resident of MT or WY for tuition purposes than it is to hunt or fish.

The states get to decide how do define what a resident is and for what privilege. I dont understand why some folks struggle so much with the concept of individual states rights.