S2H winter class 2026 observations and lessons learned

Formidilosus

Not A Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
14,582
Shoot2Hunt held a Winter version of the 0-600 Yard Hunting Course last week. Below will follow some of the notable experiences/information.

@Tommyhaak, @WDO, @Nine Banger, @RancherJohn, @Cliff Gray, @longrangelead, @Livinfree77, @nephewjephew, @24valve

Were all in attendance and I hope they share their observations.


Weather for the week:

The first couple of days was warm- 50° F and windy. Then the temps dropped on day 3 or 4, and it snowed approx 5”, and got to below 0° F for lows. Highs those days were single digit or in the teens.


Early in the week-
IMG_4142.jpeg


Middle of the week-
IMG_4143.jpeg


Later-
1771876229393.jpeg



Equipment and training:

This was class was a mixed bag of conditions. Not nearly the cold and snow of last years, but the rapid and dramatic change caused issues all its own.

Most do not, shoot, backpack camp, or hunt in real winter conditions, though many claim to. This is reflected in their belief about equipment, clothing, rifles/optics, packs, etc. that fall flat when tested. Those I hunt with do- to the tune of 20,000+ rounds a season, and we have killed 15-20 elk and near countless deer in deep winter conditions.

Most used Tikka’s, however there were two R700 pattern rifles, one MRC Marshall, and three UM/S2H Raven actions used. Also a Blaser R8 for a bit.

Everyone got to see in real life the difference in rifle platforms when actually used in the field.



Clothing:

This class had a heavy trend of natural material clothing more than last years. Wool sweaters and pants were common, and it was a veritable Ranger Sweater convention.
Base layers were mostly standard wool, with a couple woolnets.

There were a few proto true winter down parkas for people to wear and try. 24oz in a true large, 14oz down. Specifically made to work with a bino harness. There is nothing like them on the market. A true one and done cold weather jacket. The general response was “this fuggin thing is awesome/the best I’ve ever worn”.


Much like last year, wool, down, waxed cotton, and Ventile cotton materials seemed to rule the roost. There were synthetics of the standard Kuiu, Stone Glacier, etc persuasion; but overall the materials seemed to show as good or better performance.



Feet:

Foot issues were way less this year- partly due to less extreme weather, but mostly due to most people having Mukluks, or Vivo Tundras. Even on the days with single digit or negative temps, those with Mukluks and Tundras were completely fine. A few tried their regular shoes/boots a couple days where we were moving more, but most had to swap back to the Mukluks/Tundras.

The Vivo Barefoot Tundra ESC’s are likely the best choice overall for warmth and traction. They are not quite as good as the Steger Arctic due to a very thin sole, but are about the same as the standard Mukluks they make. I will try a foam footbed that can be slipped in for when I am stationary for long periods. They weren’t cold ever, but the sole would get cool when standing on ice for long periods without moving.


Socks are best when fluffy and thicker, and boots must be loose enough all-round to not squish your feet at all. Good fluffy merino works fine. Alpaca, and Camel wool are better, and several had the Mongolian versions.



Baselayers:

No surprises here- synthetic dries faster, merino is warmer and more comfortable. Woolnet generally is the best of both worlds. The layer touching one’s skin needs to be extremely thin for quick drying. Most seemed to be wearing regular merino base layers, and really their issues came in the rewarming drill.





Outer layer:

Most seemed to be using Fjallraven Keb Trousers, or other wool pants such as the Varustaleka TST’s, Big Bills, and Micklegaard.

A few wore shells are, but they lose water repellency very quickly, and so not dry out all that fast. The Kebs are great with the G1000 waxed canvas portions, but are a bit thin for below 0° F use. The modern wool pants are the best overall pants that I have seen for below 45° F or so. Very warm even when wet, breath well, fit well, durable.



Mid layers:

A mix of synthetic and wool fleeces, but a lot of wool sweaters. Almost everyone had and wore woolen sweaters this year and I think most were very pleased with them. There were 5 or 6 people that wore the Atlantic Rancher Ranger Sweater- still the best sweater I’ve seen and used.

We generally see people that live and work in very cold winter conditions (I.E. Finland, Scandinavia, etc.) trend towards wool sweaters for a top mid layer.
There are several reasons for that. One is just simple longevity and durability- lots of “lightweight” backpacking and hunting clothing have relatively short lifespans/usefulness. Good natural materials just last year after year- quality wool sweaters last years/decades.
As well, they are more comfortable- especially under other layers. They feel less clammy when damp, they breathe very well, they don’t stink, they are more comfortable in a broader range of weather, warmer, etc, etc.
Not to be misunderstood- modern synthetic clothing definitely has its place and uses, but it is a far more narrow range of uses than marketing and people try to push. For extremely high exertion, short duration use- it works very well. For continuous living in, and thriving in the elements- not as well.



Insulation/puffy layers:

Both synthetic and down were used and there were a variety of brands/makes/models.
Despite marketing and common belief, synthetic is not all around superior to quality down. Synthetic is less warm, heavier, bulkier, and with a drastically shorter lifespan for full insulation. The lifespan of a synthetic puffy is measured in weeks, not months or years when used everyday- they lose loft very, very quickly. What they are good at is durability with tears and rips- so for range use that is what I/we tend to use.
Several used surplus US military ECWS puff jacket and pants. They are heavy and bulky and lose half their loft pretty quickly, but can get beat up all day every day and not get shredded. For the general training/shooting they are a good choice.
For actually carrying and using when hunting/backpacking, good quality down is far superior.

This class predominantly used down insulation from a variety of makers.

A note on insulation- there’s a very large difference between “warm when moving, or stationary for short periods”, and “warm when stationary for long periods and living in it”. You need far more insulation for all day comfort than most jackets/pants. A jacket with 5oz of down fill with a base layer and a fleece isn’t working for 0° F weather all day. For true cold weather 10+ ounces of high quality down in a parka is required.


I have been trying to get a purpose built puffy jacket made for years. @Ryan Avery and I have been working with a company for over a year now, and we had 5 proto jackets to be used for the class- 1x gen 1, and 4x gen 2’s.

The jackets designed as they should be- cut long in front and back with a long tail, made specifically to go over a bino harness and allow access to it, kangaroo pocket on front for hands, real hood that stays in place, etc. 14oz high quality down, and weighs 24oz in true large. These aren’t just for “extreme conditions”. They work great in anything from 40’ish degrees and below for static use. And they allow the ridiculous 26 layers of clothing nonsense to stop- base layer, mid layer, puffy. Done.



Gloves and hats:

All kinds were brought and used. Like the mid-layer, there were trends based on where people were from/how much experience they get in winter. The temps weren’t as extreme this year and so for most of the class, shooting in gloves wasn’t required. For the days it was, most used fleece liners, mechanic gloves, etc.

Wool and fleece liners, with leather or down mittens, leather mittens with gauntlets and felted wool liners, and several with the surplus Arctic mittens were used. @longrangelead used Mountain Goat mittens/gauntlets.


For shooting thin fleece gloves suck due to slipping and lack of grip. Thin leather gloves, especially with a thin wool lining (Hestra deer skin wool tricot) work best. For insulted gloves- fingered gloves suck. You must keep all your fingered together for them to share warmth. Higher gauntlet style mittens with felted wool liners are very warm, durable and functional- surplus Artic Flyer Mittens are the overall best I have used.

The ultimate is beaver, coyote, bison, caribou, and especially seal skin mittens/gauntlets. They have no equal.


Hats- wool beanies/tobogans. Not acrylic or synthetic. Hand knit, wool beanies are the way for most. I and the other teacher again wore hand knit wool versions that a forum members wife made and gave to us- spectacular. I also used the same Turkish sheep skin/fur hat from last year, and Luke last year- it works fantastically. Head was never cold at all.

Only @Nine Banger wore a face mask that I can recall.



Ground insulation:

Normal shooting mats with everyone’s down puff jackets and pants worked fine for this class.



Sleeping bags:

Not camping out, only during the rewarming drill were bags used. There was one synthetic bag. Everything else was water resistant down. Quality down bags are the way for all the reasons that applies to puffy jackets/pants.


More on clothing and sleeping bags in the rewarming portion to come.



Cont.
 
Hard Gear:



Packs:


Packs used were Exo K4’s with the Teratorn bag. One Kifaru that I remember.

Most did not use the wings in the Teratorn the whole time due to the little gear being carried in them, which was interesting- but the bags worked well regardless.
Overall most seemed to learn that having to undue multiple straps, open the main bag up, undue buckles, etc to reach puff suits, tripods, spotters/binos, etc. is just silly and sucks as a user. The couple that used the wings on the bag showed a noticeable advantage in speed and ease of access to equipment.




Skis and snowshoes:

Were not used this class.



Rifles:

Mostly Tikka T3’s. 2x Remington based rifles/actions (1x Seekins PH3, 1x Defiance IIRC @WDO), 2x Tikka M595’s, 1x MRC Marshall, 1x Blaser R8 for a bit, and 3x UM/S2H Ravens. A smattering of others were used randomly for a little while.


All Tikkas in this class had factory trigger springs, all were taken apart and reassembled per our standard- there were no issues. Two or the rental 223 Tikkas were out in cases last June at the last summer class sopping wet- shooters there will remember. They had not been shot or cleaned since purely because the were forgot about. One worked completely fine with just a bit of surface rust that wiped off. The other in a much thicker case had more surface rust, but also rust in the chamber. It also had a stick get chambered in it right off the bat. This rifle the cases were getting stuck due to the debris.

This is what the cases looked like after firing due to the surface rust. I suppose I’ll have to clean the chamber…. grin
IMG_4134.jpeg



In pretest both the R700 pattern rifles malfunctioned immediately and multiple times in the first 20 rounds. The custom gun was a 300 win mag and had several fail to feed, and fail to eject IIRC. The Seekins PH3 6.5PRC had 4 I believe in the first 10 rounds- same issues.

The Seekins also got a bit of snow on it on for the first shot on the last day, and absolutely could not be chambered or fired. Cliff Grey dumped the tiny bit of snow off before shooting, and it still wouldn’t function. Fortunately I have a super power and got it on camera. grin

This is what stopped it cold (pic taken before shooting and before dumping that snow off)-
IMG_4104.jpeg

1771876984702.jpeg



After wards, it was demonstrated to the class, and still wouldn’t chamber/work with a tiny bit of snow in the open port. I took a Tikka 223 and dumped quite a bit in it, hammered it home and it fired. The case did not extract, and truck antenna was used to pop it out- however it came out without any resistance, and then it was found that the snow had been pressed into use holding the extractor open. A swipe with a knife tip and the rifle worked correctly. The same was done a bit later with no function issue at all.

To put it in perspective the difference between the Seekins PH3 and other platforms, a Tikka T3, Raven, Sako TRG, and Blaser R8 were left outside all day and night covered in snow- and functioned with zero issues the next day.

IMG_3944.jpeg

IMG_3947.jpeg
IMG_3950.jpeg


IMG_3952.jpeg


Raven right before recoil-
IMG_4146.jpeg

Full recoil-
IMG_4147.jpeg


No issues at all.




The differences were so obvious to all, that questions and discussions were relatively common about how people do not know that this is real, and why does the industry keep using sub par designs. Despite the internet just knowing it isn’t so, the problem, malfunction, and failure rate differences between rifles in just normal hunting use not on a flat range, is not the same. They’re not even on the same planet.

If we tried to conduct these classes with R700 pattern customs, we would spend 25-50% of the class time just trying to get and keep them functioning.


Cont….
 
Hard Gear:



Packs:


Packs used were Exo K4’s with the Teratorn bag. One Kifaru that I remember.

Most did not use the wings in the Teratorn the whole time due to the little gear being carried in them, which was interesting- but the bags worked well regardless.
Overall most seemed to learn that having to undue multiple straps, open the main bag up, undue buckles, etc to reach puff suits, tripods, spotters/binos, etc. is just silly and sucks as a user. The couple that used the wings on the bag showed a noticeable advantage in speed and ease of access to equipment.




Skis and snowshoes:

Were not used this class.



Rifles:

Mostly Tikka T3’s. 2x Remington based rifles/actions (1x Seekins PH3, 1x Defiance IIRC @WDO), 2x Tikka M595’s, 1x MRC Marshall, 1x Blaser R8 for a bit, and 3x UM/S2H Ravens. A smattering of others were used randomly for a little while.


All Tikkas in this class had factory trigger springs, all were taken apart and reassembled per our standard- there were no issues.


In pretest both the R700 pattern rifles malfunctioned immediately and multiple times in the first 20 rounds. The custom gun was a 300 win mag and had several fail to feed, and fail to eject IIRC. The Seekins PH3 6.5PRC had 4 I believe in the first 10 rounds- same issues.

The Seekins also got a bit of snow on it on for the first shot on the last day, and absolutely could not be chambered or fired. Cliff Grey dumped the tiny bit of snow off before shooting, and it still wouldn’t function. Fortunately I have a super power and got it on camera. grin

This is what stopped it cold (pic taken before shooting and before dumping that snow off)-
View attachment 1026628

View attachment 1026636



After wards, it was demonstrated to the class, and still wouldn’t chamber/work with a tiny bit of snow in the open port. I took a Tikka 223 and dumped quite a bit in it, hammered it home and it fired. The case did not extract, and truck antenna was used to pop it out- however it came out without any resistance, and then it was found that the snow had been pressed into use holding the extractor open. A swipe with a knife tip and the rifle worked correctly. The same was done a bit later with no function issue at all.

To put it in perspective the difference between the Seekins PH3 and other platforms, a Tikka T3, Raven, Sako TRG, and Blaser R8 were left outside all day and night covered in snow- and functioned with zero issues the next day.

View attachment 1026637

View attachment 1026638
View attachment 1026640


View attachment 1026641


Raven right before recoil-
View attachment 1026642

Full recoil-
View attachment 1026644


No issues at all.




The differences were so obvious to all, that questions and discussions were relatively common about how people do not know that this is real, and why does the industry keep using sub par designs. Despite the internet just knowing it isn’t so, the problem, malfunction, and failure rate differences between rifles in just normal hunting use not on a flat range, is not the same. They’re not even on the same planet.

If we tried to conduct these classes with R700 pattern customs, we would spend 25-50% of the class time just trying to get and keep them functioning.


Cont….


Really appreciate the level of detail on this, especially regarding getting the Tikka going in the snow. Do you recall what specifically the snow was affecting on the 700-pattern action to shut it down? As in, where/what parts were getting interfered with, and how?
 
Scopes/mounts:


Most used SWFA’s of various models. There were Maven RS1.2’s, a Trijicon Tenmile, a couple Minox ZP5’s, a S&B 3-12x Klassik, an NF NX8, and 3x ZT S2H scopes as well that I remember.


The only actual scope issue we had was a 3-15x gen 1 SWFA had the parralax turret completely separate. This scope has lived a very rough life with 10’ish classes on it as a rental, plus being thrown around on gear, and going through the drop eval- but still, it shouldn’t have happens. Scope seemed to stay zeroed, and the pin that controls PA was able to be moved to set focus for mid range, taped over and used for a while.

IMG_4115.jpeg


This scope is from 2024 IRRC, and all the issues I have seen- 2x side PA issues, 1x reticle rotating, and 1x internal fogging all come from the same batch/order. My guess is there is batch made that had some issues. For what it’s worth- none have lost zero.




The S2H scopes were used by most at the class- I will let them give their feedback and thoughts as one haven’t changed. The scopes all worked without issue, and the reticle worked from broad daylight to nighttime under headlights.




Spotting scopes/binos:

A good mix of 10-15x binos on tripods, and several different versions of spotters. Overall lesson and the biggest takeaways for most would be that handholding or resting 10x and even 15x binos does not work for spotting shots and animals, and the short eye relief of most spotters sucks. Missed calls, unseen shots, etc happen exponentially more spotting unless tripod mounted. Short eye relief that is the norm on almost all spotters is a complete joke- and no one uses their spotter after the first day or two. Only the Leupold Mark 4 spotter was used consistently.

Cliff also had the image stabilized spotter from Sig. it has some potential uses, but was behind 15x binos and the Leupold spotter in actual spotting.



Rangefinders:

All but two students used Bino LRF’s. Cliff Grey used separate for some or maybe all of the class, and one other- due he said to not knowing which to get.

Revic Bino LRF’s were most common, and had no issues ranging for the week.



TBC…
 
Back
Top