S2H Scope Interest

[Q_Sertorius]

If you’re gonna do it by seniority or post count instead of payment made, go ahead and count me out

This thread is a free-fire zone of memes and bad ideas. That suggestion was in no way official or serious.

 

[waspocrew]

Was that an actual thought or just bs.
?

No, just bs.

 

[Idhunter777]

With all the interest in the "Would you buy this scope" thread, thought I would help consolidate interest.

Specs as I understand it today for the S2H rifle scope:
S2H x Zero Tech collaboration; made by LOW
3-18x44 30mm tube
25 oz, 12.5" long
FFP
Simplified THLR reticle with illuminated center dot (button push)
Low turrets with 29 mils available, 10 mils per rotation, Zero stop on elevation
Capped windage
Initial offering price = $999


View attachment 1014446

With all the interest in the "Would you buy this scope" thread, thought I would help consolidate interest.

Specs as I understand it today for the S2H rifle scope:
S2H x Zero Tech collaboration; made by LOW
3-18x44 30mm tube
25 oz, 12.5" long
FFP
Simplified THLR reticle with illuminated center dot (button push)
Low turrets with 29 mils available, 10 mils per rotation, Zero stop on elevation
Capped windage
Initial offering price = $999


View attachment 1014446

I’ll let some other guys and gals beta test this before I get one down the road

 

[Wrench]

I'm still trying to understand what problem the thlr reticle solves. It parks a whole bunch of reticle in my preferred holdover and shot spotting area. I get that it's easy to see in the low power....but so is a whole schnagety of others.

 

[ckt3]

This thread is a free-fire zone of memes and bad ideas. That suggestion was in no way official or serious.

You forgot it is also a record of incontrovertible proof on the superiority of MOA over mils and the definitive resolution of this debate once and for all.

 

[nm.otter]

they know how to make a good scope and won’t apply that knowledge to the rest of their line.

They don't make anything.
They contract with ODMs who design and produce things to a specified set of standards at a quoted price -- and appear to have lucked out on the RS 1.2, which met standards they did not actually specify.

 

[Jake Larsen]

I'm still trying to understand what problem the thlr reticle solves. It parks a whole bunch of reticle in my preferred holdover and shot spotting area. I get that it's easy to see in the low power....but so is a whole schnagety of others.

Have you seen the discussion on this in the other thread? The last 20-30ish posts has some back and forth. Specifically post 3428 compiles a bunch of info on the THLR. Seems better to point you over there than re-hash the entire discussion here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk