S&B Klassik 3-12....reliable and good stuff?

Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
9,719
Last couple nights I had bucks come out right at end of legal shooting light and I could have used a little more brightness than my RS1.2 offered. Got me looking at the 3-12 polars with a similar reticle/turret setup to the klassik. Anyone compared the two?
 

atmat

WKR
Joined
Jun 10, 2022
Messages
3,202
Location
Colorado
Last couple nights I had bucks come out right at end of legal shooting light and I could have used a little more brightness than my RS1.2 offered. Got me looking at the 3-12 polars with a similar reticle/turret setup to the klassik. Anyone compared the two?
I haven’t tried the Polar, but have you tried the Klassic? It was brighter to my eyes than the RS1.2 is.
 

KenLee

WKR
Joined
Jun 9, 2021
Messages
2,518
Location
South Carolina
Last couple nights I had bucks come out right at end of legal shooting light and I could have used a little more brightness than my RS1.2 offered. Got me looking at the 3-12 polars with a similar reticle/turret setup to the klassik. Anyone compared the two?
Klassic is better than the Maven to my eyes.
Polar is better than the Klassic to me.
Large objective Polar is the low light king unless you find a Leica Magnus illuminated center dot which hasn't been available in the US in over 2 years. Flip a coin on those 2 for low light hunting, but I preferred the illumination adjustments on the Magnus.
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2018
Messages
337
Location
Northern NY
Last couple nights I had bucks come out right at end of legal shooting light and I could have used a little more brightness than my RS1.2 offered. Got me looking at the 3-12 polars with a similar reticle/turret setup to the klassik. Anyone compared the two?
I haven’t tried a polar or the Maven so I can’t be of much help there. I will say for what ever reason the glass on my Klassik has been by far my favorite. I have been using Swfa scopes for the past few seasons along with a 4-14 shv and a 4-16 Atacr, prior to that were various leupolds, nxs, and 3-10 shv. The Klassik to me has the best picture especially in low light. I really like the 3-12 and it’s “short comings” really aren’t much of a factor for my hunting, ie the 4.8mil turret and 1 mil graduations. I really like how bold the outer posts are on the Klassik compared to other scopes it really is much faster to acquire on low power in lower light. I found myself going to higher power on other ffp scopes to see the reticle which further hurt the low light visibility.
 

amassi

WKR
Joined
May 26, 2018
Messages
3,938
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Messages
1,716
The Polar is brighter than the Klassik. Been thinking on a 2.5-10 Polar with the L7 or L4 reticle for a point and shoot dark woods deer rifle but didn't pull the trigger on the sale.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
896
Location
Lyon County, NV
I've spent too much time drooling over this Polar. https://www.eurooptic.com/Schmidt-B...L-1cm-cw-ASV-H-BDC-H-Riflescope-756-911-.aspx

However, I decided a second RS1.2 and a Scythe-Ti was the better value for me. I still want one.

The 42 mm Klassik was very impressive in the dark. I imagine the Polar would be even more so.

Do you know what the story is on the S&B sale? That link you provided is now marked "discontinued"...are they going to stop carrying S&B, or something...as in some kind of close-out sale? Those are some pretty steep discounts on other S&B scopes they're still offering sale price on.
 

Marbles

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
May 16, 2020
Messages
4,471
Location
AK
Do you know what the story is on the S&B sale? That link you provided is now marked "discontinued"...are they going to stop carrying S&B, or something...as in some kind of close-out sale? Those are some pretty steep discounts on other S&B scopes they're still offering sale price on.
I don't know, it was available for back order just a few weeks ago. Now I really whish I had just gotten one.
 
Top