- Banned
- #5,681
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You made the correct decision to order the sporter inlet. The only adaptation needed has to do with the length and taper where the breech sits in the channel. That can be fixed in 3 minutes with a wrench socket wrapped in 120 grit sandpaper.It has a featherweight barrel, I ordered a RokStok with a factory sported barrel channel.
The BM5/Ace3 contours are too beefy (too much inlet space in relation to barrel diameter), a Sendero inlet is way too beefy.
NoneWhat negative effects have you seen with larger barrel spacing?
What negative effects have you seen with larger barrel spacing?
We know what they look like. We're interested in what you perceive as downsides, other than aesthetics.I'm supposing that RDT415 cares whether his new stock will fit his barreled action. You appear to suppose that he should care less.
The negative effect, and potential consequence you don't have to pay for, is that you're offering bad advice.
RDT415 noted he has a steel featherlight barrel, which is approx Douglas 2 sporter and grossly disproportionate to a Sendero channel. Just visualize a steel barrel contour that tapers .75" to .55" sitting in a 1.20" barrel channel. Gaps are OK till they are not.
RDT415: Tonight I'll PM a photo of a #3 in a Sendero channel.
What are the negatives of the stock actually fitting without having gigantic spacings between the barrel and stock? Honest question.There are negative effects in a carbon fiber stock to the barrel channel being “perfect.”
There are zero negatives in a barrel channel being too big.
Where else are we going to put all these dead cats?What are the negatives of the stock actually fitting without having gigantic spacings between the barrel and stock? Honest question.
That's a smart approach. Thanks for responding.II am certainly after function and would not mind a larger gap in the barrel channel of the stock so long as its not a "hot dog in a hallway" which sounds like my featherweight in the Sendero profile would be and slightly less with the #3. I've got about 300 rounds or so through the OEM featherweight and being a 308 I imagine I have plenty of life left in the barrel, but would rebarrel with a larger contour in the future. The featherweight heats up quick at the range.
I am guessing I can open up / sand the barrel channel in the future if I wanted to rebarrel with a slightly larger contour/profile or if planning to go with a larger barrel see if I can request a change to the #3 channel. Either way both channels will fit what I got at the moment. Thank you all for the replies/advice It is greatly appreciated.
Couple things.What are the negatives of the stock actually fitting without having gigantic spacings between the barrel and stock? Honest question.
In my opinion there are negatives to having too much space in the barrel channel (besides looking like shit). Depending on the type of hunting that a person does, you can get dirt, sticks, leaves and all kinds of crap inside the barrel channel. I have a Rokstok on order, and I would hope that it would actually fit my barrel and action. Seems like a lot of folks on here don't care about looks and fit on these stocks. I'm not one of them.
Well one is it's harder to get shit out. If the fits like a hotdog in a hallway, inspection and removal of debris and is easy without disassembly. Whereas "perfect" means it's both difficult to check and likely requires disassembly as its tight enough to get stuff wedged in. Probably less of an issue with a plastic stock that's hollow but in a composite stock the debris can't fall down away from the barrel. Also if you like aesthetics why the rokstok it's fugly (OK maybe less so now I've looked at a tonne of photos). Dont have to go full sendero but going 3b seems appropriate.What are the negatives of the stock actually fitting without having gigantic spacings between the barrel and stock? Honest question.
In my opinion there are negatives to having too much space in the barrel channel (besides looking like shit). Depending on the type of hunting that a person does, you can get dirt, sticks, leaves and all kinds of crap inside the barrel channel. I have a Rokstok on order, and I would hope that it would actually fit my barrel and action. Seems like a lot of folks on here don't care about looks and fit on these stocks. I'm not one of them.
There's obviously some different opinions and points of view on this subject. I don't have to have the prettiest gun on the mountain, but I just can't get into the "dead cat" mentality. And by the way, I actually think the Rokstok looks pretty cool. Especially with some of the cerakote jobs that I've seen on them.Well one is it's harder to get shit out. If the fits like a hotdog in a hallway, inspection and removal of debris and is easy without disassembly. Whereas "perfect" means it's both difficult to check and likely requires disassembly as its tight enough to get stuff wedged in. Probably less of an issue with a plastic stock that's hollow but in a composite stock the debris can't fall down away from the barrel. Also if you like aesthetics why the rokstok it's fugly (OK maybe less so now I've looked at a tonne of photos). Dont have to go full sendero but going 3b seems appropriate.
Busting alders with a tight barrel channel on a Kimber Montana I had leaves and contact between the stock and barrel that I found when the hunt was over and I pulled the action from the stock (so much dirt and debris I actually ran it under a faucet).Depending on the type of hunting that a person does, you can get dirt, sticks, leaves and all kinds of crap inside the barrel channel. I have a Rokstok on order, and I would hope that it would actually fit my barrel and action. Seems like a lot of folks on here don't care about looks and fit on these stocks. I'm not one of them.