RokStok

I think the rokstok is gorgeous.
Is it just the fact that it ain't normal?
If it works I'm all over it.
If it works well for most people, the look will grow on everyone who doesn’t like it aesthetically (besides those that think anything but a traditional sporter stock is unacceptable)

A few years ago I bought the ugliest compound there was, now I actually like the looks of those bows… owning, shooting and appreciate the design, it filled its niche better than anything in its class, totally changed the perceived look for me

Certain classic lines and designs just look good, even if they don’t work well, but beyond that, I think function changes style.

I don’t mind how it looks at all, but I also appreciate all of the thought that went into it, and I assume that’s why. If I had not read anything about the rokstok and just saw a picture without explanation, I certainly wouldn’t think it was a pretty stock, or eye pleasing lines, but I think that’s the point… make it work as good as possible and it will look like whatever it looks like, that’s what’s cool about this project they took on.

I wish everything was designed with that mindset
 
If it works well for most people, the look will grow on everyone who doesn’t like it aesthetically (besides those that think anything but a traditional sporter stock is unacceptable)

A few years ago I bought the ugliest compound there was, now I actually like the looks of those bows… owning, shooting and appreciate the design, it filled its niche better than anything in its class, totally changed the perceived look for me

Certain classic lines and designs just look good, even if they don’t work well, but beyond that, I think function changes style.

I don’t mind how it looks at all, but I also appreciate all of the thought that went into it, and I assume that’s why. If I had not read anything about the rokstok and just saw a picture without explanation, I certainly wouldn’t think it was a pretty stock, or eye pleasing lines, but I think that’s the point… make it work as good as possible and it will look like whatever it looks like, that’s what’s cool about this project they took on.

I wish everything was designed with that mindset
For sure.
I think I've just been watching to closely.lol.
I can see the function without even touching it
 
If it works well for most people, the look will grow on everyone who doesn’t like it aesthetically (besides those that think anything but a traditional sporter stock is unacceptable)

A few years ago I bought the ugliest compound there was, now I actually like the looks of those bows… owning, shooting and appreciate the design, it filled its niche better than anything in its class, totally changed the perceived look for me

Certain classic lines and designs just look good, even if they don’t work well, but beyond that, I think function changes style.

I don’t mind how it looks at all, but I also appreciate all of the thought that went into it, and I assume that’s why. If I had not read anything about the rokstok and just saw a picture without explanation, I certainly wouldn’t think it was a pretty stock, or eye pleasing lines, but I think that’s the point… make it work as good as possible and it will look like whatever it looks like, that’s what’s cool about this project they took on.

I wish everything was designed with that mindset
Not to long ago I thought vertical grips were ugly. Most of it is just what people are use to.

Though, nothing synthetic is pretty, I've just come to accept that ugly guns are the most useful in the environments I use them in.
 
Some pics to me it looks awful and some it looks pretty good; I think it’s just a matter of what finish it has and the angles of the picture. I’m sure it’s plenty functional
 
Some pics to me it looks awful and some it looks pretty good; I think it’s just a matter of what finish it has and the angles of the picture. I’m sure it’s plenty functional

I think that banded paint job is pretty awful.

@Unknown Munitions, the next time I have you paint a stock, please keep @Formidilosus away from the paint room. 😀
 
If it works well for most people, the look will grow on everyone who doesn’t like it aesthetically (besides those that think anything but a traditional sporter stock is unacceptable)

A few years ago I bought the ugliest compound there was, now I actually like the looks of those bows… owning, shooting and appreciate the design, it filled its niche better than anything in its class, totally changed the perceived look for me

Certain classic lines and designs just look good, even if they don’t work well, but beyond that, I think function changes style.

I don’t mind how it looks at all, but I also appreciate all of the thought that went into it, and I assume that’s why. If I had not read anything about the rokstok and just saw a picture without explanation, I certainly wouldn’t think it was a pretty stock, or eye pleasing lines, but I think that’s the point… make it work as good as possible and it will look like whatever it looks like, that’s what’s cool about this project they took on.

I wish everything was designed with that mindset
Yep, in this case ...

Function follows FORM.
 
Back
Top