Rokstok Lite

I am not saying that smaller stature people cannot make do with a longer LOP. I am 5'8" and usually can shoot factory stocks just fine.
  • Except for the need for a glue on cheek riser, the plain Jane Tikka Lite stock fits me perfectly.
  • My Browning X Bolt's stock has a LOP about 1/2" longer than I really like.
With plastic spacers making it easy to give everyone a custom LOP, it is smarter to start with a base on short end of LOP rather than go with a longer version.

Why make someone shoot a stock that is too long for them or make them go through the cost of having the stock shortened (most people won't try it DIY imo) when everyone can get a LOP they like with spacers?
I would agree with this if they weren't already making a youth rokstock light. Just call the youth models the "Short" at like 12" and add spacers up to 13.5" and then make a "long" at 14+". It just doesn't make a lot of sense to have two models that are both too short for the average hunter (likely around 5'10"). But, I am just thankful to form, ryan, and UM for making this happen at all.
 
Thoughts on the McMillan Mountain Tracker Long Range stock compared to the RS lite?
I believe @khuber84 is one of the handful that owns both the MTLR and original RS.. Perhaps he can provide some thoughts/speculation on the MTRS and RS Lite comparison based on his experience with the original RS and planned changes for the RS Lite?
 
I believe @khuber84 is one of the handful that owns both the MTLR and original RS.. Perhaps he can provide some thoughts/speculation on the MTRS and RS Lite comparison based on his experience with the original RS and planned changes for the RS Lite?
I don't have a rokstok lite to compare any my rokstoks or Mtn tracker lr to. I'm not a fan of short forends, no non flush arca. So the rokstok loses points in some places but has really good handling characteristics, gets a few back. If I was going with a 16in barrel and OTB can, I could see the merit of the short forend. However since the airlock does all that the OTB and reaper do in a can with less form factor and lighter, I see no point in OTB cans.
 
I don't have a rokstok lite to compare any my rokstoks or Mtn tracker lr to. I'm not a fan of short forends, no non flush arca. So the rokstok loses points in some places but has really good handling characteristics, gets a few back. If I was going with a 16in barrel and OTB can, I could see the merit of the short forend. However since the airlock does all that the OTB and reaper do in a can with less form factor and lighter, I see no point in OTB cans.
Maybe just tone. But I'd like to hear some reports from someone comparing the airlocks to the OG otb cans. Perhaps similar tone can be had by the inner geometry.
 
Maybe just tone. But I'd like to hear some reports from someone comparing the airlocks to the OG otb cans. Perhaps similar tone can be had by the inner geometry.
I'm in the camp that this "Tone" is just a human preference or flavor. Does it do anything downrange, does a game animal thats 400y downrange have any perception of this "tone" affect? I don't think it makes a measurable difference.

I know I was standing 100y laterally to 5 different cans that were all quality hunting supressors from 5" to 7" and lightweight. I couldn't really tell the difference in any but the ultra5, it was a definite standout as the loudest.
 
I'm in the camp that this "Tone" is just a human preference or flavor. Does it do anything downrange, does a game animal thats 400y downrange have any perception of this "tone" affect? I don't think it makes a measurable difference.

I know I was standing 100y laterally to 5 different cans that were all quality hunting supressors from 5" to 7" and lightweight. I couldn't really tell the difference in any but the ultra5, it was a definite standout as the loudest.
It may not make any difference. I certainly don't have the experience to say. It could be human preference. I'm only concerned with it being light, short, and quiet enough to not cause damage with an unprotected shot every once in awhile
 
It may not make any difference. I certainly don't have the experience to say. It could be human preference. I'm only concerned with it being light, short, and quiet enough to not cause damage with an unprotected shot every once in awhile
Agreed: light, hearing safe, minimal form factor. My supressor priorities for hunting.
 
I believe @khuber84 is one of the handful that owns both the MTLR and original RS.. Perhaps he can provide some thoughts/speculation on the MTRS and RS Lite comparison based on his experience with the original RS and planned changes for the RS Lite?
I have a MTLR and just ordered a Rokstock…I plan on posting photos comparing the two when I receive the RS…really haven’t seen any close ups comparing the two(one on top of the other)…
 
I have a MTLR and just ordered a Rokstock…I plan on posting photos comparing the two when I receive the RS…really haven’t seen any close ups comparing the two(one on top of the other)…

1767157173547.jpeg


1767157206645.jpeg



18” 308 win, T3 lite suppressed. Aimpoint is center of the head for all shots, and the pictures are the max reticle movement during recoil for 2x shots each. Mountain Tracker Long range, Rokstok, KRG Echo in order.


Mountain Tracker long Range. Every effort made to control muzzle rise as much as possible-
1767157469239.jpeg

1767157574799.jpeg



ROKStok nearly free recoil. No effort made at all to fight muzzle rise beyond light contact with shoulder-
1767157643328.jpeg


ROKStok, but with my standard hold- firm and solid, no other effort made-
1767157682432.jpeg



KRG Echo- Every effort made to control muzzle rise as much as possible-
1767157806504.jpeg

1767157817270.jpeg
 
Back
Top