thinhorn_AK
"DADDY"
I’m personally switching over to scopes that can take some abuse and mounting setups that can do the same. I few more onces is worth it.
Thats what I’m saying. Have you had a bad experience that has made you decide that?I’m personally switching over to scopes that can take some abuse and mounting setups that can do the same. I few more onces is worth it.
Now that right there is funny.I’m waiting for the new Harbor Freight scope to be released. It’s supposed to have some really nice features.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have not had an issue and I’ve used leupolds for a very long time but the reports are getting too numerous to ignore. It would be brutal to be on a trip and have a scope go down or a talley ultralight ring crack.Thats what I’m saying. Have you had a bad experience that has made you decide that?
Have you compared glass clarity to any of the optics in this list or any in general and if so how did it compare?+1 for Meopta Optika6. Love the rubber grip turrets, especially on wet days and amount of dial up. I don't have the $$$ (or balls) to test drop my rifle scopes but this fall off the back of a truck and kept zero and dial ups.
I was thinking the Nightforce atacr 4-20
A side-by-side comparison to the Athlon Midas for my eyes, Meopta was clearer and brighter. Meopta was better then Vortex HD, Burris and NF nxs early and late. I am believer that different folks eyes like different glass, my hunting partner liked NF over Meopta but agree its better than Vortex and Burris. Meopta makes Zeiss Conquest scopes but I believe they use a lower class glass for the Conquest. (not positive)Have you compared glass clarity to any of the optics in this list or any in general and if so how did it compare?
I personally have had bad experiences to include wandering zero, complete loss of zero, poor tracking, and failure to return to zero. This has happened with multiple high end scopes from different manufacturers with great glass but the scopes failed. I've missed several animals due to complete scope failures (some were safe queens that were shot a fair amount at the range but didn't see hard use). That's when I dove head first into reliability and now I only buy scopes with a proven tract record. Any scope CAN fail, but some are way more likely to fail than others.Have you had a bad experience that has made you decide that?
So what do you rely on now that you have had these experiences!?I personally have had bad experiences to include wandering zero, complete loss of zero, poor tracking, and failure to return to zero. This has happened with multiple high end scopes from different manufacturers with great glass but the scopes failed. I've missed several animals due to complete scope failures (some were safe queens that were shot a fair amount at the range but didn't see hard use). That's when I dove head first into reliability and now I only buy scopes with a proven tract record. Any scope CAN fail, but some are way more likely to fail than others.
So what do you rely on now that you have had these experiences!?
Of course you're right , but I still get to participate in the conversations and I'm entitled to my opinions . What works for me might not work for you , but that doesn't mean it's wrong .Respectfully, your hunting is very, very dissimilar to what most on this forum, myself included, do, and what the op is talking about.
Also, hunting is life and death for the animals we are pursuing.