So for all you rattlesnake experts out there, maybe you can clear something up for me. It seems like I've heard conflicting information about just how bad rattlesnake bites are for humans. In the past, I thought everyone sounded like it was a death sentence. Now, it seems like more people seem to be saying that the bite isn't that bad and very few are actually fatal. Which is it? I understand that a lot of it depends on whether or not you actually get venom and how much, but is that all it is? If you really get popped by one with an average amount of venom are the odds against you?
Definitely not a death sentence.
1. Your general health and underlying conditions have more to do with outcomes than level of envenomation.
2. Dry bite, vs envenomated strike.
3. How long has it been since the bite, and has tissue started to necrose or die. If dead tissue is present, removing it becomes the priority before it can become infected.
4. Infection is the major risk after the venom does its damage. Both from the puncture, but also tissue necrosis.
Snake bites were meant to kill small animals, not 100-200lb humans. But an infected necrotic wound will kill you pronto. The purpose of the anti venom is to limit the amount of localized tissue death that will occur, hopefully preventing a gangrenous infection from setting in.
Also, the swelling/hemolyzed blood all by itself can create a compartment syndrome that will choke off the capillaries and strangulate whatever structure is being affected. Limiting or preventing this response is another reason for the anti venom.
I’ve been bit, dry strike thankfully. And all I needed was a tetanus booster.
I’ve also treated people who waited days to come into the hospital, and they have lost limbs because of it.