Q&A for Minox ZP5 5-25x56mm THLR scope

[THLR]

Your viewer comments are AWESOME.

Yes, the people taking the time are plain nice and sometimes quite funny. It's roughly 2500 ok guys for every 1 hater that drops a comment.

 

[Dobermann]

Yes, the people taking the time are plain nice and sometimes quite funny. It's roughly 2500 ok guys for every 1 hater that drops a comment.

Thomas - to me it points to just how much so many of us have learned from you over so many years.

I have a vague memory that in your interview with Kerry, you might have expressed some small doubt about what impact your work had ... please know that many of us are better shooters because of the thousands of hours you've put into this - your work is not for nothing, and we appreciate it immensely.

 

[BAKPAKR]

The "but" is for Minox, a 2-in-1 reticle instead of two seperate product lines. Not my decision to make.

Revic is a clean hunting reticle, it's very nice. I'm a 100% mrad guy, the only difficulty I have with an MOA scope is putting a MOA value on my windcall. Other than than that, MOA//MRAD involves the same decisions for the shooter and both will work equally well. I cannot compare with my Minox, but I've never found the scopes lacking in image quality the 4-5 days I've used them.

In the film below I use the Revic with a MOA reticle; I just trusted the windcall from @Aaron Davidson and the bullet struck the pronghorn less than 2" from my intended point of impact. It would have been slower had I been alone as my MIL windcall would have to be converted to MOA and the only reason for "slower" is me being metric.

You talk funny.