Project 2025 and public lands and environment

[Skerhunter]

I don’t trust how they are going about it because of in part who is doing it. Also, I disagree with how they are going about it. It’s not efficient or well thought out an it’s cut first figure it out later. There is no representation of our interest it’s one man’s opinion on waste. One he has demonstrated to be, so far, self serving. A man who isn’t likely to see waste the same way I do.

If Aldo Leupold were up there taking an ax to things or something like that then I could rest a bit more at ease that his priorities align better. But in the end that wouldn’t work out for others. There is a reason why the constitution puts those powers not in the executive but the legislative branch.

These are basically all assumptions? Have you seen Any specific cuts that will affect conservation/public lands? I haven’t seen any yet - most funding cuts have been for ridiculous made up programs or expenses?

 

[Skerhunter]

The system you speak about was a Democracy set up by the US Constitution. We lived by the laws enacted by Congress, you know WE THE PEOPLE. Now we have an autocracy based on conspiracy theories and mis-information that is controlled by an oligarchy. Everyone knew what was coming because of what transpired during the first term. The coup failed yet here we are with the same monkeys on our backs. I will feel fortunate if there is a hunting season this fall and we are still getting our SS and Medicare….benefits that we have already paid for!

You talk about conspiracy theorist being the issue then state that trump is going to prevent you from hunting this fall

 

[PLhunter]

These are basically all assumptions? Have you seen Any specific cuts that will affect conservation/public lands? I haven’t seen any yet - most funding cuts have been for ridiculous made up programs or expenses?

I am more in line with the millions getting laid off than I am with the man with the ax. I see the harm, I’m yet to see the benefit.

No they haven’t been though. That’s the thing. Axing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau which cost us little and paid back a lot. That’s not a ridiculous program or expense. The work of those DOI employees wasn’t either.

Additionally, I have never seen the man speak well of the environment, hunting, or public lands. So I’m assuming based on an educated assumption that he’s going to view those things as waste.

 

[PLhunter]

You talk about conspiracy theorist being the issue then state that trump is going to prevent you from hunting this fall

You’re going from solid arguments to textbook gaslighting.

 

[Skerhunter]

You’re going from solid arguments to textbook gaslighting.

How is that gaslighting? Did you read his post - he’s worried we won’t have a hunting season and lose social security/medicare. Seems like a very irrational concern doesn’t it?

 

[Gila]

These are basically all assumptions? Have you seen Any specific cuts that will affect conservation/public lands? I haven’t seen any yet - most funding cuts have been for ridiculous made up programs or expenses?

We don’t know how the GAOA is going to be funded if at all. We don’t know how the excise taxes collected by the Pittman - Robertson Act will be distributed. Nor do we know what is going to happen to the Dingell act. All I have seen is the demonizing of the Conservation and Environmental groups. Here is Zeldin’s take: Zeldin said it is time for the EPA to return to its core mission of conservation — which he argued is a core conservative principle — and ditch the leftist environmentalist radicalism that has dominated in the past.
——————————————————————————-
Keep an eye on the spending bill…..

 

[Skerhunter]

We don’t know how the GAOA is going to be funded if at all. We don’t know how the excise taxes collected by the Pittman - Robertson Act will be distributed. Nor do we know what is going to happen to the Dingell act. All I have seen is the demonizing of the Conservation and Environmental groups. Here is Zeldin’s take: Zeldin said it is time for the EPA to return to its core mission of conservation — which he argued is a core conservative principle — and ditch the leftist environmentalist radicalism that has dominated in the past.
——————————————————————————-
Keep an eye on the spending bill…..

Have any actual changes been made? Why do you automatically assume all of these programs will be cut/destroyed?

 

[littlebigtine]

sometimes I wonder if humans ever know how good they got it until it all falls apart.

 

[TaperPin]

I am thrilled with the job being done. 9/10 rating. Not perfect but great. I made it clear one page 1 what the problem was. Precision cuts and stuff people are moaning in this thread was on the table in this presidents first term. the response from people like you and the other TDS'ers here was to cheer on using lawfare trying to put him jail and to start dumping money down endless holes, open borders, etc etc. So here we are. Making cuts that 6/10 americans are lovin. People know the kids needed the credit card taken away. I am sorry some people are losing their jobs. i said it already. I have been through this process and it sucks. But as we have seen time and time again in this thread. You and others refuse to even acknowledge there was glaring fat to be trimmed. So this is the way it had to happen. Sorry. Thats what happens when we have had years and years of mismanagement capped by the last 4 years of absolute disaster. How anything in this thread has remotely help people related to conservation, I have no clue.

Drama in the government is just a distraction from the real things we should be worried about.

He has about 200 more weeks to go. Every week I look around to see if the lives of our kids or ourselves are any better. So far no real change. Prices haven’t gone down and it looks like inflation will be going up, but I say we just wait and see.

We were going to upgrade a vehicle, but with all the drama and uncertainty we’re going to wait, so it has negatively affected us in that way.

Two kids in the family were hoping to sell this summer and upgrade houses, but higher interest rates and higher housing prices make that harder and more expensive if it happens at all.

We just did our taxes, so this time next year we’ll see if taxes come down - tarrifs are taxes, so already in a few short weeks our taxes are already up so it’s not a great start. His plans are to cut taxes of billionaires so that ticks me off.

I love eggs and would like the price to come down - today some wing nut in the administration tried to put the used car spin on how they want to look at wild ducks and geese and not kill chickens, but who’s pulling our leg - the only defense we have is isolating infected flocks and starting from scratch.

The used car guy sold you a car and he wants you to believe the “KarmaFox” report he put together himself. Let’s see how it holds up the next 200 weeks.

 

[Coldtrail]

My understanding is the goal was to cut X number of federal employees. They offered the buyout to get the ball rolling. I’m not 100% on the exact details of how it works, but new hires/promoted employees have a probation period where they can get axed for no real reason (vs ppl in a position long term). Those layoffs probably affected a wide array of people who were simply in the wrong position at the wrong time.

Just like most layoffs they aren’t focused on the people just the numbers. Not sure what the next phase will be, but I’m sure there will be more layoffs ahead to achieve their goal (right or wrong).

Probationary termination is a lazy method to use because it sends a message to taxpayers implying that the ones at the bottom are of the least value, "waste" as is evidenced by comments made by some on this very site. In musk's method this dials focus away from the ones at the top of the pyramid who are leaps and bounds ahead of the average federal employees when it comes to wasting taxes and implementing the very programs that are being posted, the money is now gone for some programs but the person who pushed the program is still employed and in some cases reelected. You are correct that the intent of the probationary public employee system allows a probationary employee to be terminated for minimal reason, usually performance based, but other than the smoke and mirrors interpretation we will see at a later date the govt waste is still going to be there at the top along with those who pushed it and will now have more money to do as the only executive branch sees fit. If anyone is paying attention you see public lands budgets and positions have been cut over and over in the past 20yrs or so and are now being cut more. I think we can argue the finer details, but I still say we should be paying close attention at this point to every penny and every position being chiseled away instead of labelling every decision as waste and just trust the system as some are implying.

 

[Gila]

Have any actual changes been made? Why do you automatically assume all of these programs will be cut/destroyed?

Like I said the spending bill to fund the federal government will determine what happens to these laws and programs. I suggest asking your rep what is going on if they even know. There is mass confusion right now….for good reason.

 

[CJ19]

Drama in the government is just a distraction from the real things we should be worried about.

He has about 200 more weeks to go. Every week I look around to see if the lives of our kids or ourselves are any better. So far no real change. Prices haven’t gone down and it looks like inflation will be going up, but I say we just wait and see.

We were going to upgrade a vehicle, but with all the drama and uncertainty we’re going to wait, so it has negatively affected us in that way.

Two kids in the family were hoping to sell this summer and upgrade houses, but higher interest rates and higher housing prices make that harder and more expensive if it happens at all.

We just did our taxes, so this time next year we’ll see if taxes come down - tarrifs are taxes, so already in a few short weeks our taxes are already up so it’s not a great start. His plans are to cut taxes of billionaires so that ticks me off.

I love eggs and would like the price to come down - today some wing nut in the administration tried to put the used car spin on how they want to look at wild ducks and geese and not kill chickens, but who’s pulling our leg - the only defense we have is isolating infected flocks and starting from scratch.

The used car guy sold you a car and he wants you to believe the “KarmaFox” report he put together himself. Let’s see how it holds up the next 200 weeks.

Dear Diary

 

[Skerhunter]

Like I said the spending bill to fund the federal government will determine what happens to these laws and programs. I suggest asking your rep what is going on if they even know. There is mass confusion right now….for good reason.

Confusion for sure! Time will tell if there is an actual issue to be concern about or not. Could be business as usually for all these programs?

 

[JohnJohnson]

We need a billionaire who doesn't need the money to fix that level of corruption

I'm going to go out on a limb and say you wouldn't be psyched to see Bill Gates, Mark Cuban, or George Soros do this. But as you said it's a good thing billionaires famously don't care about making more money. Which is definitely a character trait billionaires have.

 

[Gila]

Trump came out with an executive order to change the funding provisions for the GAOA because he didn’t get what he wanted from Congress (during his first term). Biden then rescinded that executive order by executive order. Was Biden’s executive order rescinded by a new Executive Order…don’t know! And there are MAGA Republicans that have already tried to kill off Pitman - Robertson. There are real issues out there right now.

 

[PLhunter]

Have any actual changes been made? Why do you automatically assume all of these programs will be cut/destroyed?

The histories and personalities of the persons involved and put into positions by this government. The project 2025 agenda doesn’t scream conservation funding… The people who wrote that and want it executed are in position to make it happen. So I’m going to assume so until I see otherwise. I trust them to carry out their agenda.

 

[ScreamingPotato]

The system you speak about was a Democracy set up by the US Constitution. We lived by the laws enacted by Congress, you know WE THE PEOPLE. Now we have an autocracy based on conspiracy theories and mis-information that is controlled by an oligarchy. Everyone knew what was coming because of what transpired during the first term. The coup failed yet here we are with the same monkeys on our backs. I will feel fortunate if there is a hunting season this fall and we are still getting our SS and Medicare….benefits that we have already paid for!

So trust the corrupt politicians that put us in this hole, seems like a great idea.

Do you know the definition of the word coup or are you intentionally trying to discredit anything you post? It's certainly not people dancing around in costumes. Clearly you've been brainwashed by the crazies.

Edit: If you don't get your Medicare it'll be because the corrupt politicians spent all the money and we can't afford it. They've been robbing Medicare and social security for decades.

 

[ScreamingPotato]

I'm going to go out on a limb and say you wouldn't be psyched to see Bill Gates, Mark Cuban, or George Soros do this. But as you said it's a good thing billionaires famously don't care about making more money. Which is definitely a character trait billionaires have.

Gotta strong limb you're on and you're right. I wouldn't be opposed to Cuban advising even though he hates Trump but he does strike me as a dude who's not as corrupt as the other two. My point which you intentionally skipped over is that we clearly can't trust people who're abusing the system for their own profit to fix the system.

 

[PLhunter]

I'm going to go out on a limb and say you wouldn't be psyched to see Bill Gates, Mark Cuban, or George Soros do this. But as you said it's a good thing billionaires famously don't care about making more money. Which is definitely a character trait billionaires have.

The logic flaw of rich people with lots of money not wanting more money goes against the entire history of rich people.

 

[Coldtrail]

I'm going to go out on a limb and say you wouldn't be psyched to see Bill Gates, Mark Cuban, or George Soros do this. But as you said it's a good thing billionaires famously don't care about making more money. Which is definitely a character trait billionaires have.

Add to that a billionaire who was not elected by the people, and is not an employee of the govt so has zero accountability for decisions made.

Regardless of anyone's political leanings I think it's safe to admit this process sets a bad precedent, the "special govt employee" that under one president can cut money and positions with no checks and balances can also four years later put them right back and create new ones and answer to nobody but the commander and chief......just because he may have been picked by your guy it's okay to question some of this.