Posession limit ?

Really murky subject. First as mentioned the Feds establish the Federal Framework upon which the States set their annual seasons. I personally have hunted in VA, gone to Maryland that afternoon, and met a Md. Warden. Luckily I had my birds tagged (an index card that I wrote where/when I shot the ducks that morning) which put him at ease that I had my chit together (I only did that b/c I was heading to Md. that day. I never do that staying in state). He reminded me that I was done for the day to which I told him it was time for a good dinner and a drink. We then hunted away the next day and never worried a bit about possession limit b/c we ate the ducks I brought that night.

I know several folks who keep logs at their clubs/house and make certain you always label each bag in your freezer of what it is (even drake/hen counts) so they know. But the key is if you keep your nose clean a warden should never need to be in your home snooping around.
___________________________________________________________________
Now for a crazy story that's been online for years out of Texas. It's been posted on a site called the refuge forums and it shows how crazy things can get quickly when it comes to possession as well as other things. The pertinence of this story comes into the search portion of the story. The owl is just funny (not for the author).
Story here cut and pasted from that site:

First off, I would like to thank Chris Carlson, of Christopher L. Carlson & Associates, P.C for representing me and providing me the advice to guide me through this ordeal, his perspective as a hunter and criminal defense attorney was invaluable.

This story started after another non-eventful weekend of duck hunting with good friends.

After taking my afternoon siesta from the hustle and bustle of consulting life, I awakened to a VM on my cell phone. The message went something like this (I am still working on getting the original .wav file from Cingular); "This is Steve Hamilton Special Agent with the US Fish and Wildlife, we are sitting outside in your driveway, you need to come outside and talk to us, we are not leaving until you do."

I am thinking this is a prank, and then a light bulb goes off, I know that name. The reason the name sounds familiar is that three people that I know have been stopped by this special agent, and neither individual has positive reports. All three hunters stated this guy seemed to get off on hassling hunters; neither group received a ticket of any sort.

Back to reality, I look out my master bedroom window and there is a forest green Dodge Durango with antennas worthy of a storm chaser. Sure enough, there stood 2 LL Bean looking IRS agents in front of my truck and duck boat, I could only be so lucky. I go down to the inquisition and let the games begin.

I basically relay the story of what happened. It goes something like this. While driving to Lake Aggiemoose, I see something swoop in front of me, but no thought as there were no issues with the truck at the time. When we arrive at convenience store Aggiemoose, I see the owl embedded in my Ranch Hand, could not believe the sight, and take a picture. We launch at Lake Aggiemoose, have a spoony fest, take a picture of the owl on the boat, still in awe of the physical characteristics of the predator, then throw the owl into the grass. After hearing my story the Special Agent basically said he believed my story, remnants (fluid, blood, brain matter) of the owl were still on the ranch hand in a visible state.

The Special Agent then asked to search my freezer, I asked if he had a warrant, he said no. I then asked why, his response "I believe you still have the owl". My response "Why would I have the owl", no answer. I then asked "What if I just say no to a search, this conversation is over and I tell you to leave?" This is when the Special Agent got angry, which elicited the response "I will push for the maximum fine of $15,000, 1 year in jail and revocation of your hunting license." Special Agent Hamilton basically said that if the owl is not in the freezer this is over.

I debate the issue as I have a real problem with granting access to any LEO w/o a warrant, and no probable cause. I then consent to a search of my freezer only. It is obvious that no owl is in my freezer, but the Special Agents proceed to pull every frozen bag full of meat out of the refrigerator. The questions abound from the USFWS special agents. What's this? When did you kill this? Is this goose or duck? I replied with a lot of I don't know's.

The next set of questions related to who removed the bird from the grill. Who placed the bird on the boat? Who took the picture? Whose camera was used? Who threw the bird in the grass? I could not remember the exact details. It was obvious that the special agents were looking for me to implicate my compadres that weekend; luckily the weekend was all a blur, like most hunting weekends.

The next question asked. Did I know what the federal possession limit was for waterfowl. I answered I know what the Texas possession limit is. I was then informed the USFWS did not care about the Texas limit, they enforced federal law. Basically, I was close on possession limit, so they wanted to check the garage for a freezer, no problem, and no freezer.

That's when one of the agents noticed a National Wildlife Refuge Sign hanging above my work bench. The special agents inquired to where I acquired the sign, I replied "on the roadside". I guarantee there was no crime committed on my part to acquire the sign. The Special Agents then took a picture of the sign and removed it with my permission.

As the visit closed out the Special Agents wrote me a ticket for possession of a Great Horned Owl without a permit, even though they could not define what constituted possession. I also mentioned that this was the first ticket or violation I had ever received. This statement was met with a quick retort from Special Agent Hamilton, informing me I had received a warning violation last year for hunting dove in Oklahoma during rifle deer season w/o wearing blaze orange. I flat out laughed at that, just hilarious, that USFWS would consider that important.

I was then informed that I had wasted two days investigation time of the USFWS and that was the real reason I was receiving the ticket. Imagine that, a civil servant who had his time wasted by a taxpayer, the entitlement of the attitude was unreal. That ended the visit from the USFWS.

Skip ahead to the plan of attack. Chris Carlson and I were going to fight the possession of a Great Horned Owl without a permit, as it the charge was completely baseless. Another nice tactic was that the USFWS Special Agent called with less than 2 days notice of the court date. Several attempts were made by Chris Carlson and myself to avoid trial, including an offer by Chris Carlson to offer the amount of the fine, $875.00 as a donation to Delta Waterfowl or Ducks Unlimited. This offer was rejected because of my outlaw ways. Mainly because I possessed U.S. Government property, i.e. the National Wildlife Refuge sign. It came down to if we fought the possession of great horned owl charge, I would be charged with conversion of government property. The cost of defending this charge was a no win situation, even if we beat the possession charge. I decided at this point, a possible $100,000.00 fine was not in my best financial interest. Chris Carlson obtained an agreement in which I paid the fine for possession of a great horned owl w/o a permit, and no charges would be brought for illegal conversion for government property. I am grateful for the expert advice provided from the hunting and law perspective that Chris Carlson provided.

What I have learned from this ordeal:

1. Never let a LEO in your house without a search warrant, I do not how strongly to stress this one, I would be in good shape if I had went with my first reaction and said no.

2. These specific USFWS Special Agents rather a fine is paid then benefit wildlife.

3. USFWS is not interested in Texas State Waterfowl possession laws.

4. USFWS can not define possession laws.

6. 4 out of 4 people I know find encounters with Steve Hamilton unpleasant.

7. Chris Carlson is a stand-up guy, who should be contacted if you find yourself in any similar situation.



Note:

Whatever Brokedick JackAzz turned me in to the Texas Parks and Wildlife is a no-account piece of smegma. My sincere hope is that you reap everything you have sewn. My guess is that you will be checking out Websters for at least one word in this paragraph, and I hope to God, I or anyone else on this forum ever finds out your sorry azz identity.
 
Last edited:
not is the house. wanna bet? your house is very much protected from that search and seizure without warrant. hunting and fishing gear in plain view in a vehicle is one thing. Not the house though. (yes i do have a background in this btw) Wardens cannot go into a house or any living quarters without consent or a warrant. That is well established law.

 
State definition of possession and federal are many times different. Some state possession ends at processing or final home. Although not always enforced Note federal is irrelevant of processed or final destination.

We have fedex’d a procession limit home before.
 
Really murky subject.

What I have learned from this ordeal:

1. Never let a LEO in your house without a search warrant, I do not how strongly to stress this one, I would be in good shape if I had went with my first reaction and said no.

4. USFWS can not define possession laws.

Sorry you had to go thru this whole thing - that's nuts.

Years back, when I was in CT, we had a GW we called Little Hitler - he was a huge prick and was scratching paint off my duck gun in an effort to record the serial number, glad my dad was there as he'd still be working on it. The other LEOs were decent - I saw them every Saturday during duck season (sometimes they'd come and sit in the duck blind and chat with us) and every other Saturday during the summer - only Lil Hitler would do the full check every time. We would release any fish that were not 1/4 to 1/2 inch longer than the legal limit cause of this dude - his attitude was that you did something wrong and he was gonna find it and make you pay.

You need to add:

8. Don't photograph a dead owl on your truck or duck boat and post the images online. That is if they were indeed posted online.

I can't imagine how many folks get into a lot of trouble by posting stuff online and/or being compliant - trying to be helpful as opposed to saying, get a warrant.

I've had my truck searched when I was younger - the LEO was looking for a shotgun behind the seat - there had been a shooting at a keg party a short time earlier and my truck matched the description. All of us in the truck had movie ticket receipts that covered the time of the shooting and there was no shotgun in the truck so let him look. The option was being brought own to the station for questioning and such due to the truck matching the description...
 
They shut down I-70 about 3 years ago during 2nd rifle season. Had in excess of 50 state vehicles from WY, UT, and CO digging through cars, trucks, campers, etc. Not counting 2-3 helicopters. Too bad they don't work as hard at rooting out corruption in state and federal governments. I could not careless what they do as I cross the t's and dot the i's but I still find it excessive.

I think this thread brings up all kinds of questions for upland hunters as well. So I am hunting non migratory game birds in Kansas. I get my daily and possession limits of pheasants in Kansas and stop in Nebraska to hunt quail. They check me and I exceed the Nebraska limit of pheasants even though they were killed in Kansas. Do they have to prove I killed them in Nebraska or do I have to prove I am innocent? I kind of go with the innocent until proven guilty concept we were founded on.

That's a tough one - I can see it going both ways but you do have the license from KS.
Nothing wrong with making the most out of your trip.
 
They shut down I-70 about 3 years ago during 2nd rifle season. Had in excess of 50 state vehicles from WY, UT, and CO digging through cars, trucks, campers, etc. Not counting 2-3 helicopters. Too bad they don't work as hard at rooting out corruption in state and federal governments. I could not careless what they do as I cross the t's and dot the i's but I still find it excessive.

I think this thread brings up all kinds of questions for upland hunters as well. So I am hunting non migratory game birds in Kansas. I get my daily and possession limits of pheasants in Kansas and stop in Nebraska to hunt quail. They check me and I exceed the Nebraska limit of pheasants even though they were killed in Kansas. Do they have to prove I killed them in Nebraska or do I have to prove I am innocent? I kind of go with the innocent until proven guilty concept we were founded on.
Innocent until proven guilty is defiantly still a thing but so is probable cause. Having over the limit in the area you currently are hunting is enough probable cause for a citation or arrest (if whatever violation warranted an arrest). Then, you would be innocent until proven guilty in court.
 
Got a message into Nebraska now. I'll call Kansas too. Better than speculating.
 
I've always wondered about this topic. I'm a MT resident but also hunt pheasant in ND each year as well. See their definitions below.

MT possession limit is 3 times the daily, so 9 pheasants. ND's is 3 daily and 12 in possession while on a trip, but unlimited at home (if I'm reading the correct info).

So if I go hunting in ND for a week and get my 12 phez and head home am I breaking the law once I cross the border? I wouldn't think so, but I don't know? If I'm not breaking the law does that mean I could have an unlimited amount of pheasant in my freezer at home because I have a ND pheasant license even though MT law says I can only have 9 in any form? I'm going to email this to a MT game warden. Brings up a pile of questions.

This is from the MT Upland Game Regulation, page 4.

"Possession Limit while in the Field (CR) No person shall possess more than one daily bag limit while in the field, or while returning from the field to one’s vehicle, hunting camp, home, etc.
Possession Limit (CR) The number of birds that may be possessed at any time in any form: fresh, stored in freezers or lockers, salted, smoked, dried, canned, or preserved. "

Here is ND's description in their small game proclamation.

“Daily bag limit” means the maximum number of the particular game referred to in single or aggregate for which a bag limit is prescribed and that one hunter, legally licensed by this state, may take or kill for that species during a single hunting day, within the boundaries of this state to include Indian reservations.
“Possession limit” means the maximum number of the particular game referred (except waterfowl and migratory game birds) that a hunter, legally licensed by this state, may have in his/her actual possession during any phase of any single hunting trip, venture, or expedition of more than one day. The possession limit at one’s personal permanent residence is unlimited. No more than a daily limit may be taken on any one day
 
This is from the MT Upland Game Regulation, page 4.

"Possession Limit while in the Field (CR) No person shall possess more than one daily bag limit while in the field, or while returning from the field to one’s vehicle, hunting camp, home, etc.
Possession Limit (CR) The number of birds that may be possessed at any time in any form: fresh, stored in freezers or lockers, salted, smoked, dried, canned, or preserved. "

Here is ND's description in their small game proclamation.

“Daily bag limit” means the maximum number of the particular game referred to in single or aggregate for which a bag limit is prescribed and that one hunter, legally licensed by this state, may take or kill for that species during a single hunting day, within the boundaries of this state to include Indian reservations.
“Possession limit” means the maximum number of the particular game referred (except waterfowl and migratory game birds) that a hunter, legally licensed by this state, may have in his/her actual possession during any phase of any single hunting trip, venture, or expedition of more than one day. The possession limit at one’s personal permanent residence is unlimited. No more than a daily limit may be taken on any one day

That shows that not all states are created equal.

ND has it right. If there is a daily limit, why try to regulate the take by regulating freezers, why not have a season limit?
 
I've always wondered about this topic. I'm a MT resident but also hunt pheasant in ND each year as well. See their definitions below.

MT possession limit is 3 times the daily, so 9 pheasants. ND's is 3 daily and 12 in possession while on a trip, but unlimited at home (if I'm reading the correct info).

So if I go hunting in ND for a week and get my 12 phez and head home am I breaking the law once I cross the border? I wouldn't think so, but I don't know? If I'm not breaking the law does that mean I could have an unlimited amount of pheasant in my freezer at home because I have a ND pheasant license even though MT law says I can only have 9 in any form? I'm going to email this to a MT game warden. Brings up a pile of questions.

This is from the MT Upland Game Regulation, page 4.

"Possession Limit while in the Field (CR) No person shall possess more than one daily bag limit while in the field, or while returning from the field to one’s vehicle, hunting camp, home, etc.
Possession Limit (CR) The number of birds that may be possessed at any time in any form: fresh, stored in freezers or lockers, salted, smoked, dried, canned, or preserved. "

Here is ND's description in their small game proclamation.

“Daily bag limit” means the maximum number of the particular game referred to in single or aggregate for which a bag limit is prescribed and that one hunter, legally licensed by this state, may take or kill for that species during a single hunting day, within the boundaries of this state to include Indian reservations.
“Possession limit” means the maximum number of the particular game referred (except waterfowl and migratory game birds) that a hunter, legally licensed by this state, may have in his/her actual possession during any phase of any single hunting trip, venture, or expedition of more than one day. The possession limit at one’s personal permanent residence is unlimited. No more than a daily limit may be taken on any one day
I'd call MT and ND to check. I just had a super nice Game Warden from Nebraska call me back. I explained that I may be hunting pheasants in Kansas in the morning where the limit is 4. If I place blue tape on their legs, record the date taken and then take a pic of them next to the state ground in Kansas I am hunting, he said there would be no issue having them in Nebraska and continuing to hunt birds there on the same day.

Of course I'd need to show my Kansas license also. I am really sold on Nebraska's fish and game group. Polite people who seem to sincerely want you to be successful in the field. Glad I called them instead of guessing and I'll be sure to clearly label any birds I take during one trip that overlaps both states.
 
Back
Top