I'm not disagreeing with the math, and I'm sure like the toprut example, after simulations, it works out in the longterm.On balance, the guy with the biggest number in denominator is more likely to win.
But yes, someone could win despite having the number “1” in his denominator.
Damn, I wish CPW had just used simple BPs to accomplish this same result rather than using numerators and denominators.
The Josh & Katie example demonstrates how a 3+0 guy can win.I'm not disagreeing with the math, and I'm sure like the toprut example, after simulations, it works out in the longterm.
But the cpw example makes it hard to comprehend the weighted points making that much difference. I mean in there own example Josh(with 10pp) would have needed 1235+ points to beat Katie with 2pp....
Yea, I'm hoping to be that 3+0 guy one day, lol.But the “law of diminishing returns” applies here. So each extra point is worth less than the last. I stopped buying at 3+5 because I’m 45. But I will probably buy for my 14yo son up to about 3+15.