Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It hasI am so glad ai has not made its way to rokslide. Please keep it pure over here.
Thank you!
Yep Id wager theres one in this very thread who does it all the time.....What makes you think posts aren’t being generated via AI here?
Ok, imma block you nowWhether AI-generated posts should be allowed on online forums is a nuanced question, and the answer depends on the forum’s goals, community norms, and how the AI is used. Here’s a breakdown of the key arguments for and against allowing AI-generated content:
1.
- AI can quickly provide accurate, well-sourced information, especially in technical or educational forums (e.g., Stack Overflow, Reddit’s r/AskScience).
- Useful for FAQs, summaries, or generating starter content.
2.
- Non-native speakers or individuals with disabilities can use AI to participate more easily in discussions.
- AI can help translate thoughts into clearer or more structured language.
3.
- In creative communities (e.g., writing, design), AI can inspire new ideas or serve as a collaborative tool.
4.
- AI can automate repetitive answers (e.g., how to reset a password), reducing the burden on moderators or experts.
1.
- AI might “hallucinate” or confidently present incorrect information, especially in niche or sensitive topics.
- It may lack up-to-date data, leading to outdated advice.
2.
- Forums built on personal experience, emotion, or trust (like health support groups or opinion-based discussions) can be damaged by the impersonal nature of AI content.
- Users may not know whether they’re engaging with a person or a bot.
3.
- AI can produce vast quantities of content, potentially overwhelming human users and degrading the signal-to-noise ratio.
4.
- If users rely on AI instead of participating meaningfully, forums may lose their sense of community and peer-to-peer interaction.
Many communities are exploring hybrid approaches, such as:
- Labeling AI content clearly.
- Allowing AI assistance for drafts, but requiring human editing before posting.
- Restricting AI use in certain subforums (e.g., debates, personal support).
- Moderating AI-generated posts with stricter guidelines.
Bottom Line:
Whether AI should be allowed depends on the forum’s purpose and values. Transparency, moderation, and clear rules are key to ensuring that AI helps rather than harms community quality.
I have not noticed any obvious fake profile AI posts here as of yet.What makes you think posts aren’t being generated via AI here?
I have not noticed any obvious fake profile AI posts here as of yet.
- Forums built on … emotion, … can be damaged by the impersonal nature of AI
We're all well aware.
Gosh, I don’t want to have my feelings hurt
All of these things are the same things humans do. As far as translating languages I hear eniugh abiut non residents now I cant imagine the welcome people from other countries will receive. If I wanted AI answering my questions I would google them. Generally the AI answer in google is immediately followed by the source it plagiarized. Let social media be social, not robotized. If the mods use AI to track trends that is a business decision of the operators. Queries and responses should be people with "real" intelligence sharing experience.Whether AI-generated posts should be allowed on online forums is a nuanced question, and the answer depends on the forum’s goals, community norms, and how the AI is used. Here’s a breakdown of the key arguments for and against allowing AI-generated content:
1.
- AI can quickly provide accurate, well-sourced information, especially in technical or educational forums (e.g., Stack Overflow, Reddit’s r/AskScience).
- Useful for FAQs, summaries, or generating starter content.
2.
- Non-native speakers or individuals with disabilities can use AI to participate more easily in discussions.
- AI can help translate thoughts into clearer or more structured language.
3.
- In creative communities (e.g., writing, design), AI can inspire new ideas or serve as a collaborative tool.
4.
- AI can automate repetitive answers (e.g., how to reset a password), reducing the burden on moderators or experts.
1.
- AI might “hallucinate” or confidently present incorrect information, especially in niche or sensitive topics.
- It may lack up-to-date data, leading to outdated advice.
2.
- Forums built on personal experience, emotion, or trust (like health support groups or opinion-based discussions) can be damaged by the impersonal nature of AI content.
- Users may not know whether they’re engaging with a person or a bot.
3.
- AI can produce vast quantities of content, potentially overwhelming human users and degrading the signal-to-noise ratio.
4.
- If users rely on AI instead of participating meaningfully, forums may lose their sense of community and peer-to-peer interaction.
Many communities are exploring hybrid approaches, such as:
- Labeling AI content clearly.
- Allowing AI assistance for drafts, but requiring human editing before posting.
- Restricting AI use in certain subforums (e.g., debates, personal support).
- Moderating AI-generated posts with stricter guidelines.
Bottom Line:
Whether AI should be allowed depends on the forum’s purpose and values. Transparency, moderation, and clear rules are key to ensuring that AI helps rather than harms community quality.
That site is a joke. AI could only make it better, much better if it took over moderation.
It’ll taper off eventuallyYep Id wager theres one in this very thread who does it all the time.....