I didn’t have a hard time staying on target with either gun really. The 22CM was definitely easier though. The 22CM was hard to see the misses at distance most of the time because of the tall grass and not kicking up much splash in the dirt.
The drawback of the 22CM was mostly during the headwind stages, getting blown off target. And then during the cross wind stages, you have the mental addition of holding an actual wind call with the reticle. Other than that, it was all benefits and was great and fun to shoot. Just didn’t hit the target as many times.
The benefits of the 7-300 was the wind forgiveness really. I never had the small mental thoughts of holding off target with an actual wind hold. The wind wasn’t ripping either day, there was just a constant breeze. So with the 7-300, I would just use the center of the reticle and hold it on the windy edge of the of target and brake the shot. The drawbacks were recoil, noise, longer bolt cycle, harder bolt cycle distorting the position more (Lapua sized cases can be a little tougher to get a bolt lift, even with decent sizing at the case web), longer time between follow up shots when there was a miss (recoil recovery paired with bolt cycle). Basically everything of the 7-300 was a drawback or negative in comparison to the 22CM, besides… actually hitting the target. At least in this comparison, and under these circumstances. Which was what I was there to find out.
I’m already trending smaller and smaller as I test different bullets and cartridges. I don’t see myself spending too too much more time behind the cannons as the year goes on. The 6.5-7 PRC (not so much the cartridge, but just a 156 Berger at 3100+ FPS with hardly any recoil) definitely has my interest at the moment and is way more pleasant to shoot than the 7-300 hahaha.