Pfizer clinical trial data: not good at all

Status
Not open for further replies.

MattB

WKR
Joined
Sep 29, 2012
Messages
5,743
Masking people isn't working, the vaccines don't prevent spread or prevent getting the virus so mandates are pointless, including having different rules for the vaccinated and unvaccinated. An unvaccinated person is not a danger to a vaccinated person any more than two vaccinated people together. Fauci has lied consistently through this whole thing and no doubt has little man syndrome and wants to have control. Biden is a moron. The mandates are about control. Most of the "conspiracy" and "misinformation" from one side has now been admitted as truth by the media and even some on the left (see media). A ton of the "misinformation" from the other side (white house, CDC, media, left) has proven false and/or incredibly misleading Note: I did not say all "misinformation' or all "conspiracies". Live a healthy life and don't be a fat slob and the numbers are largely in your favor.

Get the shot don't get the shot whatever. BUT, if you believe a good idea is to force it on someone you are nothing less than a POS.
The unvaccinated do not represent a direct risk in terms of spreading the disease (esp. with Omicron), but it appears that we are once again on the verge of having the unvaccinated overrun our healthcare system and inadvertently blocking others of needed access. People have died and other people probably will die due to the collective impact of those who have made the decision not to get vaccinated.
 

TripleJ

WKR
Joined
Apr 12, 2016
Messages
1,979
Location
OR
This is a good (IMHO) podcast that came out today - https://peterattiamd.com/covid-19-current-state-omicron/. Peter Attia interviews two MDs - Marty Makary and Zubin Damania. I expect that everyone who has chimed in on this thread (at least lately) will find something they agree with, and something that conflicts with their views.
Finally got around to listening to this, thank you for the suggestion. It was very well done.
 

mwebs

WKR
Joined
Sep 2, 2018
Messages
387
Location
ID
The unvaccinated do not represent a direct risk in terms of spreading the disease (esp. with Omicron), but it appears that we are once again on the verge of having the unvaccinated overrun our healthcare system and inadvertently blocking others of needed access. People have died and other people probably will die due to the collective impact of those who have made the decision not to get vaccinated.

How do you know the vaccine would have prevented them from going to the hospital? Maybe the for profit healthcare system needs to receive some blame here, do you know what ICU bed occupancy was pre pandemic? It’s not like hospitals just build rooms to remain empty so they can loose money, there was an available bed issue before Covid and there will be after, it’s a business decision. To blame people that can’t, are skeptical or don’t need the vaccine for full hospitals is a stupid and tired argument. To base health care decisions on vaccine status is akin to basing it on race, religion, etc.

Show me actual evidence, not media scare articles about people needing care and dying because of hospitals not providing care.

After the pandemic I hope we take a look at people’s choices to be fat, smoke, partake in risky activities like hunt in the mountains and make sure they are at the back of the line for care sense all those are personal choices they made.
 

Marbles

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
May 16, 2020
Messages
4,466
Location
AK
Why!?!? Why did you have to do it?!? Why did you feel the need to denigrate Road House? Even in these divisive times, we should all be able to agree that Road House was awesome. If we can't agree on that, then all hope is lost.
I'm sorry, you a right. I was very, very wrong to do that!

My wife asked me what I was smiling at when I read your post. Turns out she has never seen Road House, so we now have our next movie picked out.
 

Actual_Cryptid

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Sep 16, 2021
Messages
200
Am I wrong in my understanding that the science is very much not settled on masks?
Except for a very well fitting, frequently disposed of N95?
What have you seen or read that indicates ineffectiveness?

Typically what I see touted is that they're not a 100% protection, which is true, but is also not what's been claimed about them. But we can examine the evidence available and see that there's definitely a protective effect.


This paper is a metareview of the evidence available. They break down differtent types of masks, examine the data ion implementation, mention the concerns involved, and it cites the studies from which data is pulled and comes out strongly in favor of masks, both cotton and N95, as a pandemic protection protocol. For N95s and filtration masks, they are more effective at reducing the chances of infection given good fit, but the cost and need to replace whem whever you remove one to drink, eat, or sweat it through makes them not a great choice for everyone. Cloth masks when worn by everyone reduce the spread by limiting how far your spittle travels when you speak, cough, or sneeze. You should still wash your hands before and after removing or putting your mask on, maintain a larger personal bubble and limit the time you're packed into an enclosed space with larger groups of poor air circulation because it's a layer of protection but not total protection.

I like analogies. Masks are like wearing earpro and eyepro at the range. Won't stop a bullet fired directly at you, won't prevent all hearing damage if you're firing machineguns in an enclosed space, but will keep debris and burning powder out of your eyes if they fit and will reduce or mitigate hearing loss risk to a certain degree.

Typically what I see is that the "they don't work" crowd latches onto "cloth masks don't provide absolute protection against exposure" and extrapolates out to "they don't work" which is sort of like saying that since some people die wearing their seatbelts, seat belts don't work.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
1,071
Can someone explain to me what “fully vaccinated” means?

Also, how can you blame unvaccinated-against-covid people, for spreading covid in places where they’re not allowed to go, but “fully vaccinated” people are allowed to go? Vaccine passports that allow you to go somewhere, where you can still get and spread covid, makes no sense to me. It seems more like a reward. But then the same people blame the spread and variants on unvaccinated people?? Explain this to me please.

If people spent as much time and energy on actually proving where the virus came from, maybe it would help persuade people to get these shots. We have a pretty good group consensus on how it got here, according to some poll data (that I don’t care to find a link for). Why isn’t this what we’re all talking about? This is worse than 9/11, or any of the modern wars. IMO, this is why there are conspiracies about the vaccinations.
 

Actual_Cryptid

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Sep 16, 2021
Messages
200
How do you know the vaccine would have prevented them from going to the hospital? Maybe the for profit healthcare system needs to receive some blame here, do you know what ICU bed occupancy was pre pandemic? It’s not like hospitals just build rooms to remain empty so they can loose money, there was an available bed issue before Covid and there will be after, it’s a business decision. To blame people that can’t, are skeptical or don’t need the vaccine for full hospitals is a stupid and tired argument. To base health care decisions on vaccine status is akin to basing it on race, religion, etc.

Health care decisions are not like religion or race. You can't change your race, and we wrote it into our laws that we don't want to use the government to incentivize people to change religions. We do want to incentivize people to make good health decisions to mitigate the spread of infectious disease. That's what programs like needle exchanges, public vaccination efforts, and other public health education programs are for.

We do know what ICU bedspace looked like and we cna in fact compare how it looked over the course of the pandemic!


Globally

Different journal and researcher, same conclusion!

We have known since 1918 and before that pandemics wreak havoc on critical care. It's why we have a pandemic response protocol nationally and at all state levels, because we know that it's not just a matter of beds but staffing as well. That portion of the response is referred to as "flattening the curve", a phrase you should remember, and includes efforts to slow the spread until containment, vaccination, and treatment can speed up.

Of course you might be suggesting that we, as a nation, do something to rectify the problems of running our healthcare systems for profit. Maybe we could use tax dollars to fund more excess capacity. Sounds like some commie nonsense though.
 

Yoder

WKR
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Messages
1,671
No you are not.
It's pretty simple. What is the particle size of the virus? What filter media is being used? The virus is spread by aerosols which are your breath. If the virus in your breath can pass through the filter media being used, you can get covid. If the mask isn't perfectly sealed to your face you can get covid. I wear respirators all the time. If you really want to be "safe" get a cartridge style full face respirator. Get a fit test and check your face seal before you go out. If you're wearing a cotton mask it's like putting up a chain link fence to keep mosquitoes out of your yard. Use science and common sense.
 

MattB

WKR
Joined
Sep 29, 2012
Messages
5,743
How do you know the vaccine would have prevented them from going to the hospital? Maybe the for profit healthcare system needs to receive some blame here, do you know what ICU bed occupancy was pre pandemic? It’s not like hospitals just build rooms to remain empty so they can loose money, there was an available bed issue before Covid and there will be after, it’s a business decision. To blame people that can’t, are skeptical or don’t need the vaccine for full hospitals is a stupid and tired argument. To base health care decisions on vaccine status is akin to basing it on race, religion, etc.

Show me actual evidence, not media scare articles about people needing care and dying because of hospitals not providing care.

After the pandemic I hope we take a look at people’s choices to be fat, smoke, partake in risky activities like hunt in the mountains and make sure they are at the back of the line for care sense all those are personal choices they made.
There is a massive amount of data that shows that the vaccines reduce serious disease and death. Honestly, you asking that question demonstrates you have not been paying attention. The stupid and tired argument is that the unvaccinated haven’t periodically over stressed our healthcare system.

And you want proof that people have died due to not being able to get treatment due to COVID patients clogging up the system, but media articles won’t satisfy you? Do you want me to bring those who died’s kin over to your house for coffee?







 

Actual_Cryptid

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Sep 16, 2021
Messages
200
Can someone explain to me what “fully vaccinated” means?

Also, how can you blame unvaccinated-against-covid people, for spreading covid in places where they’re not allowed to go, but “fully vaccinated” people are allowed to go? Vaccine passports that allow you to go somewhere, where you can still get and spread covid, makes no sense to me. It seems more like a reward. But then the same people blame the spread and variants on unvaccinated people?? Explain this to me please.

If people spent as much time and energy on actually proving where the virus came from, maybe it would help persuade people to get these shots. We have a pretty good group consensus on how it got here, according to some poll data (that I don’t care to find a link for). Why isn’t this what we’re all talking about? This is worse than 9/11, or any of the modern wars. IMO, this is why there are conspiracies about the vaccinations.
As far as I know we don't have vaccine passports anywhere in the US, so I'm not sure what you're responding to. There have been several busts of people faking vaccine cards or just lying about their vaccination status. there's also two other factors, that immunity (natural and otherwise) wanes and doesn't provide 100% protection, and that the virus mutates faster when it goes through unvaccinated populations. So unvaccinated people who get the virus, even with a mild infection, contribute to spreading and mutating it. Also the number of states without a contact-tracing system makes it more likely that someone will contract and spread the virus. If enough of the population in an area is vaccinated, you can achieve herd immunity, the virus doesn't gain enough of a foothold to spread to the population that cna't be vaccinated, but that number tends to be over 85%. I hope that helps.

"Fully vaccinated" refers to people who have had the full recommended course, either one or two shots based on the specific vaccine.

To head it off, "natural immunity" is not currently relied upon because without drawing titers it's difficult to demonstrate what level of protection someone currently has, there have been some studied underway but it's not like a vaccine research program where you know what date exactly you gave the vaccine and what their titer levels were, that you can track how quickly they degrade. again, with a decent contact tracing program we could have better data.

It strikes me as a bit odd to say there's a poll with a strong consensus about where the virus "came from" but not mention who was polled, the result, or where you found the poll. Last i checked the consensuswas pretty strong that it developed in China, mutating from a wild type strain of SARS.

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867421009910

A wild virus mutating, or even a lab escape doesn't really seem comparable to 9/11. What do you think is not being done that should?

It's pretty simple. What is the particle size of the virus? What filter media is being used? The virus is spread by aerosols which are your breath. If the virus in your breath can pass through the filter media being used, you can get covid. If the mask isn't perfectly sealed to your face you can get covid. I wear respirators all the time. If you really want to be "safe" get a cartridge style full face respirator. Get a fit test and check your face seal before you go out. If you're wearing a cotton mask it's like putting up a chain link fence to keep mosquitoes out of your yard. Use science and common sense.

We should use science! See, it's not the virus particle size that matters, because the virus is riding on fomites and aerosols. That's why the cloth remains effective as a mitigation effort, as illustrated in the scientific research paper I linked above that reviewed the efficacy of masks.



Science!
 

jmez

WKR
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
7,552
Location
Piedmont, SD
It's pretty simple. What is the particle size of the virus? What filter media is being used? The virus is spread by aerosols which are your breath. If the virus in your breath can pass through the filter media being used, you can get covid. If the mask isn't perfectly sealed to your face you can get covid. I wear respirators all the time. If you really want to be "safe" get a cartridge style full face respirator. Get a fit test and check your face seal before you go out. If you're wearing a cotton mask it's like putting up a chain link fence to keep mosquitoes out of your yard. Use science and common sense.
What was the CDC's published stance on mask usage prior to about August of 2020? What was the stance of the entire western medical community on mask usage to prevent respiratory disease of the public since forever? What landmark study, with a standardized protocol, has been published in the last 2 years to completely change these recommendations? Not meta analysis, not retrospective studies, not people coughing on a petri dish with and without masks, and not wearing a mask in the winter and watching all the condensation.

In order for the medical community to completely change their policy or stance it used to require a landmark study proving otherwise. So far, that study doesn't exist.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
1,071
As far as I know we don't have vaccine passports anywhere in the US, so I'm not sure what you're responding to. There have been several busts of people faking vaccine cards or just lying about their vaccination status. there's also two other factors, that immunity (natural and otherwise) wanes and doesn't provide 100% protection, and that the virus mutates faster when it goes through unvaccinated populations. So unvaccinated people who get the virus, even with a mild infection, contribute to spreading and mutating it. Also the number of states without a contact-tracing system makes it more likely that someone will contract and spread the virus. If enough of the population in an area is vaccinated, you can achieve herd immunity, the virus doesn't gain enough of a foothold to spread to the population that cna't be vaccinated, but that number tends to be over 85%. I hope that helps.

"Fully vaccinated" refers to people who have had the full recommended course, either one or two shots based on the specific vaccine.

To head it off, "natural immunity" is not currently relied upon because without drawing titers it's difficult to demonstrate what level of protection someone currently has, there have been some studied underway but it's not like a vaccine research program where you know what date exactly you gave the vaccine and what their titer levels were, that you can track how quickly they degrade. again, with a decent contact tracing program we could have better data.

It strikes me as a bit odd to say there's a poll with a strong consensus about where the virus "came from" but not mention who was polled, the result, or where you found the poll. Last i checked the consensuswas pretty strong that it developed in China, mutating from a wild type strain of SARS.

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867421009910

A wild virus mutating, or even a lab escape doesn't really seem comparable to 9/11. What do you think is not being done that should?



We should use science! See, it's not the virus particle size that matters, because the virus is riding on fomites and aerosols. That's why the cloth remains effective as a mitigation effort, as illustrated in the scientific research paper I linked above that reviewed the efficacy of masks.



Science!
I'm not going to write a book, but speaking of misinformation:
1641326116675.png
Seems like there's a whole lot of "breakthrough cases". (90% or higher)


"A vaccine passport is some sort of documentation that proves an individual has received the required vaccination to engage in an activity, whether it be traveling or attending an event."
I didn't say "digital vaccine passport" I said vaccine passport.


We can both agree that the virus came from China.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top