Americans..."I bought my house 5 years ago and its up 40%. This is awesome, I love capitalism, all those that complain should have bought in earlier...to bad I took the risk."Anything to the left of the arbitrary line:
View attachment 303249
it's What the market will bear. Is it right, that is up to the individual to decide.When nobody buys what you are selling, you marked it up too much.
Not sure why it should irritate you. I'm sure if he's priced it too high above market pricing then others won't be buying it from him, so not sure how that affects you or irritates you in any way.I was on another forum last night and someone was selling 5.7 ammo for $70 a box. This kind of scalping just irritates me.
Maybe if it’s a 290 6x6 and your guide charges you a $10,000 trophy fee you didn’t know aboutIf you were hunting elk and passed on a bunch of 5x5s and small 6x6s, and were later rewarded with an opportunity at a big 6x6, are you hunt gouging?
That's gota hurt.Maybe if it’s a 290 6x6 and your guide charges you a $10,000 trophy fee you didn’t know about
For Elk I shoot 300 win. mag. Barnes 180 gn. ttsx. If you can find it, plan on paying $120.00 for twenty. It's what the market will bare. After what guys spend on an Elk hunt that is an insignificant cost.
House next to me, 3 BR, 2Bath, 1250 sq. ft. Last august Listed for $695k, 22 offers later sold for $769K
So what is the acceptable level of mark up on anything?
Most middlemen add value (move goods, store goods until needed, Etc.). I figured the parentheses showed that the no value statement was referencing back to the case in question that was discussed in the same sentence, guess I should have been wordier to make that clearer. Also, dispite being a terrible speller I did intend to say "their" as typed and was not misspelling there.If you're up for a challenge to your preconceived notions, here's a good explanation of the legitimate economic role of the much-maligned "middleman": https://mises.org/library/24-middleman
I was on another forum last night and someone was selling 5.7 ammo for $70 a box. This kind of scalping just irritates me. I have quite a stock of ammo, not as much as i would like more than a lot of people. But i hate to see people buying ammo at those prices. the guys scalping should be ashamed of themselves. but i am sure they have morals or spine anyway. I did put a message on his post saying he should be ashamed of himself and got a nasty gram from said forum. But worth it, if for no other reason than to make myself feel better. In all this i have not sold ammo to anyone for more than i have bought it for and most of the time just give it to those who need it with the instruction when you find some you pay me back. The same with anything else people need. Grrrr just irritates me to no end people blowing up prices on things In this way. Hope you all have a great day.
There is no such thing as price gouging.
I'll have to get back to you with a more complete answer to the homework assignment, but for now I'll just say that the fact that the middleman reselling ammo can turn a profit is itself proof that he is providing a valuable service. If there were no value being added, there would be no profit opportunity. His valuable service may be as seemingly trite as being in the right place at the right time to buy ammo from a primary retailer, but it is a service nonetheless that buyers in secondary markets such as GunBroker, online forums, etc. are currently willing to pay a premium over retail prices for.Most middlemen add value (move goods, store goods until needed, Etc.). I figured the parentheses showed that the no value statement was referencing back to the case in question that was discussed in the same sentence, guess I should have been wordier to make that clearer. Also, dispite being a terrible speller I did intend to say "their" as typed and was not misspelling there.
Listen to the link you posted. Then tell me the the five things that it states in defense of middlemen that do not apply to the scenario I described in my post. Alternatively, describe the specific value provided by the middleman in that scenario that makes his services worth the price (not the product, specifically what he contributes by walking into the store, buying all of a product, then reselling it to the stores normal customers). Remember, by your own source middlemen must provide an essential service, or people would just go around them in a free market. Well there is 1 of the 5 for you as his service only exists because he has cut off the ability to go around him by controlling the supply, as soon as he can no longer control supply what will happen?