Paradox of choice paralysis....

[PaulB84]

S&B Polar or Leica Amplus 6. No way would I buy a "forever scope" without spectacular low light performance.

Lol damnit. See....why can't we have it all?!

 

[KenLee]

Lol damnit. See....why can't we have it all?!

I think i have it all with my Mangus i...but they are no longer for sale in US. Amplus is almost as good for significantly less $

 

[PaulB84]

Most of my rifles have VX6s, but my last 2 were built with Trijicon Credo HXs. I had 1 VX6 lose its zero, I caught it before my hunt but I lost a lot of confidence in the scope. I've been really impressed with the Trijicons so far and based on reviews, I have a lot of confidence that it won't lose zero. This is the version I got, it's got the illuminated reticle, but it's SFP. There are some FFP versions, worth your consideration.

https://www.trijicon.com/products/product-family/trijicon-credo-hx-4-16x50-riflescope

Been trying to figure out the difference between the Credos and the Tenmiles. I've heard they're identical internally but the Tenmiles are above 16x max magnification? Can anyone confirm or deny that?

Is the Accupoint lineup old news at this point in favor of the Credos and Tenmiles?

 

[PaulB84]

I think i have it all with my Mangus i...but they are no longer for sale in US. Amplus is almost as good for significantly less $

Whoa. Why is the Leica so cheap? When you mentioned it next to the Polar I was expecting a 3-4k price tag.

 

[KenLee]

Whoa. Why is the Leica so cheap? When you mentioned it next to the Polar I was expecting a 3-4k price tag.

Their pricing and lack of marketing in the US bumfuzzles me. I have four ER 5 Leica scopes w 4a reticles that are are nice as any non illuminated scopes. Paid less than $700 each for them. Paid $2500 for my 56mm magnus i.

 

[BCDJR]

If you go SP then Swarovski would be ok . I’m sure you know they do not do well with ballistic turrets. The new plus model is reportedly fixed that issue.